Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:56:10.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Can Whipple's Disease Be Transmitted by Gastroscopes?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Bernard La Scola ,
Jean-Marc Rolain ,
Max Maurin  and
Didier Raoult
Bernard La Scola
Affiliation:
Unité des Rickettsies, CNRS UMR 6020, Faculté de médecine, 27 Boulevard Jean Moulin, 13385 Marseille Cedex 05, France
Jean-Marc Rolain
Affiliation:
Unité des Rickettsies, CNRS UMR 6020, Faculté de médecine, 27 Boulevard Jean Moulin, 13385 Marseille Cedex 05, France
Max Maurin
Affiliation:
Unité des Rickettsies, CNRS UMR 6020, Faculté de médecine, 27 Boulevard Jean Moulin, 13385 Marseille Cedex 05, France
Didier Raoult*
Affiliation:
Unité des Rickettsies, CNRS UMR 6020, Faculté de médecine, 27 Boulevard Jean Moulin, 13385 Marseille Cedex 05, France
*
Unité des Rickettsies, CNRS UMR 6020, Faculté de médecine, 27 Boulevard Jean Moulin, 13385 Marseille Cedex 05, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To determine whether disinfection protocols currently used for gastroscopes are effective against cultures of Tropheryma whipplei.

Design:

The bactericidal activity of 2% glutaraldehyde and two peracetic acids on the Twist-Marseille strain of T. whipplei grown in cell monolayers was determined.

Patients:

Two patients who were diagnosed as having Whipple's disease 3 years after they had had intestinal biopsies.

Results:

The disinfectants reduced bacteria by approximately 2 log10 to 3 log10 after 5 to 60 minutes of contact.

Conclusion:

The bactericidal activity of a disinfectant is usually considered significant if it causes a 5 log10 or greater reduction in viable bacterial titers. Disinfecting gastroscopes with 2% glutaraldehyde or peracetic acids for 20 minutes may be insufficient to prevent transmission of T. whipplei on the instruments or stop false-positive results on polymerase chain reaction.

Type
Orginal Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , March 2003 , pp. 191 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.La Scola, B, Fenollar, F, Fournier, PE, Altwegg, M, Mallet, MN, Raoult, D. Description of Tropheryma whipplei gen. nov. sp. nov., the Whipple's disease bacillus. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001;51:1471–1479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Misbah, SA, Mapstone, NP. Whipple's disease revisited. J Clin Pathol 2000;53:750–755.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Fenollar, F, Raoult, D. Whipple's disease. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2001;8:1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Maiwald, M, Reiman, DA. Whipple's disease and Tropheryma whippelii: secrets slowly revealed. Clin Infect Dis 2001;32:457–463.Google Scholar
5.Wilson, KH, Blitchington, R, Frothingham, R, Wilson, JAP. Phytogeny of the Whipple's disease-associated bacterium. Lancet 1991;338:474–475.Google Scholar
6.Reiman, DA, Schmidt, TM, MacDermott, RP, Falkow, S. Identification of the uncultured bacillus of Whipple's disease. N Engl J Med 1992;327:293–301.Google Scholar
7.Raoult, D, Birg, ML, La Scola, B, et al.Cultivation of the bacillus of Whipple's disease. N Engl J Med 2000;342:620–625.Google Scholar
8.Raoult, D, La Scola, B, Lecocq, P, Lepidi, H, Fournier, PE. Culture and immunological detection of Tropheryma whipplei from the duodenum of a patient with Whipple's disease. JAMA 2001;285:1039–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Maiwald, M, Schuhmacher, F, Ditton, HJ, von Herbay, A. Environmental occurrence of the Whipple's disease bacterium (Tropheryma whippelii). Appl Environ Microbiol 1998;64:760–762.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Best, M, Sattar, SA, Springthorpe, VS, Kennedy, ME. Efficacies of selected disinfectants against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 1990;28:2234–2239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Maurin, M, Benoliel, AM, Bongrand, P, Raoult, D. Phagolysosomal alka-linization and the bactericidal effect of antibiotics: the Coxiella burnetii paradigm. J Infect Dis 1992;166:1097–1102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Baisden, BL, Lepidi, H, Raoult, D, Argani, P, Yardley, JH, Dumler, JS. Diagnosis of Whipple disease by immunohistochemical analysis: a sensitive and specific method for the detection of Tropheryma whipplei (the Whipple bacillus) in paraffin embedded tissue. Am J Clin Pathol 2002;118:742–748.Google Scholar
13.Roosendaal, R, Kuipers, EJ, van den Brule, AJC, et al.Importance of fiberoptic endoscope cleaning procedure for detection of Helicobacter pylori in gastric biopsy specimens by PCR. J Clin Microbiol 1994;32:1123–1126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Spach, DH, Silverstein, FE, Stamm, WE. Transmission of infection by gastrointestinal endoscopy and bronchoscopy. Ann Intern Med 1993;118:117–128.Google Scholar
15.Kaczmarek, RG, Moore, RM, McCrohan, J. Multi-state investigation of the actual disinfections/sterilization of endoscopes in health care facilities. Am J Med 1992;92:257–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Rutala, WASelection and use of disinfectants in health care. In: Mayhall, CG, ed. Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Control. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1996:913–936.Google Scholar
17.Ehrbar, HU, Bauerfeind, P, Dutly, F, Koelz, HR, Altwegg, M. PCR-positive tests for Tropheryma whippelii in patients without Whipple's disease. Lancet 1999;353:2214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Maiwald, M, von Herbay, A, Persing, DH, et al.Tropheryma whippelii DNA is rare in the intestinal mucosa of patients without other evidence of Whipple disease. Ann Intern Med 2001;134:115–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Hanson, PJV, Gor, D, Clarke, JR, et al.Contamination of endoscopes used in AIDS patients. Lancet 1989;2:86–88.Google Scholar
20.Vesley, D, Norlien, KG, Nelson, B, Ott, B, Steifel, AJ. Significant factors in the disinfections and sterilization of flexible endoscopes. Am J Infect Control 1992;20:291–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Walsh, SE, Maillard, JY, Russell, AD, Hann, AC. Possible mechanisms for the relative efficacies of ortho-phtalaldehyde and glutaraldehyde against glutaraldehyde-resistant Mycobacterium chelonae. J Appl Microbiol 2001;91:80–92.Google Scholar