Hospitalized patients are susceptible to hospital-acquired bloodstream infections (HABSIs), which are an important cause of increased morbidity, mortality, length of stay, and hospital costs. Reference Blot, Depuydt and Annemans1,Reference Umscheid, Mitchell, Doshi, Agarwal, Williams and Brennan2 Due to their clinical and economic impact, the Belgian “Surveillance of Bloodstream Infections in Hospitals” program collects nationwide HABSI case-based data. Reference Blot, Hammami, Blot, Vogelaers and Lambert3
Recent studies have recognized that hospital-acquired infections demonstrate seasonality, particularly gram-negative bacteria. Reference Richet4 However, these studies focused on microorganisms and less on the infectious origin or the impact of climate. Seasonality is a multifactorial phenomenon associated with changes at the patient, pathogen, hospital and environmental levels. Reference Leekha, Diekema and Perencevich5 Examples include seasonal changes in the nurse-to-patient ratio, Reference He, Staggs, Bergquist-Beringer and Dunton6 survival conditions of the pathogen, host immune status, antibiotic use, Reference Suda, Hicks, Roberts, Hunkler and Taylor7,Reference Sun, Klein and Laxminarayan8 postinfluenza bacterial or fungal superinfection, Reference Tasher, Stein, Simoes, Shohat, Bromberg and Somekh9,Reference Denning and Chakrabarti10 and climate. Reference Fisman, Patrozou and Carmeli11 Unravelling the role of the underlying factors that drive infectious diseases seasonality will improve our understanding of host and pathogen ecology. This information can guide and inform infection prevention and surveillance studies.
In this study, we examined seasonal variation of monthly HABSI incidence rates based on nationally aggregated data from 2000 to 2014. A further analysis examined the influence of climate factors on HABSI incidence. To better characterize seasonality epidemiology, these analyses were stratified by HABSI and microorganism and infectious origin.
Methods
Study design and setting
A national cohort study of HABSI epidemiology was performed based on the Belgian “Surveillance data of BSI in Hospitals” program from January 2000 to December 2014. The full protocol, revised in 2013, is available online in Dutch and French (http://www.nsih.be).
Participants
Participation in the surveillance program entails case-based recording of all HABSIs for a minimum of 1 trimester per year. Participation was voluntary but became mandatory from 2014 onward. Eligible hospitals were all hospitals with >150 beds. To analyze seasonal variation, hospitals included in this cohort study performed surveillance for HABSIs (numerator) with patient day (denominator) data for a full year, that is, 4 trimesters within a calendar year, during at least 1 year.
Case definitions and variables
A laboratory-confirmed BSI requires at least 2 separate samples if the causal microorganism is a skin commensal and at least 1 sample if the causal microorganism is a recognized pathogen (Appendix 1 online). HABSIs were those not present or incubating at the time of admission to the acute-care setting (≥48 hours). An episode in the same patient caused by the same microorganism was considered a novel occurrence if 14 days elapsed between the 2 episodes. HABSI origins were classified as central-line associated; unknown origin; secondary to pulmonary, urinary, skin and soft-tissue, abdominal infection; or surgical sites. HABSI diagnosis could be classified as confirmed instead of probable when the same microorganism was cultured from the probable infectious focus. Catheter-related BSI diagnosis required a concomitant positive central venous catheter (CVC) tip and blood culture with identification of the same microorganism (Appendix 2 online). Central-line–associated BSI consisted of a BSI without microbiological confirmation but with a CVC in place within 48 hours, unrelated to an infection from another site, and considered by the clinician to originate from the CVC.
Collected data included infection onset date, infectious origin, causal microorganism(s), and university-affiliated hospital status. Denominator data included number of hospitalwide patient days and admissions per trimester. HABSI incidence was reported as a rate per 10,000 patient days.
