Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:49:30.594Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Programs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

David Birnbaum
David Birnbaum*
Affiliation:
Victoria General Hospital, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
*
Victoria General Hospital, 35 Helmcken Road, Victoria, British Columbia V8Z 6R5, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Over 20 years ago, Philip Brachman advised us that “… the surveillance of all institutionally associated infections is important in order to minimize the risk of infection to all patients entering the institution and to members of the community.” Seven years later, in 1970, other staff members at the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) offered us more specific surveillance objectives:

A. To determine the frequency and kinds of endemic nosocomial infections, in order to identify deviations from the baseline so that infection control personnel can:

1. Determine where studies are needed.

2. Ascertain where control measures (long-term and emergency) need to be established and how effective new control measures are.

3. Establish policy.

B. To provide the patient and personnel (and in some instances the community) with all possible protection from infections of nosocomial origin.

C. To meet the requirements of the Joint Commission on Accreditation and the medical-legal guidelines of “accepted standards of patient care.”

D. To provide the medical and nursing staff with meaningful data on the level of nosocomial infection in their work areas.

If each single nosocomial infection represented sufficient deviation from the baseline occurrence, then analysis of surveillance data would be quite straightforward. However, that is not the case. A 1976 project report for the National Center for Health Statistics identified various “sentinel health events” whose occurrence should trigger “… scientific search for remediable underlying causes.”

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 8 , Issue 11 , November 1987 , pp. 474 - 479
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Brachman, PS: Surveillance of institutionally acquired infections, in Proceedings of the National Conference on institutionally Acquired Infections, Sept. 4-6, 1963. US Government Printing Office, 1964 (DHEW Publication no. (PHS) 1188) pp 138–147.Google Scholar
2. Garner, J, Bennet, J, Sheckler, W, et al: Surveillance of nosocomial infections, in Brachman, PS, Eickhoff, TC (eds): Proceedings of the International Conference on Nosocomial Infections, August 3-6, 1970. Chicago, American Hospital Association, 1971, pp 277–281.Google Scholar
3. Rutstein, DD, Berenberg, W, Chalmers, TC, et al: Measuring the quality of medical care—A clinical method. N Engl J Med 1976;294(11):582–588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. McGowan, JE Jr Parrott, PL, Duty, VP: Nosocomial bacteremia—Potential for prevention of procedure-related cases. JAMA 1977;237(25):2727–2729.Google Scholar
5. Haley, RW: Managing Hospital Infection Control for Cost-effectiveness. American Hospital Publishing Inc, Chicago, 1986.Google Scholar
6. Proceedings of the Second ICI/Stuart Workshop: The Irreducible Minimum. Infect Control 1986;7(2 Suppl):91–152.Google Scholar
7. Haley, RW, Tenney, JH, Lindsey, JD III et al: How frequent are outbreaks of nosocomial infection in community hospitals? Infect Control 1985;6(6):233–236.Google Scholar
8. Schifman, RB, Palmer, RA: Surveillance of nosocomial infections by computer analysis of positive culture rates. J Clin Microbiol 1985;21(4):493–495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Loss, SL, Goodloe, S Jr: Follow-up on nosocomial infections on nursing units. QRB 1986;12(7):243–247.Google Scholar
10. Manual for the Control of Commumuble Disease. State of California. 1971.Google Scholar
11. Schaberg, DR, Haley, RW, Highsmith, AK, et al: Nosocomial bacteriuria—A prospective study of case clustering and antimicrobial resistance. Ann Intern Med 1980;93:420–424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. McCuckin, M, Abrutyn, E: A surveillance method for early detection of nosocomial outbreaks. Am J Infect Control 1979;7:18–21.Google Scholar
13. American Society for Quality Control: Sampling procedures & tables for inspection by attributes. American National Standards Institute, standard no. Z1.4-1980.Google Scholar
14. Birnbaum, D: Analysis of hospital infection surveillance data. Infect Control 1984;5:332–338.Google Scholar
15. Morrison, AJ, Kaiser, DL, Wenzel, RP: Measurement of the efficacy of nosocomial infection control using the 95% confidence interval for infection rates. Poster #1134, 26th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, New Orleans, 28 Sept.-l Oct. 1986.Google Scholar
16. Haley, RW: The significance of fluctuations in infection rates (letter). Infect Control 1986;7(1):10.Google Scholar
17. Garvey, JM, Buffenmyer, C, Rycheck, RR, et al: Surveillance for postoperative infections in outpatient gynecologic surgery. Infect Control 1986;7:54–58.Google Scholar
18. Craig, CP: Infection surveillance for ambulatory surgery patients: An overview. QRB 1983; Apr.:107–111.Google Scholar
19. Evans, RS, Larson, RA, Burke, JA, et al: Computer surveillance of hospital-acquired infections with antibiotic use. JAMA 1986;256(8):1007–1011.Google Scholar