Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:34:09.617Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Real-Life Snapshot of the Use and Abuse of Urinary Catheters on General Medical Wards

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Geoffrey Harley ,
Ai Li Yeo ,
Rhonda L. Stuart  and
Claire Dendle
Geoffrey Harley
Affiliation:
Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
Ai Li Yeo
Affiliation:
Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
Rhonda L. Stuart
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
Claire Dendle*
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia Southern Clinical School, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
*
Department of Infectious Diseases, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia (daire.dendle@monash.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An observational study was performed on 2 wards in a tertiary hospital to determine staff awareness, knowledge, and documentation of catheter use and the effects these have on duration of catheterization. Overall, there was poor knowledge of the indications and date of catheterization. Doctor awareness decreases duration of catheterization.

Type
Concise Communications
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 32 , Issue 12 , December 2011 , pp. 1216 - 1218
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

These authors contributed equally to this work.

References

1. Foxman, B, Brown, R Epidemiology of urinary tract infections: incidence, morbidity, and economic costs. Infect Dis Clin N Am 2003;17(2):227–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Saint, S, Kowalski, CP, Kaufman, SR, et al. Preventing hospital-acquired urinary tract infection in the United States: a national study. Clin Infect Dis 2008;46(2):243–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Lo, E, Nicolle, L, Classen, D, et al. Strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections in acute care hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29(suppl 1):S41–S50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Maki, DG, Tambyah, PA. Engineering out the risk for infection with urinary catheters. Emerg Infect Dis 2001;7(2):342–347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Meddings, J, Rogers, MA, Macy, M, Saint, S. Systematic review and meta-analysis: reminder systems to reduce catheter-associated urinary tract infections and urinary catheter use in hospitalized patients. Clin Infect Dis 2010;51(5):550–560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Jain, P, Parada, J, David, A, Smith, LG. Overuse of the indwelling urinary tract catheter in hospitalized medical patients. Arch Intern Med 1995;155(13):1425–1429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed