Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:32:07.966Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Surgical Site Infections After Laparoscopic and Open Cholecystectomies in Community Hospitals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Luke F. Chen ,
Deverick J. Anderson ,
Matthew G. Hartwig ,
Keith S. Kaye  and
Daniel J. Sexton
Luke F. Chen*
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke Infection Control Outreach Network, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
Deverick J. Anderson
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke Infection Control Outreach Network, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
Matthew G. Hartwig
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
Keith S. Kaye
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke Infection Control Outreach Network, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
Daniel J. Sexton
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke Infection Control Outreach Network, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
*
2100 Erwin Road, Durham, NC, 27710 (luke.chen@duke.edu)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters to the Editor
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , January 2008 , pp. 92 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2008

References

1.Legorreta, AP, Silber, JH, Costantino, GN, Kobylinski, RW, Zatz, SL. Increased cholecystectomy rate after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JAMA 1993;270:1429–1432.Google Scholar
2.Hendolin, HI, Paakonen, ME, Alhava, EM, Tarvainen, R, Kemppinen, T, Lahtinen, P. Laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy: a prospective randomised trial to compare postoperative pain, pulmonary function, and stress response. Eur J Surg 2000;166:394–399.Google Scholar
3.Zacks, SL, Sandler, RS, Rutledge, R, Brown, RS Jr.A population-based cohort study comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:334–340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Inoue, H, Itoh, K-i, Hori, H, et al.The cosmetic benefit of three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and umbilical trocar insertion. Dig Endose 1994;6:49–51.Google Scholar
5.Biscione, FM, Couto, RC, Pedrosa, TM, Neto, MC. Comparison of the risk of surgical site infection after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007;28:1103–1106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Livingston, EH, Rege, RV. A nationwide study of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 2004;188:205–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Richards, C, Edwards, J, Culver, D, Emori, TG, Toison, J, Gaynes, R. Does using a laparoscopic approach to cholecystectomy decrease the risk of surgical site infection? Ann Surg 2003;237:358–362.Google Scholar
8.National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004. Am J Infect Control 2004;32:470–485.Google Scholar
9.Chuang, SC, Lee, KT, Chang, WT, et al.Risk factors for wound infection after cholecystectomy. J Formos Med Assoc 2004;103:607–612.Google ScholarPubMed
10.Williams, LF Jr., Chapman, WC, Bonau, RA, McGee, EC Jr., Boyd, RW, Jacobs, JK. Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with open cholecystectomy in a single center. Am J Surg 1993;165:459–465.Google Scholar