Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:45:08.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Practices and Attitudes of Surgeons Toward the Prevention of Surgical Site Infections: A Provincial Survey in Alberta, Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Philip J. B. Davis ,
Donald Spady ,
Chris de Gara  and
Sarah E. D. Forgie
Philip J. B. Davis
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Donald Spady
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Chris de Gara
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Sarah E. D. Forgie*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
*
Room 8213, Aberhart Centre, 11402 University Avenue, Edmonton, AB, TGG 2J3 (sarahforgie@cha.ab.ca)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We surveyed 589 surgeons in Alberta, Canada, about the prevention of surgical site infections and compared their practices to the recommendations of evidence-based guidelines. Of the 247 (42%) who responded, most (156 [63%]) were not in compliance with guideline recommendations for preoperative bathing, hair removal, antimicrobial prophylaxis, or intraoperative skin preparation (although 91 [37%] state they are following guidelines).

Type
Concise Communications
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 29 , Issue 12 , December 2008 , pp. 1164 - 1166
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hospital Infections Program. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) report, data summary from October 1986-April 1996, issued May 1996: a report from the NNIS System. Am J Infect Control 1996;24:380–388.Google Scholar
2. Nichols, RL. Preventing surgical site infections: a surgeon's perspective. Emerg Infect Dis 2001;7:220–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Mangram, AJ, Horan, TC, Pearson, ML, Silver, LC, Jarvis, WR, The Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:250–280.Google Scholar
4. Larson, E. Status of practice guidelines in the United States: CDC guidelines as an example. Prev Med 2003;36:519–524.Google Scholar
5. Castella, A, Charrier, L, Di Legami, V, et al. Piemonte Nosocomial Infection Study Group. Surgical site infection surveillance: analysis of adherence to recommendations for routine infection control practices. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:835–840.Google Scholar
6. Moro, ML. Health care-associated infections. Surg Infect Larchmt 2006;7(Suppl 2):S21–S23.Google Scholar
7. Medical Profession Act, R.S.A. 2000, c. M-ll. Canadian Legal Information Institute. Available at http://www.canlii.org/ab/laws/sta/m-ll/20060614/whole.html. Accessed May 9, 2008.Google Scholar
8. Webster, J, Osborne, S. Preoperative bathing or showering with skin antiseptics to prevent surgical site infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;2:CD004985.Google Scholar
9. Mishriki, SF, Law, DJ, Jeffery, PJ. Factors affecting the incidence of postoperative wound infection. J Hosp Infect 1990;16:223–230.Google Scholar
10. 5 Million Lives Campaign. Getting Started Kit: Prevent Surgical Site Infections How-To Guide. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2008.Google Scholar