Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:26:17.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

WTO REGULATION OF TRANSNATIONAL PRIVATE AUTHORITY IN GLOBAL GOVERNANCE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 September 2018

Ming Du
Ming Du*
Affiliation:
Chair in Chinese and Comparative Law, University of Surrey, m.du@surrey.ac.uk.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Following the proliferation of private standards in the global supply chain trade, it has become clear that these can have adverse effects on international commerce and world welfare in the same way that government-imposed mandatory regulations do. However, the scope of the obligation of WTO Members in relation to the regulation of private standards remains vague and open to divergent interpretations under WTO law. This article starts from the premise that the debate should move beyond the search for a reasonable interpretation of relevant WTO disciplines and instead begin to consider normative questions concerning the legitimacy and accountability of transnational private regulation in global governance and the potential role of the WTO in regulating such private authority. The article explores what justifies the role of the WTO, a multilateral intergovernmental organization, in regulating transnational private standards and how a regulatory mechanism might be designed and implemented in practice.

Keywords

legitimacyprivate standardsSPS Agreementtransnational private authorityWTO
Type
Articles
Information
International & Comparative Law Quarterly , Volume 67 , Issue 4 , October 2018 , pp. 867 - 902
Copyright
Copyright © British Institute of International and Comparative Law 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I would like to thank the Editor-in-Chief Professor Sir Malcolm Evans, Anna Riddell, Professor Steven Wheatley and three anonymous reviewers for their insightful suggestions on earlier drafts of this paper.

References

1 Cutler, AC, Haufer, V and Porter, T (eds), Private Authority and International Affairs (SUNY Press 1999) 3–4Google Scholar.

2 Black, J, ‘Constructing and Contesting Legitimacy and Accountability in Polycentric Regulatory Regimes’ (2008) 2 Regulation and Governance 143CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wheatley, S, ‘A Democratic Rule of International Law’ (2012) 22(2) EJIL 527–30Google Scholar.

3 Scott, C, Cafaggi, F and Senden, L, ‘The Challenge of Transnational Private Regulation: Conceptual and Constitutional Debates (2011) 38(1) Journal of Law and Society 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Calliess, GP and Zumbansen, P, Rough Consensus and Running Code: A Theory of Transnational Private Law (Hart 2010)Google Scholar.

4 Some authors cautiously suggested extending administrative law approaches to private bodies without further elaboration. See Kingsbury, B, Krisch, N and Stewart, RB, ‘The Emergence of Global Administrative Law’ (2005) 68 LCP 23Google Scholar. Other authors explored different accountability mechanisms in world politics in general or legitimacy-enhancing techniques adopted by private actors, without addressing specifically the role of national governments and intergovernmental organizations such as the WTO in responding to the legitimacy deficit problem of transnational private actors. See Grant, R and Keohane, R, ‘Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics’ (2005) 99(1) AmPolScRev 29Google Scholar.

5 On the Role and Function of the SPS Committee, Lang, A and Scott, J, ‘The Hidden World of WTO Governance’ (2009) 20(3) EJIL 590Google Scholar.

6 WTO Document, G/SPS/W/247/Rev.3, para 1.

7 Note by the Secretariat, ‘Private Standards and the SPS Agreement’, G/SPS/GEN/746 (24 January 2007) paras 5–6.

8 Fulponi, L, ‘Private Voluntary Standards in the Food System: The Perspective of Major Food Retailers in OECD Countries’ (2006) 31(1) Food Policy 6–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 WTO Secretariat (n 7) para 3.

10 Submission by Switzerland, ‘Voluntary Standards’ (20 October 2009),G/SPS/GEN/967, para 3.

11 Communication from Canada on Eco-Labeling, G/TBT/W/9 (5 July 1995) 2; Zadalis, RJ, ‘When Do the Activities of Private Parties Trigger WTO Rules?’ (2007) 10(2) JIEL 337–8Google Scholar.

12 Submission by Switzerland (n 10) paras 7–8; Prévost, D, ‘Private Sector Food-Safety Standards and the SPS Agreement: Challenges and Possibilities’ (2008) 33 South African Yearbook of International Law 6Google Scholar.

