Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:20:23.651Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tuberculosis Screening in the Long-term Care Setting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Loraine E. Price  and
William A. Rutala
Loraine E. Price*
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
William A. Rutala
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
*
Division of Infectious Diseases, UNC School of Medicine, 547 Clinical Sciences Bldg. 229H, Chapel Hill, NC 27514
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) skin-testing practices in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) in North Carolina (NC) were assessed from a 56% (148/263) response to a comprehensive TB screening questionnaire. TB skin tests were administered to employees on initial employment by 98% and annually by 97% of the LTCFs, generally (74%) by the Mantoux method. Employee skin tests were read at the appropriate time interval of 48 to 72 hours by 91%, but less than half used diameter of induration when interpreting reactive tests. The booster test was performed on new employees at eight (6%) of the LTCFs. TB skin tests were routinely performed on newly admitted residents by 56% or conditionally required by 18%, generally (73%) by the Mantoux method. Resident skin tests were read at the appropriate time interval of 48 to 72 hours by 92%, but again only half correctly interpreted reactive tests as significant. Residents received routine annual skin tests at 71% of the LTCFs, generally (80%) by the Mantoux method. Eight (6%) facilities routinely performed the booster test on newly admitted residents. TB infection prevalence in new employees during 1983 was 8.1% (47/578) in seven LTCFs and in newly admitted residents was 6.4% (7/110) in three LTCFs supplying this data. The five-year mean TB skin test conversion rate among employees was 1.1% (101/9545) in 12 LTCFs and among residents was 0.9% (46/5216) in nine LTCFs supplying this data. Lack of compliance to established TB skin-testing guidelines in NC LTCF was prevalent. In recognition of described endemic and epidemic spread of TB in LTCFs, residents and employees of LTCFs should be screened for TB utilizing established skin-testing practices.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 8 , Issue 9 , September 1987 , pp. 353 - 356
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Alpen, ME, Levison, ME, An epidemic of tuberculosis in a medical school. N Engl J Med 1965:272:718–721.Google Scholar
2.Barrett-Connor, E, The epidemiology of tuberculosis in physicians. JAMA 1979;241:33–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Levine, I, Tuberculosis risk in students of nursing. Arch Intern Med 1968;121:545–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Ehrenkranz, NJ, Kicklighter, JL, Tuberculosis outbreak in a general hospital: Evidence for airborne spread of infection. Ann Inlern Med 1972;77:377–382.Google Scholar
5.Cantanzaro, A, Nosocomial tuberculosis. Am Rev Respir Dis 1982;125:559–562.Google Scholar
6.Atuk, NO, Hunt, EH, Serial tuberculin testing and isoniazid therapy in general hospital employees. JAMA 1971;218:1795–1798.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Gregg, DB, Gibson, MS, Employee tuberculosis control in a predominantly tuberculosis hospital. J SC Med Assoc 1975;5:160–165.Google Scholar
8.Craven, RB, Wenzel, RP, Atuk, NO, Minimizing tuberculosis risk to hospital personnel and students exposed to unsuspected disease. Ann Intern Med 1975;82:628–632.Google Scholar
9.Ruben, FL, Norden, CW, Schuster, N, Analysis of a community hospital employee tuberculosis screening program 31 months after its inception. Am Rev Respir Dis 1977;115:23–28.Google Scholar
10.Vogeler, DM, Burke, JP, Tuberculosis screening for hospital employees: A five-year experience in a large community hospital. Am Rev Respir Dis 1978;117:227–232.Google Scholar
11.Bous, H, Duffy, KR, Hamory, BH, PPD conversion rales in an insurance company and a university hospital. Am J Infect Control 1984;12:247.Google Scholar
12.Holly, MP, Bartzokas, CA, Tuberculin testing in hospital personnel, J Hyg 1977;78:325–329.Google Scholar
