Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:01:28.651Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The return of investment of hospital-based surgical quality improvement programs in reducing surgical site infection at a Canadian tertiary-care hospital

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2018

Sasha van Katwyk ,
Kednapa Thavorn ,
Doug Coyle ,
Husein Moloo ,
Alan J. Forster ,
Timothy Jackson  and
David Schramm
Sasha van Katwyk
Affiliation:
Clinical Epidemiology Program, the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Kednapa Thavorn*
Affiliation:
Clinical Epidemiology Program, the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Institute for Clinical and Evaluative Sciences (ICES uOttawa), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Doug Coyle
Affiliation:
School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Husein Moloo
Affiliation:
Clinical Epidemiology Program, the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, the Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Alan J. Forster
Affiliation:
Clinical Epidemiology Program, the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Institute for Clinical and Evaluative Sciences (ICES uOttawa), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Department of Medicine, the Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Timothy Jackson
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Division of General Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
David Schramm
Affiliation:
Clinical Epidemiology Program, the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
*
Author for correspondence: Kednapa Thavorn, PhD, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, 501 Smyth Road, PO Box 201B, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1H 8L6. E-mail: kthavorn@ohri.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

We performed a return-on-investment analysis comparing the investment in surgical site infection (SSI) prevention programs in a hospital setting to the savings from averted SSI cases.

Design

A retrospective case costing study using aggregated patient data to determine the incidence and costs of SSI infection in surgical departments over time. We calculated return on investment to the hospital and conducted several sensitivity and scenario analyses.

Setting

Data were compiled for the Ottawa Hospital (TOH), a Canadian tertiary-care teaching institution.

Patients

We used aggregated records for all hospital patients who underwent surgical procedures between April 2010 and January 2015.

Intervention

We estimated the potential cost savings of the hospital’s surgical quality improvement program, namely the Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) and the Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program (CUSP).

Results

From 2010 to 2016, TOH invested C$826,882 (US$624,384) in surgical quality improvement programs targeting SSI incidence and accrued C$1,885,110 (US$1,423,460) in cumulative savings from averted SSI cases, generating a return of $2.28 (US$3.02) per dollar invested (95% confidence interval [CI], −0.67 to 7.37). The study findings are sensitive to the estimated cost to the hospital per SSI case and the rate reduction attributable to the prevention program.

Conclusions

The NSQIP and CUSP have produced a positive return on investment at TOH; however, the result rests on several assumptions. This positive return on investment is expected to continue if the hospital can continue to reduce SSI incidence at least 0.25% annually without new investments. Findings from this study highlight the need for continuous program evaluation of the quality improvement initiatives.

Type
Original Article
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , February 2019 , pp. 125 - 132
Copyright
© 2018 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Cite this article: van Katwyk S, et al. (2019). The return of investment of hospital-based surgical quality improvement programs in reducing surgical site infection at a Canadian tertiary-care hospital. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 2019, 40, 125–132. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.294

References

1. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. A report from the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System, data summary from October 1986 through April 1996. Am J Infect Control 1996;24:380–388.Google Scholar
2. The Ottawa Hospital Data Warehouse. National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) data repository. Accessed August 2015.Google Scholar
3. de Vries, EN, Ramrattan, MA, Smorenburg, SM, Gouma, DJ, Boermeester, MA. The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review. Qual Saf Health Care 2008;17:216–223.Google Scholar
4. Berwick, DM, Calkins, DR, McCannon, CJ, Hackbarth, AD. The 100,000 lives campaign: setting a goal and a deadline for improving health care quality. JAMA. 2006;295:324–327.Google Scholar
5. Dellinger, EP, Hausmann, SM, Bratzler, DW, et al. Hospitals collaborate to decrease surgical site infections. Am J Surg 2005;190:9–15.Google Scholar
6. Hall, BL, Hamilton, BH, Richards, K, Bilimoria, KY, Cohen, ME, Ko, CY. Does surgical quality improve in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program? Ann Surg 2009;205:363–376.Google Scholar
7. Thanh, NX, Baron, T, Litvinchuk, S. An economic evaluation of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) in Alberta, Canada. Ann Surg 2018. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002708.Google Scholar
8. Hollenbeak, CS, Boltz, MM, Wang, L, et al. Cost-effectiveness of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg 2011;254:619–624.Google Scholar
9. Guillamondegui, OD, Gunter, OL, Hines, L, et al. Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the Tennessee Surgical Quality Collaborative to improve surgical outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 2012;214:709–716.Google Scholar
10. Osborne, NH, Nicholas, LH, Ryan, AM, Thumma, JR, Dimick, JB. Association of hospital participation in a quality reporting program with surgical outcomes and expenditures for Medicare beneficiaries. JAMA 2015;313:496–504.Google Scholar
11. Ceppa, EP, Pitt, HA, House, MG, et al. Reducing surgical site infections in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. HPB (Oxford) 2013;15:384–391.Google Scholar
12. McNelis, J, Castaldi, M. ‘The National Surgery Quality Improvement Project’ (NSQIP): a new tool to increase patient safety and cost efficiency in a surgical intensive care unit. Patient Saf Surg 2014;8:19.Google Scholar
13. Tepas, J III, Kerwin, A, deVilla, J, Nussbaum, M. Macro vs micro level surgical quality improvement: a regional collaborative demonstrates the case for a national NSQIP initiative. J Am Coll Surg 2014;218:599–604.Google Scholar
14. Ontario Case Costing Guide, version 9.0. Toronto: Data Standards Unit, Health Data Branch, Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; 2014.Google Scholar
15. Canadian Patient Cost Database technical document: MIS patient costing methodology, March 2017. Ottawa: Canadian Institute for Health Information; 2017.Google Scholar