Statistical methods
Mixed-effects negative binomial distribution regression model calculated the adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for both monthly HABSI rates. This method allowed the identification of a peak-to-low ratio between 2 months, which describes the amplitude of the seasonal pattern by comparing the month with the lowest incidence rate to the month with the highest incidence rate. Reference Christiansen, Pedersen, Sørensen and Rothman12 Further stratification analyzed incidence rate ratios for gram-positive, gram-negative, and fungal infections. The least common Enterobacter spp (E. proteus, E. serratia, E. morganella, and E. citrobacter spp) were grouped together for regression analysis. The analysis was performed hospitalwide and includes the intensive care unit. Fixed effects included year, acute versus chronic care hospitals, university hospital status, and infection risk exposure expressed as monthly patient days. Varying hospital participation and heterogeneity were accounted for by applying individual hospital units as random effects. Although denominator patient-day data were reported per trimester, it was averaged between the 3 months to allow for monthly patient-day exposure and incidence rate analysis.
Statistical significance depends on both the strength of the association and the amount of data and thus does not measure the strength of seasonal occurrence. Instead, measures that compare estimates of rates should be used. Reference Christiansen, Pedersen, Sørensen and Rothman12 To graph and describe the seasonal changes, composite monthly HABSI rates were estimated based on the regression analysis results. In this way, both the relative (incidence rate ratio) and absolute changes (mean incidence rate per patient days) could be presented. Because the regression analysis may identify a single statistically significant peak incidence within 1 month, a peak-to-low ratio comparing the seasonal peak-to-low incidence rate ratio (ie, winter to summer period) was calculated to determine whether significant variation occurred between seasons. In this manner, we were able to distinguish between a monthly outlier versus a relevant, continued, absolute incidence rate change within an entire season.
To assess the influence of climate on the infection incidence, monthly average temperature (°C), humidity (%), and precipitation (mm) from 2000 through 2014 were collected from an online data system. 13 A separate mixed-effects negative binomial regression model applied climate variables to identify associations with HABSI. A second model examined temperature and humidity per season with weather-by-season interaction terms (Appendix 3 online). Thus, we were able to distinguish between a warm versus a cold season. Reference Eber, Shardell, Schweizer, Laxminarayan and Perencevich14 Seasons were defined as winter (December–February), spring (March–May), summer (June–August), and autumn (September–November).
All statistical analyses were performed using Stata version 14 software (StataCorp, College Station, TX). The mixed-effects negative binomial regression analysis was performed with the menbreg function. Interquartile ranges (IQR) were reported as the 25th–75th percentile. Statistical significance was set at P ≤ .05; however, considering the number of analytical computations and the large data set, a P ≤ .01 should be considered more relevant to indicate statistical significance.
Results
In total, 49,021 cultured microorganisms from 44,111 HABSIs were reported by 104 hospital sites (Table 1). Selection of hospitals performing surveillance for an entire calendar year led to the exclusion of 20,034 HABSIs (31.2%). Only 63 HABSIs (0.1%) were excluded due to missing patient-day data.
Note. IQR, interquartile range.
a Seasonal data on hospitalwide mean HABSI rates per 10,000 patient days.
The hospitalwide median HABSI incidence rate was 7.0 per 10,000 patient days (IQR, 4.93–9.47), with a CLABSI rate of 1.14 per 10,000 patient days (IQR, 0.64–2.14). Monthly average ambient temperature ranged from a minimum of −0.7 to a maximum of 23°C with higher temperature during June–August. Relative humidity showed a range between 62% and to 92%, with higher percentages during December–February.
The most common pathogens consisted of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS), Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus faecalis, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. The most frequent HABSI foci were of central-line, urinary tract, pulmonary, or intra-abdominal origin (Appendix 4 online). Polymicrobial infection occurred among 4,317 (9.8%) of 44,111 HABSIs. A definite diagnosis of the infectious origin (ie, culture of the same microorganism from blood and primary infectious site) was reported among 13,636 (27.8%) of 49,021 HABSI microorganisms. Approximately one-third of HABSI cases were classified as being of unknown origin (34.1%). Appendix 5 (online) displays the distribution of microorganisms per HABSI origin. CLABSI consisted primarily of CNS, followed by gram-negative bacteria, S. aureus and Candida spp. Nearly all urinary-tract HABSIs were caused by gram-negative pathogens.
