Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:35:48.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of Surveillance Technique on Reported Rates of Surgical Site Infection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2015

Heather Young ,
Sara M. Reese ,
Bryan Knepper  and
Connie S. Price
Heather Young*
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Denver Health Medical Center and University of Colorado, Denver
Sara M. Reese
Affiliation:
Department of Patient Safety & Quality, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver.
Bryan Knepper
Affiliation:
Department of Patient Safety & Quality, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver.
Connie S. Price
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Denver Health Medical Center and University of Colorado, Denver
*
Address correspondence to Heather Young, MD, 660 Bannock St., MC 4000, Denver CO 80204 (heather.young2@dhha.org).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Surgical site infection (SSI) surveillance methods vary among infection preventionists. An online survey regarding SSI surveillance technique was administered to infection preventionists and linked to superficial and complex colon SSI rates. Higher superficial but not complex SSI rates were reported when more SSI surveillance techniques were used (P <.0001).

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015;00(0): 1–3

Type
Concise Communications
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 36 , Supplement 5 , May 2015 , pp. 594 - 596
Copyright
© 2015 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Presented in part: SHEA Spring 2014 Conference; Denver, Colorado; April 4, 2014.

References

1. Horan, TC, Andrus, M, Dudeck, MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control 2008;36:309–332.Google Scholar
2. Anderson, DJ, Podgorny, K, Berrios-Torres, SI, et al. Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014;35:S66–S88.Google Scholar
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. January 2015. Procedure-associated module: SSI. http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/PDFs/pscManual/9pscSSIcurrent.pdf.Google Scholar
4. Department of Health and Human Services. Hospital inpatient prospective payment systems for acute care hospitals and the long-term care hospital prospective payment system and FY 2012 rates; hospitals' FTE resident caps for graduate medical education payment. 42 CFR Parts 412, 413, and 476; 2011. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-08-18/pdf/2011-19719.pdf.Google Scholar
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. State-based HAI prevention. http://www.cdc.gov/hai/stateplans/required-to-report-hai-NHSN.html#. Accessed Dec 10, 2014.Google Scholar
6. Mannien, J, van den Hof, S, Brandt, C, Behnke, M, Wille, JC, Gastmeier, P. Comparison of the National Surgical Site Infection surveillance data between the Netherlands and Germany: PREZIES versus KISS. J Hosp Infect 2007;66:224–231.Google Scholar
7. Barnes, S, Salemi, C, Fithian, D, et al. An enhanced benchmark for prosthetic joint replacement infection rates. Am J Infect Control 2006;34:669–672.Google Scholar
8. Avato, JL, Lai, KK. Impact of postdischarge surveillance on surgical-site infection rates for coronary artery bypass procedures. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002;23:364–367.Google Scholar
9. Sands, K, Vineyard, G, Platt, R. Surgical site infections occurring after hospital discharge. J Infect Dis 1996;173:963–970.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Anderson, DJ, Chen, LF, Sexton, DJ, Kaye, KS. Complex surgical site infections and the devilish details of risk adjustment: important implications for public reporting. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29:941–946.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Reese, S, Price, C, Knepper, B, Young, H. An evaluation of surgical site infection surveillance for colon surgery and hysterectomy in Colorado hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol (in press).Google Scholar
12. Shiloach, M, Frencher, SK Jr., Steeger, JE, et al. Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 2010;210:6–16.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Young supplementary material

Young supplementary material 1

Download Young supplementary material(File)
File 135.9 KB