Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:16:02.312Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Urine Culture on Admission Impacts Antibiotic Use and Length of Stay: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2018

Molly J. Horstman*
Affiliation:
Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety (IQuESt); Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas VA Quality Scholars Coordinating Center, IQuESt, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas
Andrew M. Spiegelman
Affiliation:
The Advisory Board Company, Washington, DC
Aanand D. Naik
Affiliation:
Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety (IQuESt); Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas VA Quality Scholars Coordinating Center, IQuESt, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas
Barbara W. Trautner*
Affiliation:
Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety (IQuESt); Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
*
Address correspondence to Molly J. Horstman, MD, Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety (152), 2002 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, Texas 77030 (molly.horstman@bcm.edu) or Barbara Trautner, MD, PhD, Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety (152), 2002 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, Texas 77030 (trautner@bcm.edu).
Address correspondence to Molly J. Horstman, MD, Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety (152), 2002 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, Texas 77030 (molly.horstman@bcm.edu) or Barbara Trautner, MD, PhD, Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety (152), 2002 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, Texas 77030 (trautner@bcm.edu).

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the impact of urine culture testing on day 1 of admission on inpatient antibiotic use and hospital length of stay (LOS).

DESIGN

We performed a retrospective cohort study using a national dataset from 2009 to 2014.

SETTING

The study used data from 230 hospitals in the United States.

PARTICIPANTS

Admissions for adults 18 years and older were included in this study. Hospitalizations were matched with coarsened exact matching by facility, patient age, gender, Medicare severity-diagnosis related group (MS-DRG), and 3 measures of disease severity.

METHODS

A multilevel Poisson model and a multilevel linear regression model were used to determine the impact of an admission urine culture on inpatient antibiotic use and LOS.

RESULTS

Matching produced a cohort of 88,481 patients (n=41,070 with a culture on day 1, n=47,411 without a culture). A urine culture on admission led to an increase in days of inpatient antibiotic use (incidence rate ratio, 1.26; P<.001) and resulted in an additional 36,607 days of inpatient antibiotic treatment. Urine culture on admission resulted in a 2.1% increase in LOS (P=.004). The predicted difference in bed days of care between admissions with and without a urine culture resulted in 6,071 additional bed days of care. The impact of urine culture testing varied by admitting diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a urine culture sent on day 1 of hospital admission receive more days of antibiotics and have a longer hospital stay than patients who do not have a urine culture. Targeted interventions may reduce the potential harms associated with low-yield urine cultures on day 1.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:547–554

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
© 2018 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

PREVIOUS PRESENTATION. The findings in this manuscript were presented as a poster (#81) at the 2017 Society of Hospital Medicine Annual Meeting on May 2, 2017, in Las Vegas, Nevada. The abstract was a finalist in the poster competition.

