Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:19:58.231Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evidence of Nosocomial Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Cross-Infection in a Neonatology Unit Analyzed by Three Molecular Typing Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Carolyn VanCouwenberghe
Carolyn VanCouwenberghe*
Affiliation:
California State University-Sacramento University of California Davis Sacramento, California
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters to the Editor
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 21 , Issue 7 , July 2000 , pp. 433
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2000

References

1. Garcia de Viedma, D, Marin, M, Cercenado, E, Alonso, R, Rodriguez-Creixems, M, Bouza, E. Evidence of nosocomial Stenotrophomonas maltophiliacross-infection in a neonatology unit analyzed by three molecular typing methods. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:816–820.Google Scholar
2. VanCouwenberghe, CJ, Cohen, S. Analysis of epidemic and endemic isolates of Xanthomonas maltophilia by contour-clamped homogeneous electric field gel electrophoresis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1994;15:691–696.Google Scholar
3. VanCouwenberghe, CJ, Cohen, SH, Tang, YJ, Gumerlock, PH, Silva, JS. Genomic fingerprinting of epidemic and endemic strains of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (formerly Xanthomonas maltophilia) by arbitrarily primed PCR. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:1289–1291.Google Scholar
4. VanCouwenberghe, CJ, Farver, TB, Cohen, SH. Risk factors associated with isolation of Stenotrophomonas (Xanthomonas) maltophilia in clinical specimens. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1997;18:316–321.Google Scholar