Mixed-effects regression analysis identified significant seasonal (IRR, 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18–1.26 CI; P < .001) and monthly peak-to-low relative rate changes (IRR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.34–1.50; P < .001) for total HABSIs. When stratified, this seasonality was present for most microorganisms and HABSIs per infectious origin but at varying levels of magnitude. Table 2 lists the HABSIs peak-to-low seasonal (summer-to-winter) and monthly IRRs, stratified ny microorganism and infectious origin. Gram-negative HABSIs demonstrated a larger seasonal peak-to-low ratio during the summer (IRR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.32–1.43; P < .001) compared to gram-positive pathogens (IRR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.03–1.12; P = .002).
Note. NS, non-significance; CNS, coagulase-negative staphylococci; HABSI, hospital-acquired bloodstream infections. Group of other Enterobacterales includes Proteus, Serratia, Morganella and Citrobacter spp.
a Estimates of the mixed-effects negative binomial regression model adjusted for year, acute vs chronic care hospitals, university-affiliated status, and infection risk exposure expressed as monthly patient days. Peak-to-low monthly incidence rates vary per HABSI, but the trough levels are usually in February with a peak during July–August, with the exception of S. pneumoniae. Figures 1 and 2 display these monthly peak and trough incidence rates.
b IRRs are expressed as a peak-to-low ratio between the lowest and highest incidence rate between seasons (seasonal peak-to-low ratio between winter and summer) and between months (monthly peak-to-low ratio).
Based on monthly peak-to-low IRRs, HABSI estimates were plotted to quantify absolute incidence rate seasonality (Fig. 1). Figure 1a displays the monthly incidence of all pathogens with significant monthly peak-to-low IRRs. Figure 1b illustrates monthly variation among pathogens with lower incidence rates. They display a seasonal pattern, with a trough incidence rate during February that peaks 5–6 months later in July or August. Some HABSI rates only displayed significant IRR during 1 peak month and not the entire summer, which statistically appears as a discrepancy between the seasonal and monthly peak-to-low IRR, as in the cases of S. aureus, CNS, and P. aeruginosa.
When examining Figure 1a, pathogens that displayed the clearest seasonality with a spike during July–August were CNS, E. coli, K. pneumoniae, E. cloacae, and a group of less common Enterobacterales. Despite their relatively lower peak-to-low seasonal and monthly IRRs, CNS and E. coli demonstrated important absolute rate changes (Fig. 1a). Although S. aureus demonstrated significant peak-to-low IRR increases during the summer, seasonality was less clear when examining absolute rate changes. P. aeruginosa, Acinetobacter spp, K. oxytoca, and Stenotrophomonas spp (bacteria with lower incidence rates) also demonstrated summer seasonality (Fig. 1b). S. pneumoniae displayed the opposite trend, with peaks during the winter.
HABSIs from different infectious origins also exhibited seasonal variation showing summer spikes (Table 2). The clearest examples were central-line– and urinary tract–associated HABSIs (Fig. 2). Subgroup analysis of catheter-related bloodstream infections (ie, with concomitant positive catheter tip or catheter blood culture) confirmed this seasonality. The seasonal peak-to-low IRR was statistically significant among intra-abdominal, skin and soft-tissue, and surgical site infections; however, the effect size was smaller as evidenced by the smaller absolute rate changes. HABSIs of pulmonary origin exhibited no seasonal variation. Subgroup analysis of gram-negative pulmonary HABSI showed subtle increases during the summer months (Appendix 6 online).