References

REFERENCES

1. Colla, CH, Morden, NE, Sequist, TD, Schpero, WL, Rosenthal, MB. Choosing wisely: prevalence and correlates of low-value health care services in the United States. J Gen Intern Med 2015;30:221228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Rosenberg, A, Agiro, A, Gottlieb, M, et al. Early trends among seven recommendations from the Choosing Wisely Campaign. JAMA Intern Med 2015;175:19131920.Google Scholar
3. Clinician lists. Choosing Wisely website. http://www.choosingwisely.org/clinician-lists/. Published 2016. Accessed April 12, 2016.Google Scholar
4. Trautner, BW. Asymptomatic bacteriuria: when the treatment is worse than the disease. Nat Rev Urol 2012;9:8593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Rotjanapan, P, Dosa, D, Thomas, KS. Potentially inappropriate treatment of urinary tract infections in two Rhode Island nursing homes. Arch Intern Med 2011;171:438443.Google Scholar
6. Hartley, S, Valley, S, Kuhn, L, et al. Inappropriate testing for urinary tract infection in hospitalized patients: an opportunity for improvement. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34:12041207.Google Scholar
7. Leis, JA, Gold, WL, Daneman, N, Shojania, K, McGeer, A. Downstream impact of urine cultures ordered without indication at two acute care teaching hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34:11131114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Kiyatkin, D, Bessman, E, McKenzie, R. Impact of antibiotic choices made in the emergency department on appropriateness of antibiotic treatment of urinary tract infections in hospitalized patients. J Hosp Med 2016;11:181184.Google Scholar
9. Grein, JD, Kahn, KL, Eells, SJ, et al. Treatment for positive urine cultures in hospitalized adults: a survey of prevalence and risk factors in 3 medical centers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:319326.Google Scholar
10. Hartley, S, Valley, S, Kuhn, L, et al. Overtreatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria: identifying targets for improvement. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015;36:470473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. Report to the President on Combating Antibiotic Resistance. Executive Office of the President; 2014.Google Scholar
12. Core elements of hospital antibiotic stewardship programs. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. http://www.cdc.gov/getsmart/healthcare/implementation/core-elements.html. Published 2016. Accessed August 3, 2016.Google Scholar
13. Cai, T, Nesi, G, Mazzoli, S, et al. Asymptomatic bacteriuria treatment is associated with a higher prevalence of antibiotic resistant strains in women with urinary tract infections. Clin Infect Dis 2015;61:16551661.Google Scholar
14. Nicolle, LE, Bradley, S, Colgan, R, Rice, JC, Schaeffer, A, Hooton, TM. Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria in adults. Clin Infect Dis 2005;40:643654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Alahmadi, YM, Aldeyab, MA, McElnay, JC, et al. Clinical and economic impact of contaminated blood cultures within the hospital setting. J Hosp Infect 2011;77:233236.Google Scholar
16. MacVane, SH, Tuttle, LO, Nicolau, DP. Impact of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing organisms on clinical and economic outcomes in patients with urinary tract infection. J Hosp Med 2014;9:232238.Google Scholar
17. Claim inpatient admission type code. Research Data Assistance Center website. http://www.resdac.org/cms-data/variables/Claim-Inpatient-Admission-Type-Code. Published 2016. Accessed March 4, 2016.Google Scholar
18. Haider, AH, Gupta, S, Zogg, CK, et al. Beyond incidence: costs of complications in trauma and what it means for those who pay. Surgery 2015;158:96103.Google Scholar
19. Malas, MB, Canner, JK, Hicks, CW, et al. Trends in incident hemodialysis access and mortality. JAMA Surg 2015;150:441448.Google Scholar
20. Iacus, SM, King, G, Porro, G. Casual influence without balance checking: coarsened exact matching. Polit Anal 2012;20:124.Google Scholar
21. Elixhauser, A, Steiner, C, Harris, DR, Coffey, RM. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care 1998;36:827.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Christensen, KL, Holman, RC, Steiner, CA, Sejvar, JJ, Stoll, BJ, Schonberger, LB. Infectious disease hospitalizations in the United States. Clin Infect Dis 2009;49:10251035.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Freedberg, DE, Salmasian, H, Cohen, B, Abrams, JA, Larson, EL. Receipt of antibiotics in hospitalized patients and risk for Clostridium difficile infection in subsequent patients who occupy the same bed. JAMA Intern Med 2016;176:18011808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Hospital adjusted expenses per inpatient day. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation website. http://kff.org/other/state-indicator/expenses-per-inpatient-day/?currentTimeframe=0&sortModel=%7B%22colId%22:%22Location%22,%22sort%22:%22asc%22%7D. Published 2015. Accessed September 8, 2016.Google Scholar
25. Sousa, R, Munoz-Mahamud, E, Quayle, J, et al. Is asymptomatic bacteriuria a risk factor for prosthetic joint infection? Clin Infect Dis 2014;59:4147.Google Scholar
26. Drekonja, DM, Zarmbinski, B, Johnson, JR. Preoperative urine cultures at a veterans affairs medical center. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173:7172.Google Scholar
27. Bailin, S, Noiseux, N, Pottinger, JM, et al.. Screening patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty with perioperative urinalysis and the effect of a practice change on antimicrobial use. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:281286.Google Scholar
28. Juthani-Mehta, M. Asymptomatic bacteriuria and urinary tract infection in older adults. Clin Geriatr Med 2007;23:585594.Google Scholar
29. Horstman, MJ, Spiegelman, A, Naik, AD, Trautner, BW. National patterns of urine testing during inpatient admission. Clin Infect Dis 2017;65:11991205.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Horstman et al. supplementary material

eTables 1-3

Download Horstman et al. supplementary material(File)
File 157 KB