13 World Trade Report 2012, Trade and Public Policies: A Close Look at Non-Tariff Measures in the 21st Century 167.

14 G Smith, ‘Interaction of Public and Private Standards in the Food Chain’ (2009) OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Working Paper No 15, 15.

15 Maertens, M and Swinnen, J, ‘Private Standards, Global Food Supply Chains and the Implications for Developing Countries’ in Marx, A, Maerrtens, M, Swinnen, J and Wouters, J (eds), Private Standards and Global Governance: Economic, Legal and Political Perspectives (Edward Elgar 2012) 153–4Google Scholar.

16 Wlostowski, T, ‘Selected Observations on the Regulation of Private Standards by the WTO’ (2010) 30 Polish Yearbook of International Law 229Google Scholar.

17 Communication from Nigeria, ‘Private Standards’ G/SPS/GEN/1398 (16 March 2015); Communication from Belize, ‘Belize's Comments on Private Standards’ G/SPS/W/288 (14 July 2015).

18 Note by the WTO Secretariat, ‘Summary of the SPS Committee Meeting of 22–23 March 2017’ G/SPS/R/86 (1 June 2017) 33.

19 SPS Committee, ‘Decision of the Committee: Actions Regarding SPS-Related Private Standards’ G/SPS/55 (6 April 2011).

20 SPS Committee, ‘Review of the Operation and Implementation of the SPS Committee: Draft Report of the Committee’ G/SPS/W/280/Rev.2 (6 November 2014) para 14.2.

21 Note by the Secretariat, ‘Proposed Working Definition of SPS-Related Private Standards’ G/SPS/W/265/Rev.2 (28 September 2012).

22 SPS Committee, ‘Second Report of the Co-Stewards of the Private Standards E-Working Group on Action 1 (G/SPS/55)’ G/SPS/W/281 (30 September 2014) para 15 (emphasis added).

23 SPS Committee, ‘Report of the Co-Stewards of the Private Standards E-Working Group to the March 2015 Meeting of the SPS Committee on Action 1 (G/SPS/55)’ G/SPS/W/283 (17 March 2015) para 22.

24 WTO, ‘WTO Members Adopt Report on Food Safety Agreement’ (14 July 2017) <https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news17_e/sps_13jul17_e.htm>.

25 PC Mavroidis and R Wolfe, ‘Private Standards and the WTO: Reclusive No More’ (2017) 16(1) WTR 13.

26 P Liu, ‘Private Standards in International Trade: Issues and Opportunities’ (WTO Workshop on Environment-related Private Standards, Certification and Labeling Requirements, Geneva, 9 July 2009) 16–17.

27 Note by the Secretariat, ‘Existing Definitions of Private Standards in Other International Organizations’ G/SPS/GEN/1334/Rev.1 (5 August 2014).

28 WTO Secretariat (n 21).

29 S Henson and J Humphrey, ‘The Impacts of Private Food Safety Standards on the Food Chain and on Public Standard-Setting Processes’ (2009) Paper Prepared for FAO/WHO 14.

30 J Nakagawa, ‘Private Standards and Global Governance: Prospects and Challenges’ (2017) ISS Research Series No 62, 8.

31 WTO Appellate Body Report, United States – Measures Concerning the Importation, Marketing and Sale of Tuna and Tuna Products (US – Tuna II) WT/DS381/AB/R (13 June 2012) para 359.

32 Pauwelyn, J, ‘Rule-Based Trade 2.0? The Rise of Informal Rules and International Standards and How They May Outperform WTO Treaties’ (2014) 17 JIEL 749CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Liu, HW, ‘International Standards in Flux: A Balkanized ICT Standard-Setting Paradigm and Its Implications for the WTO’ (2014) 17 JIEL 586CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33 ISO, ‘International Standards and ‘‘Private Standards’’’ (2010) <http://www.probus-sigma.com/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2014/02/International-standards-and-private-standards.pdf>.

