Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:23:27.037Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Heat-and-Moisture Exchangers Used With Biweekly Circuit Tubing Changes: Effect on Costs and Pneumonia Rates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Charles Salemi*
Affiliation:
Departments of Internal Medicine and Respiratory Therapy, Kaiser Permanente Southern California Medical Group, Fontana, California Department of Infection Control, Kaiser Permanente Hospital, Fontana, California
Sally Padilla
Affiliation:
Departments of Internal Medicine and Respiratory Therapy, Kaiser Permanente Southern California Medical Group, Fontana, California Department of Infection Control, Kaiser Permanente Hospital, Fontana, California
Teresa Canola
Affiliation:
Departments of Internal Medicine and Respiratory Therapy, Kaiser Permanente Southern California Medical Group, Fontana, California Department of Infection Control, Kaiser Permanente Hospital, Fontana, California
David Reynolds
Affiliation:
Departments of Internal Medicine and Respiratory Therapy, Kaiser Permanente Southern California Medical Group, Fontana, California Department of Infection Control, Kaiser Permanente Hospital, Fontana, California
*
Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, 9961 Sierra Ave, Fontana, CA 92335

Abstract

In 1991, heat-and-moisture exchangers were introduced with biweekly ventilator circuit tubing changes, resulting in elimination of multiple pieces of respiratory equipment and reduced labor costs. The annual savings were $157,000, totalling $1.5 million since the onset of the program. There have been no increases in rates of ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Type
Concise Communications
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for prevention of nosocomial pneumonia. MMWR 1997;46(RR-1):179.Google Scholar
2.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Public health focus: surveillance, prevention, and control of nosocomial infections. MMWR 1992;41:783784.Google Scholar
3.Cook, D, De Jonghe, B, Brochard, L, Brun-Buisson, C. Influence of airway management on ventilator-associated pneumonia: evidence from randomized trials. JAMA 1998;279:781787.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Kollef, MH, Shapiro, SD, Boyd, V, Silver, P, Von Harz, B, Troviflion, E, et al. A randomized clinical trial comparing an extended-use hygroscopic condenser humidifier with heated-water humidification in mechanically ventilated patients. Chest 1998;113:759767.Google Scholar
5.Fink, JB, Krause, SA, Barrett, L, Schaaff, D, Alex, CG. Extending ventilator circuit change interval beyond 2 days reduces the likelihood of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Chest 1998;113:405411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Kotilainen, HR, Keroack, MACost analysis and clinical impact of weekly ventilator circuit changes in patients in intensive care unit. Am J Infect Control 1997;25:117120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Kirton, OC, DeHaven, B, Morgan, J, Morejon, O, Civetta, J. A prospective, randomized comparison of an in-line heat moisture exchange filter and heated wire humidifiers: rates of ventilator-associated early-onset (community-acquired) or late-onset (hospital-acquired) pneumonia and incidence of endotracheal tube occlusion. Chest 1997;112:10551059.Google Scholar