Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:13:13.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reduction of Environmental Contamination With Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria by Copper-Alloy Coating of Surfaces in a Highly Endemic Setting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2017

Maria Souli*
Affiliation:
4th Department of Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, University General Hospital Attikon, Athens, Greece
Anastasia Antoniadou
Affiliation:
4th Department of Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, University General Hospital Attikon, Athens, Greece
Ioannis Katsarolis
Affiliation:
4th Department of Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, University General Hospital Attikon, Athens, Greece
Irini Mavrou
Affiliation:
2nd Department of Critical Care, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, University General Hospital Attikon, Athens, Greece
Elisabeth Paramythiotou
Affiliation:
2nd Department of Critical Care, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, University General Hospital Attikon, Athens, Greece
Evangelos Papadomichelakis
Affiliation:
2nd Department of Critical Care, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, University General Hospital Attikon, Athens, Greece
Maria Drogari-Apiranthitou
Affiliation:
4th Department of Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, University General Hospital Attikon, Athens, Greece
Theofano Panagea
Affiliation:
4th Department of Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, University General Hospital Attikon, Athens, Greece Present affiliation: Department of Microbiology, Sismanogleio-A. Fleming General Hospital, Division A. Fleming, Athens, Greece
Helen Giamarellou
Affiliation:
6th Department of Internal Medicine, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Center of Athens “Hygeia,”Athens, Greece.
George Petrikkos
Affiliation:
4th Department of Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, University General Hospital Attikon, Athens, Greece
Apostolos Armaganidis
Affiliation:
2nd Department of Critical Care, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, University General Hospital Attikon, Athens, Greece
*
Address correspondence to Maria Souli, 4th Department of Internal Medicine, University General Hospital Attikon, 1 Rimini Str. 124 62 Chaidari, Athens, Greece (msouli@med.uoa.gr).

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of copper-coating in reducing environmental colonization in an intensive-care unit (ICU) with multidrug-resistant-organism (MDRO) endemicity

DESIGN

Interventional, comparative crossover trial

SETTING

The general ICU of Attikon University hospital in Athens, Greece

PATIENTS

Those admitted to ICU compartments A and B during the study period

METHODS

Before any intervention (phase 1), the optimum sampling method using 2 nylon swabs was validated. In phase 2, 6 copper-coated beds (ie, with coated upper, lower, and side rails) and accessories (ie, coated side table, intravenous [i.v.] pole stands, side-cart handles, and manual antiseptic dispenser cover) were introduced as follows: During phase 2a (September 2011 to February 2012), coated items were placed next to noncoated ones (controls) in both compartments A and B; during phase 2b (May 2012 to January 2013), all copper-coated items were placed in compartment A, and all noncoated ones (controls) in compartment B. Patients were randomly assigned to available beds. Environmental samples were cultured quantitatively for clinically important bacteria. Clinical and demographic data were collected from medical records.

RESULTS

Copper coating significantly reduced the percentage of colonized surfaces (55.6% vs 72.5%; P<.0001), the percentage of surfaces colonized by MDR gram-negative bacteria (13.8% vs 22.7%; P=.003) or by enterococci (4% vs 17%; P=.014), the total bioburden (2,858 vs 7,631 cfu/100 cm2; P=.008), and the bioburden of gram-negative isolates, specifically (261 vs 1,266 cfu/100 cm2; P=.049). This effect was more pronounced when the ratio of coated surfaces around the patient was increased (phase 2b).

CONCLUSIONS

Copper-coated items in an ICU setting with endemic high antimicrobial resistance reduced environmental colonization by MDROs.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:765–771

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
© 2017 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

PREVIOUS PRESENTATION. These data were presented in part at the 52nd Interscience Conference of Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, San Francisco, California, on September 9, 2012 (Abstracts K245 and K246).

