Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:30:40.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Standardized Infection Ratios for Three General Surgery Procedures: A Comparison Between Spanish Hospitals and U.S. Centers Participating in the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

V. Monge Jodra ,
A. Robustillo Rodela ,
F. Martín Martínez ,
N. López Fresneña  and
Quality Control Indicator Working Group
V. Monge Jodra*
Affiliation:
Preventive Medicine Unit, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
A. Robustillo Rodela
Affiliation:
Preventive Medicine Unit, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
F. Martín Martínez
Affiliation:
Preventive Medicine Unit, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
N. López Fresneña
Affiliation:
Preventive Medicine Unit, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
*
Servicio de Medicina Preventiva, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, 28034 Madrid, Spain
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives:

To compare Spanish surgical wound infection (SWI) rates for three procedures with those published by the U.S. NNIS System, and to analyze quarterly trends.

Design:

This was a 4-year prospective analysis of SWI using data from a Spanish nosocomial infection surveillance network based on CDC classification criteria. SWI rates were computed as standardized infection ratios (SIRs). Trends for both SWIs and SIRs were evaluated by linear regression.

Setting:

Forty-three Spanish hospitals during 1997 through 2000.

Patients:

Those undergoing cholecystectomy (n = 7,631), appendectomy (n = 5,780), and herniorrhaphy (n = 9,864).

Results:

For cholecystectomy patients, the SWI rate was 4.38% and the SIR was 3.32. Both of these variables showed a slightly rising, although nonsignificant, linear trend during the study period. For appendectomy patients, the SWI rate was 7.94% and the SIR was 2.86. The linear trend was increasing for both, but only the SWI rate attained significance. For herniorrhaphy patients, the SWI rate was 1.77% and the SIR was 1.64. Both of these variables showed a significant descending tendency during the 4 years.

Conclusions:

Because the SIR takes into account the patient risk category, it is the best indicator of the trend shown by the SWI rate over time for a given surgical procedure. According to our comparison of SIRs with reference NNIS System values, SWI rates for cholecystectomy and appendectomy were high. Monitoring of the SIR will provide a basis for the design of infection control measures and the assessment of their effectiveness.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 24 , Issue 10 , October 2003 , pp. 744 - 748
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Huskins, WC, Soule, BM, O'Boyle, C, Gulácsi, L, O'Rourke, EJ, Goldmann, DA. Hospital infection prevention and control: a model for improving the quality of hospital care in low- and middle-income countries. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998;19:125–135.Google Scholar
2.Poulsen, KB, Bremmelgaard, A, Sorensen, AI, Raahave, D, Petersen, JV. Estimated costs of postoperative wound infections: a case-control study of marginal hospital and social security costs. Epidemiol Infect 1994;113:283–295.Google Scholar
3.Jarvis, WR. Selected aspects of the socioeconomic impact of nosocomial infections: morbidity, mortality, cost, and prevention. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996;17:552–557.Google Scholar
4.Vegas, AA, Jodrá, VM, Garcia, ML. Nosocomial infections in surgery wards: a controlled study of increased duration of hospital stays and direct cost of hospitalization. Eur J Epidemiol 1993;9:504–510.Google Scholar
5.Grupo de trabajo EPINE. Evolución de la prevalencia de las infecciones nosocomiales en los hospitales espanoles. Grupo de trabajo EPINE, Vaqué J, Roselló J, eds. Spain: 2001:121,186.Google Scholar
6.Haley, RW, Culver, DH, White, J, et al.The efficacy of infection and surveillance and control programs in preventing nosocomial infections in US hospitals. Am J Epidemiol 1985;121:182–205.Google Scholar
7.Roy, MC, Perl, TM. Basics of surgical-site infection surveillance. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1997;18:659–668.Google Scholar
8.Gaynes, RP, Solomon, S. Improving hospital-acquired infection rates: the CDC experience, Jt Comm J Qual Improv 1996;22:457–467.Google Scholar
9.National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System report: data summary from January 1992-April 2000, issued June 2000. Am J Infect Control 2000;28:429–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Culver, DH, Horan, TC, Gaynes, RP, et al.Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index: National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Am J Med 1991;91:152S–157S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Mangram, AJ, Horan, TC, Pearson, ML, Silver, LC, Jarvis, WR. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:250–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Horan, TC, Emori, TG. Definitions of key terms used in the NNIS System. Am J Infect Control 1997;25:112–116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Horan, TC, Gaynes, RP, Martone, WJ, Jarvis, WR, Emori, TG. CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992;13:606–608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Gustafson, TL. Practical risk-adjusted quality control charts for infection control. Am J Infect Control 2000;28:406–414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Benneyan, JC. Statistical quality control methods in infection control and hospital epidemiology: Part I. Introduction and basic theory. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998;19:194–214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Benneyan, JC. Statistical quality control methods in infection control and hospital epidemiology: Part II. Chart use, statistical properties, and research issues. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998;19:265–283.Google Scholar
17.Gulácsi, L, Kiss, ZT, Goldmann, DA, Huskins, WC. Risk-adjusted infection rates in surgery: a model for outcome measurement in hospitals developing quality improvement programmes. J Hosp Infect 2000;44:43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar