Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:11:30.856Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Can alternative anatomical sites and environmental surveillance replace perianal screening for multidrug-resistant organisms in nursing homes?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2021

Kyle J. Gontjes Open the ORCID record for Kyle J. Gontjes [Opens in a new window] ,
Kristen E. Gibson ,
Bonnie Lansing ,
Marco Cassone  and
Lona Mody
Kyle J. Gontjes*
Affiliation:
Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Kristen E. Gibson
Affiliation:
Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Bonnie Lansing
Affiliation:
Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Marco Cassone
Affiliation:
Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Lona Mody
Affiliation:
Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan Geriatrics Research, Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
*
Author for correspondence: Kyle Gontjes, E-mail: kgontjes@umich.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Perianal screening can be intrusive. The sensitivities of multianatomical, nonperianal surveillance were 92.3% for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), 58.7% for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), and 54.9% for resistant Gram-negative bacilli (R-GNB). Sensitivities improved upon adding environmental surveillance (95.5%, 82.9%, and 67.9%, respectively). Multianatomical, nonperianal screening and room environment surveillance may replace perianal screening and reduce healthy participant bias in nursing homes.

Type
Concise Communication
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 43 , Issue 8 , August 2022 , pp. 1063 - 1066
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

PREVIOUS PRESENTATION: Preliminary findings from this manuscript were accepted for SHEA Decennial 2020 and presented at IDWeek 2020, October 22–26, 2020, conducted virtually.

References

Cassone, M, Mody, L. Colonization with multidrug-resistant organisms in nursing homes: scope, importance, and management. Curr Geriatr Rep 2015;4:87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montoya, A, Cassone, M, Mody, L. Infections in nursing homes: epidemiology and prevention programs. Clin Geriatr Med 2016;32:585–607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mody, L, Foxman, B, Bradley, S, et al. Longitudinal assessment of multidrug-resistant organisms in newly admitted nursing facility patients: implications for an evolving population. Clin Infect Dis 2018;67:837–844.Google ScholarPubMed
Charlson, M, Szatrowski, TP, Peterson, J, Gold, J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol 1994;47:1245–1251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawton, MP, Brody, EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 1969;9:179–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saliba, D, Buchanan, J. Development and Validation of a Revised Nursing Home Assessment Tool: MDS 3.0. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Health, 2008.Google Scholar
Tripepi, G, Jager, KJ, Dekker, FW, Zoccali, C. Selection bias and information bias in clinical research. Nephron Clin Pract 2010;115(2):c94–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lam, HR, Chow, S, Taylor, K, et al. Challenges of conducting research in long-term care facilities: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr 2018;18:242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weinstein, JW, Tallapragada, S, Farrel, P, Dembry, LM. Comparison of rectal and perirectal swabs for detection of colonization with vancomycin-resistant enterococci. J Clin Microbiol 1996;34:210–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lautenbach, E, Harris, AD, Perencevich, EN, Nachamkin, I, Tolomeo, P, Metlay, JP. Test characteristics of perirectal and rectal swab compared to stool sample for detection of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in the gastrointestinal tract. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005;49:798–800.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, JJ, Johnson, JK, Stucke, EM, et al. Burden of perianal Staphylococcus aureus colonization in nursing home residents increases transmission to healthcare worker gowns and gloves. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2020;41:1396–1401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cassone, M, Mantey, J, Perri, MB, et al. Environmental panels as a proxy for nursing facility patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus colonization. Clin Infect Dis 2018;67: 861–868.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Gontjes et al. supplementary material

Figures S1 and S2

Download Gontjes et al. supplementary material(File)
File 651.7 KB