Table 3 describes the associations between ambient climate variables and HABSI incidence rates per microorganism or per infectious focus. Gram-negative bacteria displayed significant associations between climate and IRR both year-long and within all seasons. Those that demonstrated the highest correlation with temperature were Stenotrophomonas, Acinetobacter, and Klebsiella spp. Although P. aeruginosa displayed seasonality with summer peaks, a period that is paired with lower relative humidity, there was no positive association with ambient temperature but rather with humidity. Stenotrophomonas spp and Bacteroides spp also displayed positive associations with higher relative humidity (Table 3). Streptococcus pneumoniae incidence was negatively associated with temperature. The only type of HABSI that demonstrated clear associations with climate was CLABSI, with increased incidence at higher temperatures. Urinary tract HABSI also showed an association with temperature but with a very small effect size. Precipitation was not associated with any HABSI microorganism nor type of infection.
Note. CI, confidence interval; IRR, incidence rate ratio; CNS, coagulase-negative staphylococci.
a The mixed-effects negative binomial regression model adjusts for year, university-affiliated status and infection risk exposure expressed as monthly patient days. IRRs are expressed as a % change with 95% confidence intervals per increase in monthly average of ambient temperature by 5°C or 10% relative humidity. Only microorganisms with significant associations with climate variables year-round are reported.
b Regression analysis model included season, temperature, humidity and precipitation as fixed effects.
c Regression analysis model was performed with climate-by-season interaction terms as fixed effects.
d Group of other Enterobacterales includes E. proteus, E. serratia, E. morganella, and E. citrobacter.
* P≤ .05; ** P ≤ .01; and ***P ≤ .001.
Discussion
This national surveillance program identified seasonal variation in HABSI incidence rates. Summer incidence spikes occurred among Enterobacterales (E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and E. cloacae), nonfermenters (P. aeruginosa, Acinetobacter, and Stenotrophomonas spp), CLABSIs, and urinary tract HABSIs. Higher monthly ambient temperature was associated with increased gram-negative HABSI and CLABSI incidences. There was no association between HABSI and precipitation because precipitation has a confounding effect that influences temperature and humidity.
Previous reports have also identified summer increases in gram-negative infections and associations with ambient temperature. Reference Richet4,Reference Fisman, Patrozou and Carmeli11,Reference Eber, Shardell, Schweizer, Laxminarayan and Perencevich14,Reference Perencevich, McGregor and Shardell15 One tertiary-care center also identified CLABSI seasonal variation but was limited by the single-center design, short-term surveillance of 24 months, and lack of microorganism data. Reference Schreiber, Dunic and Wolfensberger16 There was no clear hospital-acquired S. aureus seasonality, which is in line with a previous literature review. Reference Leekha, Diekema and Perencevich5
The strengths of this study include nationwide long-term surveillance over multiple hospitals, detailed microorganism and infectious origin identification, and mixed-effects regression analysis with correction for confounding factors such as hospital heterogeneity, patient days, years, and seasons. Reference Christiansen, Pedersen, Sørensen and Rothman12 This is the first national study to analyze both seasonality of microorganism and infections per origin. Seasonality is a phenomenon that manifests due to interconnected changes in patient, pathogen, hospital, and environmental variables. For example, the number of available hospital beds decreases during the summer, which leads to lower patient admissions and possibly a selection bias of hospitalized patients with relatively higher comorbidities, which increases the risk of HABSI.
This study had several limitations. Insufficient information was available for confounding factors such as in-hospital temperature and humidity, patient comorbidities, nurse-to-patient ratio, and invasive device use (eg, central lines, endotracheal intubation, and urinary catheterization).
