Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T19:09:30.457Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reply to Parcell et al

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Vineet Chopra  and
Nasia Safdar
Vineet Chopra*
Affiliation:
Patient Safety Enhancement Program, Hospital Outcomes Program of Excellence and Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Nasia Safdar
Affiliation:
William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Medical School and Infection Control Department, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
*
2800 Plymouth Road, Building 16, Room 432W, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 (vineetc@umich.edu)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters to the Editor
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 34 , Issue 12 , December 2013 , pp. 1329 - 1330
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2013

References

1.Parcell, BJ, Ratnayake, L, Zealley, I, Phillips, G. Development of a core team for the management of peripherally inserted central catheters. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34(12):1328–1329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Chopra, V, O'Horo, JC, Rogers, MA, Maki, DG, Safdar, N. The risk of bloodstream infection associated with peripherally inserted central catheters compared with central venous catheters in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34(9):908–918.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Chopra, V, Anand, S, Krein, SL, Chenoweth, C, Saint, S. Bloodstream infection, venous thrombosis, and peripherally inserted central catheters: reappraising the evidence. Am J Mecd 2012;125(8):733–741.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Advani, S, Reich, NG, Sengupta, A, Gosey, L, Milstone, AM. Central line-associated bloodstream infection in hospitalized children with peripherally inserted central venous catheters: extending risk analyses outside the intensive care unit. Clin Infect Dis 2011;52(9):1108–1115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Chopra, V, Flanders, SA, Saint, S. The problem with peripherally inserted central catheters. JAMA 2012;308(15):1527–1528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Meyer, BM. Developing an alternative workflow model for peripherally inserted central catheter placement. JInfus Nurs 2012;35(1):34–42.Google ScholarPubMed
7.Harnage, SA. Achieving zero catheter related blood stream infections: 15 months success in a community based medical center. J Assoc Vase Access 2007;12(4):218–224.Google Scholar
8.Wojnar, DG, Beaman, ML. Peripherally inserted central catheter: compliance with evidence-based indications for insertion in an inpatient setting. J Infus Nurs 2013;36(4):291–296.Google Scholar
9.Ober, S, Craven, G. Infusion Nursing Standards of Practice influences the Boards of Registration in Nursing on advisory rulings regarding peripherally inserted central catheters. J Infus Nurs 2012;35(2):81–82.Google Scholar