No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Screening for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Reliability and Accuracy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 January 2015
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
- Type
- Letters to the Editor
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2011
References
1.Lucet, JC, Regnier, B. Screening and decolonization: does methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus hold lessons for methicillin-resistant S. aureus?. Clin Infect Dis 2010;51:585–590.Google Scholar
2.Singh, K, Gavin, PJ, Vescio, T, et al. Microbiologic surveillance using nasal cultures alone is sufficient for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in neonates. J Clin Microbiol 2003;41:2755–2757.Google Scholar
3.Rosenthal, A, White, D, Churilla, S, Brodie, S, Katz, KC. Optimal surveillance culture sites for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in newborns. J Clin Microbiol 2006;44:4234–4236.Google Scholar
4.Chen, AE, Cantey, JB, Carroll, KC, Ross, T, Speser, S, Siberry, GK. Discordance between Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization and skin infections in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2009;28:244–246.Google Scholar
5.Zhang, SX, Drews, SJ, Tomassi, J, Katz, KC. Comparison of two versions of the IDI-MRSA assay using charcoal swabs for prospective nasal and non-nasal surveillance samples. J Clin Microbiol 2007;45:2278–2280.Google Scholar
6.Styers, D, Sheehan, DJ, Hogan, P, Sahm, DF. Laboratory-based surveillance of current antimicrobial resistance patterns and trends among Staphylococcus aureus: 2005 status in the United States. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 2006;5:2.Google Scholar
You have
Access