Notably, CLABSIs and urinary-tract HABSIs, infections associated with invasive device use, demonstrated seasonal variation. Although most CLABSIs are caused by gram-positive skin commensals, there was an association between higher ambient temperature and CLABSI rates. Catheter dressing disruption due to increasing skin perspiration or a changing nurse-to-patient ratio during the summer could be responsible. Reference Timsit, Bouadma and Ruckly17 A lower nurse-to-patient ratio has been shown to lead to worse patient outcomes such as mortality and HABSI. Reference Aiken, Sloane and Bruyneel18-Reference Needleman, Buerhaus, Mattke, Stewart and Zelevinsky20 However, studies that analyzed seasonal variation in nurse staffing have found both lower nursing hours per patient days and worse patient outcomes during the winter. Reference He, Staggs, Bergquist-Beringer and Dunton6,Reference He, Staggs, Bergquist-Beringer and Dunton21,Reference Staggs, Olds, Cramer and Shorr22 This nurse-to-patient ratio decrease is secondary to increased patient admissions during the influenza season. Another study in an acute-care hospital could not identify clear seasonal nurse-staffing patterns. Reference Griffiths, Maruotti and Recio Saucedo23 Belgian national hospital registry data on nurse staffing is available for the months of March, June, September, and December. 24 Unfortunately, these reports did not collect nurse staffing data during July–August, when a lower level may have been expected due to personnel vacation. In a similar vein, varying skill mix as inexperienced nurses and physician residents begin during the summer period could also have influenced the HABSI risk. Unfortunately, available data were insufficient to perform a subgroup analysis on urinary tract HABSIs associated with catheterization.
Nonetheless, the regression model identified associations between temperature, humidity, and gram-negative HABSI incidence after adjustment for different seasons. This model partially corrects for possible seasonal nurse-to-patient ratio variations. The association with temperature and gram-negative HABSI remained significant within the summer season, indicating a difference in gram-negative incidence between warmer and colder summers. Gram-negative incidence was also associated with higher relative humidity, which is actually lower during the summer period. Although the landmass of Belgium is relatively small (30,700 km2), the climate variables in the country’s center may not represent all geographic regions of the country. Climate factors were limited to ambient measurements, and although not all hospitals in Belgium are climate controlled, this method acts as a proxy for in-hospital climate. Heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning systems may maintain a relatively constant indoor temperature. However, not all hospitals use hospitalwide air-conditioning systems, and changes in ambient temperature and humidity may affect water reservoirs or moisture in the hospital environment. Reference McDonald, Banerjee and Jarvis25 Another explanation is that the changes in ambient temperature influence human activities and subsequently the risk of infection. Higher incidence of severe trauma during the summer may introduce certain pathogens into the hospital environment.
Gram-negative bacteria grow more readily in aquatic milieus and show optimal growth at warmer temperatures of 32–36°C. Reference Hostacká, Ciznár and Stefkovicová26-Reference Donlan28 Increases in gram-negative bacterial loads have been observed during the warm months in pond water and city water reservoirs. Reference Toscano, Bell and Zukerman29,Reference Al-Harbi30 Multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria have been described as waterborne pathogens causing healthcare-associated infections, commonly linked to contaminated sinks as a reservoir. Reference Kanamori, Weber and Rutala31 Biological studies have demonstrated that closer distance to the equator (ie, higher ambient temperature) is associated with higher proportions of anaerobic gram-negative bacteria and lower gram-positive bacteria in the human gut microbiome. Reference Suzuki and Worobey32 However, in this study, we did not focus on aerobic bacteria such as Enterobacterales. It has been suggested that the influx of patients or personnel into the hospital could carry microorganisms over onto the inanimate hospital environment and subsequently the hospitalized patient. Reference Maki, Alvarado, Hassemer and Zilz33 In this way the increased ambient environmental gram-negative load during the summer could influence the hospital environment, patient microbiome, and risk of infection. These considerations fall under the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention “One Health” concept, which recognizes that health is connected to the environment.
Seasonal variation among hospital-acquired infections has been clearly documented. The presence of CLABSI seasonality should be considered when interpreting infection prevention interventions. Future research should assess whether influenceable factors such as nurse-to-patient ratio, indoor climate, and device-utilization practices influence HABSI seasonality. In general, quality improvement and infection prevention interventions should be continuously applied. Depending on the underlying cause of seasonality, targeted preventive measures could be implemented during the summer, when HABSI risk is highest.
Financial support
S.B. holds a research mandate of the Specific Research Fund at Ghent University.
Conflicts of interest
All authors report no potential conflicts of interest related to this article.
Supplementary material
To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2021.85