No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Evaluation of Integrity of Gloves Used in a Flow Cytometry Laboratory
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 January 2015
Abstract
This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of normal use on latex glove integrity in a flow cytometry laboratory. The gloves were tested using the 1,000 μL watertight test and met industrial standards (less than 4% leakage) before, but not after, use. More durable gloves, or more frequent changes of gloves, may be needed to ensure adequate barrier protection for laboratory workers during routine procedures.
- Type
- Concise Communications
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1997
References
2.
Centers for Disease Control. Update: recommendations for prevention of HIV transmission in healthcare settings. MMWR
1987;254:3023–3161.Google Scholar
3.
Kotilainen, HR, Brinker, JP, Avato, JL, Gantz, NM. Latex and vinyl examination gloves: quality control procedures and implications for health care workers. Arch Intern Med
1989;149:2749–2753.Google Scholar
4.
Yangco, BG, Yangco, NF. What is leaky can be risky: a study of the integrity of hospital gloves. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol
1989;10:553–556.Google Scholar
5.
US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration. Patient examination gloves and surgeons' gloves; sample plans and test method for leakage defects; adulteration. Federal Register December 12, 1990;55:51254–51258. Guide 7124.31, Chapter 24—Devices. 1991:1-3.Google Scholar
6.
Korniewicz, D, Laughon, B, Butz, A, Larson, E. Integrity of vinyl and latex procedure gloves. Nurs Res
1988;38:144–146.Google Scholar
7.
Korniewicz, D, Kirwin, M, Cresci, K, Markut, C, Larson, E. In-use comparison of latex gloves in two high risk units: surgical intensive care and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Heart Lung
1992;21:81–84.Google Scholar
9.
US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration; (21 CFR 800.20). Federal Register Chapter 1;993:7–10.Google Scholar