Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T03:47:38.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Quality Management Project in 8 Selected Hospitals to Reduce Nosocomial Infections: A Prospective, Controlled Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Petra Gastmeier ,
Helga Bräuer ,
Dietmar Forster ,
Eckehard Dietz ,
Franz Daschner  and
Henning Rüden
Petra Gastmeier*
Affiliation:
Institute for Hygiene, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Helga Bräuer
Affiliation:
Institute for Hygiene, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Dietmar Forster
Affiliation:
Institute for Environmental Medicine and Hospital Hygiene, Albert-Ludwigs-University, Freiburg, Germany
Eckehard Dietz
Affiliation:
Institute for Hygiene, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Franz Daschner
Affiliation:
Institute for Environmental Medicine and Hospital Hygiene, Albert-Ludwigs-University, Freiburg, Germany
Henning Rüden
Affiliation:
Institute for Hygiene, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
*
Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hospital Epidemiology, Medical School Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30 625 Hannover, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To reduce the number of nosocomial infections (NIs) in surgical patients by a quality management approach.

Design:

Prospective, controlled study in 8 medium-sized hospitals during a 26-month period.

Setting:

Four study hospitals and 4 control hospitals.

Methods:

In two 10-month intervention periods, 4 external physicians introduced quality circles and ongoing surveillance in the 4 study hospitals. There were three 8-week observation periods in all 8 hospitals with the same physicians before, during, and after the intervention periods.

Results:

During the first observation period, almost identical overall incidence densities were found for the study hospitals and the control hospitals. During the course of the study, the overall incidence density decreased significantly in the study hospitals (risk ratio [RR], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI95], 0.59 to 0.94) and nonsignificantly in the control hospitals (RR, 0.90; CI95 0.70 to 1.16). With the use of a Cox regression model to evaluate the impact of the intervention periods while taking into account the distribution of risk factors for NI in both groups, a significant risk reduction (RR, 0.75; CI95, 0.58 to 0.97) was observed after the first intervention period when comparing study and control hospitals. At the end of the study (ie, after the second intervention period), the difference between the study hospitals and the control hospitals was not significant (RR, 0.78; CI95, 0.60 to 1.01). This was due to no further improvement at the end of the study in the study hospitals and a decrease in the control hospitals.

Conclusion:

This study demonstrates that NI rates can be significantly reduced by appropriate intervention methods in hospitals that are interested in quality management activities. However, continuous intense efforts are necessary to maintain these improvements.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , February 2002 , pp. 91 - 97
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Haley, RW, Culver, DH, White, JW, et al. The efficacy of infection control programs in preventing nosocomial infections in U.S. hospitals. Am J Epidemiol 1985;212:182–205.Google Scholar
2.Olson, MM, Lee, JT. Continuous, 10 year wound infection surveillance: results, advantages and unanswered questions. Arch Surg 1990;125:794–803.Google Scholar
3.Kelleghan, SI, Salemi, C, Padilla, S, et al. An effective continuous quality improvement approach to the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Am J Inject Control 1993;21:322–330.Google Scholar
4.Gaynes, RP, Solomon, S. Improving hospital-acquired infection rates. Journal of Quality Improvement 1996;22:457–467.Google Scholar
5.Dumigan, D, Kohan, C, Reed, C, Jekel, J, Fikrig, M. Utilizing National Nosocomial Infections System data to improve urinary tract infection rates in three intensive care units. Clinical Performance and Quality Health Care 1998;6:172–178.Google Scholar
6.Goetz, A, Kedzuf, S, Wagener, M, Muder, RR. Feedback to nursing staff as an intervention to reduce catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Am J Infect Control 1999;27:402–404.Google Scholar
7.Bishop-Kurylo, D. The clinical experience of continuous quality improvement in the neonatal intensive care unit. Journal of Perinatal and Neonatal Nursing 1998;12:51–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.McConkey, S, L'Ecuyer, P, Murphy, D, Leet, T, Sundt, T, Fraser, V. Results of a comprehensive infection control program for reducing surgical-site infections in coronary artery bypass surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:533–538.Google Scholar
9.Eggimann, P, Harbarth, S, Constantin, M-N, Touvenau, S, Chevrolet, J-C, Pittet, D. Impact of a prevention strategy targeted at vascular-access care on incidence of infections acquired in intensive care. Lancet 2000;355:1864–1868.Google Scholar
10.Scheckler, W, Brimhall, D, Buck, A, et al. Requirements for infrastructure and essential activities of infection control and epidemiology in hospitals: a consensus panel report. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998;19:114–124.Google Scholar
11.Forster, DH, Krause, G, Gastmeier, Pet al. Can quality circles improve nosocomial infection control? J Hosp Infect 2000;45:302–310.Google Scholar
12.Emori, TG, Culver, DH, Horan, TC, et al. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System (NNIS): description of surveillance methodology. Am J Infect Control 1991;19:19–35.Google Scholar
13.Garner, JS, Emori, WR, Horan, TC, Hughes, JM. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections. Am J Infect Control 1988;16:128–140.Google Scholar
14.Horan, TC, Gaynes, RP, Martone, WJ, Jarvis, WR, Emori, TG. CDC definitions of surgical site infections: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992;13:606–608.Google Scholar
15.McCabe, WR, Jackson, GJ. Gram-negative bacteremia: etiology, ecology, clinical laboratory and therapeutic observations. Arch Intern Med 1962;110:847–864.Google Scholar
16.Gastmeier, P, Geffers, C, Daschner, F, Ruden, H. Diagnostic training in the surveillance of nosocomial infections: what is feasible and useful? Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed. 1998;201:153–166.Google Scholar
17.Pittet, D, Hugonnet, S, Harbarth, S, et al. Effectiveness of a hospital-wide programme to improve compliance with hand hygiene. Lancet 2000;356:1307–1312.Google Scholar
18.Gastmeier, P, Sohr, D, Rath, A, et al. Repeated prevalence investigations on nosocomial infections for continuous surveillance. J Hosp Infect 2000;45:47–53.Google Scholar
19.Gastmeier, P, Kampf, G, Hauer, T, et al. Experience with two validation methods in a prevalence survey on nosocomial infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998;19:668–673.Google Scholar
20.Ayliffe, GAJ. Nosocomial infection: the irreducible minimum. Infect Control 1986;7:92–95.Google Scholar
21.Quality Indicator Study Group. An approach to the evaluation of quality indicators of the outcome of care in hospitalized patients with a focus on nosocomial infection indicators. Am J Infect Control 1995;23:215–222.Google Scholar
22.Greco, D, Moro, ML, Tozzi, AE, De Giacomi, GV, and the Italian PRINOS Study Group. Effectiveness of an intervention program in reducing postoperative infections. Am J Med 1991;91 (suppl 3B):164S–169S.Google Scholar