Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:28:36.257Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pseudoepidemic of Endocarditis in Patients Undergoing Open Heart Surgery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2016

Robert C. Aber  and
Peter C. Appelbaum
Robert C. Aber
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Pathology, The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center of The Pennsylvania Slate University, College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center of The Pennsylvania Slate University, College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
Peter C. Appelbaum
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Pathology, The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center of The Pennsylvania Slate University, College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center of The Pennsylvania Slate University, College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Between July 2 and July 16, 1979, three patients were reported to have gram-positive cocci as seen on Gram stain of excised, macerated heart valve tissue. No organisms were isolated in culture; however, our usual procedure for handling such valves is not adequate for isolation of strict anaerobes. The first patient was treated for presumed endocarditis; this resulted in three additional weeks of hospitalization.

Review of the remaining 34 patients who had heart valve replacement surgery between February 1 and July 20, 1979 revealed three additional cases.

Careful analysis revealed that nonviable, gram-positive cocci present in commercially prepared trypticase soy broth were being added to the tissue just prior to mortar and pestle grinding in the microbiology laboratory. The contaminated tubes were noted to have a visible sediment when carefully examined.

The procedure for handling the broth has been revised; a simple screening procedure is used now to identify potentially contaminated broth. No further instances of false positive results on Gram-staining of heart value tissue have occurred since this screening procedure was introduced.

Type
Research Article
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , April 1980 , pp. 97 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Weinstein, RA, Stamm, WE. Pseudoepidemics in hospital. Lancet 2:862–864, 1977.Google Scholar
2.Hoffman, PC, Arnow, PM. Goldmann, DA, et al.False positive blood cultures—association with nonsterile blood collection tubes. JAMA 236:2073–2075, 1976.Google Scholar
3.Weinstein, RA, Bauer, FW, Hoffman, RDet al.Factitious meningitis—diagnostic error due to nonviable bacteria in commercial lumbar puncture trays. JAMA 233:878–879, 1975.Google Scholar
4.Hoke, CH Jr, Batt, JM, Mirrett, S, et al.False-positive Gram-stained smears. JAMA 241:478–480, 1979.Google Scholar
5.Ericsson, CD, Carmichael, M, Pickering, LK, et al.Erroneous diagnosis of meningitis due to false-positive Gram stains. South Med J 71:1524–1525, 1978.Google Scholar
6.Weinstein, RA, Stamm, WE, Anderson, RL. Early detection of false-positive acid-fast smears. Lancet a:173–174, 1975.Google Scholar
7.Musher, DM, Schell, RF. False-positive Gram stains of cerebrospinal fluid. Ann Int Med 79:603–604, 1973.Google Scholar