13.Berman, J, Levin, ML, Orr, ST, et al: Tuberculosis risk for hospital employees: Analysis of a five-year tuberculin skin testing program. Am J Public Health 1981;71:1217–1222.Google Scholar
14.Lowenthal, G, Keys, T, Tuberculosis surveillance in hospital employees: Are we doing too much? Infect Control 1986;7:209–211.Google Scholar
15.Centers for Disease Control: Tuberculosis—North Dakota. MMWR 1979;27:523–525.Google Scholar
16.Centers for Disease Control: Tuberculosis in a nursing care facility—Washington. MMWR 1983;32:121-122, 128.Google Scholar
17.Centers for Disease Control: Tuberculosis in a nursing home—Oklahoma. MMWR 1980;29:465–467.Google Scholar
18.Stead, WW, Tuberculosis among elderly persons: An outbreak in a nursing home. Ann Intern Med 1981;94:606–610.Google Scholar
19.Stead, WW, Lofgren, JP, Warren, E, et al: Tuberculosis as an endemic and nosocomial infection among the elderly in nursing homes. N Engl J Med 1985;312:1483–1487.Google Scholar
20.Narain, JP, Lofgren, JP, Warren, E, et al: Epidemic tuberculosis in a nursing home: A retrospective cohort study. J Am Geriatr Soc 1985;33:258–263.Google Scholar
21.American Thoracic Society: Infectiousness of tuberculosis: A statement by the ad hoc committee on treatment of tuberculosis patients in hospitals. Am J Respir Dis 1967;96:836–837.Google Scholar
22.Guidelines for Prevention of Tuberculosis Traitsmission in Hospitals. Atlanta, US Public Health Service, 1975.Google Scholar
23.Williams, WW, CDC guidelines for infection control in hospital personnel. Infect Control 1983;4:326–349.Google Scholar
24.Price, LE, Rutala, WA, Samsa, GP, Tuberculosis in hospital personnel. Infect Control 1987;8:97–101.Google Scholar
25.Thompson, NJ, Glassroth, JL, Snider, DE, et al: The booster phenomenon in serial tuberculin testing. Am Rev Respir Dis 1979;119:587–597.Google Scholar
26.Tuberculosis Control Policies and Procedures. North Carolina Department of Human Resources, 1984.Google Scholar
27.Snider, DE, The tuberculin test, in Green, GM, Daniel, TM, Ball, WC (eds): Koch Centennial Memorial. New York, American Lung Association, 1982, pp 108–118.Google Scholar
28.Lunn, JH, Administering and reading the Mantoux test, in Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Tuberculosis Infection. New York, Audio Visual Medical Marketing Inc, 1984, pp 20–25.Google Scholar
29.Kearns, TS, Cole, CH, Farer, LS, et al: Public health issues in control of tuberculosis: Surveillance techniques and the role of health care providers. Chest 1985;87(suppl):135–138.Google ScholarPubMed
30.Welty, C, Burstin, S, Muspratt, S, et al: Epidemiology of tuberculosis infection in a chronic care population. Am Rev Respir Dis 1985;132:133–136.Google Scholar
31.Barry, MA, Regan, AM, Kunches, LM, et al: Two-stage tuberculin testing with control antigens in patients residing in two chronic disease hospitals. J Am Geriatr Soc 1987;35:147–153.Google Scholar
32.McGowan, JE, The booster effect—A problem for surveillance of tuberculosis in hospital employees. Infect Control 1980;1:147–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33.Bass, JB, Serio, RA, The use of repeat skin tests to eliminate the booster phenomenon in serial tuberculin testing. Am Rev Respir Dis 1981;123:394–396.Google Scholar
34.Valenti, WM, Andrews, BA, Presley, BA, et al: Absence of the booster phenomenon in serial tuberculin skin testing. Am Rev Respir Dis 1982;125:323–325.Google Scholar
35.Simon, JA, McVickers, SJ, Ferrell, CR, et al: Two-step tuberculin testing in a veterans domiciliary population. South Med J 1983;76:866–869.Google Scholar
36.Le, CT, Cost effectiveness of the two-step skin test for tuberculosis screening of employees in a community hospital. Infect Control 1984;5:570–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37.Snider, DE, Cauthen, GM, Tuberculin skin testing of hospital employees: Infection, “boosting,” and two-step testing. Am J Infect Control 1984;12:305–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38.Gross, TP, Israel, E, Powers, P, et al: Low prevalence of the booster phenomenon in nursing-home employees in Maryland. Md Med J 1986;35:107–109.Google Scholar