References

REFERENCES

1. Weber, DJ, Anderson, D, Rutala, WA. The role of the surface environment in healthcare-associated infections. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2013;26:338344.Google Scholar
2. Siegel, JD, Rhinehart, E, Jackson, M, Chiarello, L. Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Management of multidrug resistant organisms in health-care settings, 2006. Am J Infect Control 2007;35(10 Suppl 2):S165S193.Google Scholar
3. Manian, FA, Griesenauer, S, Senkel, D, et al. Isolation of Acinetobacter baumannii complex and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from hospital rooms following terminal cleaning and disinfection: can we do better? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32:667672.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Weber, DJ, Rutala, WA. Self-disinfecting surfaces: review of current methodologies and future prospects. Am J Infect Control 2013;41(5 Suppl):S31S35.Google Scholar
5. Souli, M, Galani, I, Plachouras, D, et al. Antimicrobial activity of copper surfaces against carbapenemase-producing contemporary gram-negative clinical isolates. J Antimicrob Chemother 2013;68:852857.Google Scholar
6. Environmental Protection Agency registers copper-containing alloy products. United States Environmental Protection Agency website. http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/factsheets/copper-alloy-products.htm. Published 2008. Accessed November 26, 2016.Google Scholar
7. Casey, AL, Adams, D, Karpanen, TJ, et al. Role of copper in reducing hospital environment contamination. J Hosp Infect 2010;74:7277.Google Scholar
8. Marais, F, Mehtar, S, Chalkley, L. Antimicrobial efficacy of copper touch surfaces in reducing environmental bioburden in a South African community healthcare facility. J Hosp Infect 2010;74:8081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Mikolay, A, Huggett, S, Tikana, L, et al. Survival of bacteria on metallic copper surfaces in a hospital trial. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2010;87:18751879.Google Scholar
10. Rai, S, Hirsch, BE, Attaway, HH, et al. Evolution of the antimicrobial properties of copper surfaces in an outpatient infectious disease practice. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33:200201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Karpanen, TJ, Casey, AL, Lambert, PA, et al. The antimicrobial efficacy of copper alloy furnishing in the clinical environment: a crossover study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33:39.Google Scholar
12. Schmidt, MG, von Dessauer, B, Benavente, C, et al. Copper surfaces are associated with significantly lower concentrations of bacteria on selected surfaces within a pediatric intensive care unit. Am J Infect Control 2016;44:203209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Hinsa-Leasure, SM, Nartey, Q, Vaverka, J, Schmidt, MG. Copper alloy surfaces sustain terminal cleaning levels in a rural hospital. Am J Infect Control 2016;44:e195e203.Google Scholar
14. Salgado, CD, Sepkowitz, KA, John, JF, et al. Copper surfaces reduce the rate of healthcare-acquired infections in the intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34:479486.Google Scholar
15. von Dessauer, B, Navarrete, MS, Benadof, D, Benavente, C, Schmidt, MG. Potential effectiveness of copper surfaces in reducing health care–associated infection rates in a pediatric intensive and intermediate care unit: a nonrandomized controlled trial. Am J Infect Control 2016;44:e133e139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Sifri, CD, Burke, GH, Enfield, KB. Reduced health care–associated infections in an acute care community hospital using a combination of self-disinfecting copper-impregnated composite hard surfaces and linens. Am J Infect Control 2016 Sep 28. pii: S0196-6553(16)30696–4.Google Scholar
17. Koratzanis, E, Souli, M, Galani, I, Chryssouli, Z, Armaganidis, A, Giamarellou, H. Epidemiology and molecular characterization of metallo-β-lactamase–producing Enterobacteriaceae in a University Hospital Intensive Care Unit in Greece. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2011;38:390397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. WHO guidelines on hand hygiene in health-care: observation tool. World Health Organization website. http://www.who.int/gpsc/5may/tools/en/. Published 2009. Accessed November 26, 2016.Google Scholar
19. Hedin, G, Rynbäck, J, Loré, B. New technique to take samples from environmental surfaces using flocked nylon swabs. J Hosp Infect 2010;75:314317.Google Scholar
20. Schmidt, MG, Attaway, HH, Sharpe, PA, et al. Sustained reduction of microbial burden on common hospital surfaces through introduction of copper. J Clin Microbiol 2012;50:22172223.Google Scholar
21. Magiorakos, AP, Srinivasan, A, Carey, RB, et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect 2012;18:268281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Dancer, SJ. Hospital cleaning in the 21st century. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2011;30:14731481.Google Scholar
23. Michels, HT, Keevil, CW, Saldago, CD, Schmidt, MG. From laboratory research to a clinical trial: copper alloy surfaces kill bacteria and reduce hospital-acquired infections. HERD 2015;9:6479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Souli supplementary material

Tables S1 and S2

Download Souli supplementary material(File)
File 14 KB