Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:30:43.571Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Should Routine Throat Cultures Be Done in Hospital Personnel Complaining of a Sore Throat?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Chatrchai Watanakunakorn
Chatrchai Watanakunakorn*
Affiliation:
Infectious Disease Section, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Elizabeth Hospital Medical Center, Youngstown, Ohio and the NortheasternOhio University College of Medicine, Youngstown, Ohio
*
Infectious Disease Section, St. Elizabeth Hospital Medical Center, Youngstown, OH 44501
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a 750-bed community-teaching hospital with 3,200 employees, throat cultures were routinely done in hospital personnel complaining of a sore throat. During a 3-month period, 323 employees had throat cultures; only 20 (6.2%) of these throat cultures grew group A streptococcus. The prevalence of positive throat cultures was similarly low in employees (6.2%) and adult patients (7.3%). There was no evidence that employees either had higher prevalence of group A streptococcal pharyngitis or that they spread the infection to patients. It is concluded that routine throat cultures are not warranted in employees complaining of a sore throat, and that throat cultures should be done only selectively in hospital personnel with a high probability of group A streptococcal pharyngitis.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 6 , Issue 5 , May 1985 , pp. 183 - 185
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Williams, WW: Guideline for infection control in hospital personnel. Infect Control 1983;4(suppl):326–349.Google Scholar
2.Valenti, WM: Employee health guidelines from the American Occupational Medical Association. Infect Control 1984;5:303–306.Google Scholar
3.Facklam, RR: Streptococci and aerococci, in Lennette, EH, Balows, A, Hausler, WJ Jr, et al (eds): Manual of Clinical Microbiology, ed 3. Washington, DC, American Society for Microbiology, 1980, pp 88–110.Google Scholar
4.Taranta, A: The Chagrin factor vs. Iatromathematics: Impressions, notes, and reflections of an ex-streptococcologist, in Shulman, ST (ed): Pharyngitis: Management in an Era of Declining Rheumatic Fever. New York, Praeger, 1984, pp 279–292.Google Scholar
5.Sanford, JP: Management of pharyngitis in an era of declining incidence of rheumatic fever: An overview and synthesis, in Shulman, ST (ed): Pharyngitis: Management in an Era of Declining Rheumatic Fever. New York, Praeger, 1984, pp 251–254.Google Scholar
6.Shulman, ST: The decline of rheumatic fever. What impact on our management of pharyngitis? Am J Dis Child 1984;138:426–427.Google Scholar
7.Centers for Disease Control: National Nosocomial Infections Study Report, Annual Summary 1979. March 1982, p 11.Google Scholar
8.Richman, DD, Breton, SJ, Goldmann, DA: Scarlet fever and group A streptococcal surgical wound infection traced to an anal carrier. Pediatr 1977;90:387–390.Google Scholar
9.Stamm, WE, Feeley, JC, Facklam, RR: Wound infections due to group A streptococcus traced to a vaginal carrier. J Infect Dis 1978;138:287–292.Google Scholar
10.Berkelman, RL, Martin, D, Graham, DR, et al: Streptococcal wound infections caused by a vaginal carrier. JAMA 1982;247:2680–2682.Google Scholar
11.Quinn, RW, Hillman, W: An epidemic of streptococcal wound infections. Arch Environ Health 1965;11:28–33.Google Scholar
12.Kaplan, EL, Bisno, AL, Derrick, W, et al: AHA Committee report. Prevention of Rheumatic fever. Circulation 1977;55:1–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Garner, JS, Simmons, BP: CDC Guideline for isolation precautions in hospitals. Infect Control 1983;4(suppl):245–325.Google ScholarPubMed