34 WTO Panel report, US – Tuna II, WT/DS381/R (15 September 2011) para 7.655.

35 Du, M and Deng, F, ‘International Standards as Global Public Goods in the World Trading System’ (2016) 43(2) Legal Issues of Economic Integration 127–32Google Scholar.

36 Henson, S and Humphrey, J, ‘Understanding the Complexity of Private Standards in Global Agri-Food Chains as They Impact Developing Countries’ (2010) 46(9) The Journal of Development Studies 1641CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

37 Marx, A, ‘The Public-Private Distinction in Global Governance: How Relevant Is It in the Case of Voluntary Sustainability Standards?’ (2017) 3 The Chinese Journal of Global Governance 14CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

38 ISO (n 33) 2.

39 T Havinga and F Waarden, ‘Enforcing Compliance with Food Regulation: Modalities in the Relationship between Public Enforcement Agencies and Private Parties’ (ECPR General Conference, September 2013) 12.

40 Corvaglia, MA, ‘Public Procurement and Private Standards: Ensuring Sustainability under the WTO Agreement on Government Procurement’ (2016) 19 JIEL 608Google Scholar.

41 ECJ, Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber), European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands, Case C-368/10 (10 May 2012).

42 Vogel, D, ‘Private Global Business Regulation’ (2008) 11 Annual Review of Political Science 265CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

43 Henson and Humphrey (n 36) 1633.

44 Henson, S and Reardon, T, ‘Private Agri-Food Standards: Implications for Food Policy and the Agri-Food System’ (2005) 30 Food Policy 241CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

45 L Fulponi, ‘Final Report on Private Standards and the Shaping of the Agro-Food System’ (2006) OECD Doc AGR/CA/APM (2006)9/Final 10–11.

46 G Chia-Hui Lee, ‘Private Food Standards and Their Impacts on Developing Countries’ (2006) <http://www.trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2006/november/tradoc_127969.pdf> 8.

47 Henson, S, ‘The Role of Public and Private Standards in Regulating International Food Markets’ (2008) 4 Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development 67Google Scholar.

48 Fulponi (n 45) 9.

49 ibid 10.

50 S Washington and L Ababouch, ‘Private Standards and Certification in Fisheries and Aquaculture: Current Practice and Emerging Issues’ (2011) FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper 553, 19.

51 Scott, C, ‘Continuity and Change in British Food Law’ (1990) 56 MLR 792–4Google Scholar.

52 J Humphrey, ‘Food Safety, Private Standards Schemes and Trade: The Implications of the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act’ (2012) IDS Working Paper No 403, 39.

53 Washington and Ababouch (n 50) 18.

54 Note by the Secretariat, ‘Effects of SPS-Related Private Standards – Compilation of Replies’ G/SPS/GEN/932/Rev.1 (10 December 2009) 2.

55 Havinga, T, ‘Private Regulation of Food Safety by Supermarkets’ (2006) 28 (4) Law and Policy 522–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

56 Vandemoortele, T and Deconinck, K, ‘When Are Private Standards More Stringent Than Public Standards?’ (2014) 96(1) American Journal of Agricultural Economics 154–5Google Scholar.

57 Chia-Hui Lee (n 46) 27.

58 SPS Committee, ‘Actions Regarding SPS-Related Private Standards – Communication from Belize’ G/SPS/GEN/1374 (23 October 2014).

59 Schepers, DH, ‘Challenges to Legitimacy at the Forest Stewardship Council’ (2010) 92(2) Journal of Business Ethics 287CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

60 Liu (n 26) 16.

61 P Liu, ‘Certification in the Value Chain for Fresh Fruits: The Example of Banana Industry’ (2009) FAO Commodity Studies No 4, 71–85.

62 Fuchs, D, Kalfagianni, A and Havinga, T, ‘Actors in Private Food Governance: The Legitimacy of Retail Standards and Multistakeholder Initiatives with Civil Society Participation’ (2011) 28 Agriculture and Human Values 362CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

63 WTO Secretariat (n 54) paras 27–37.

64 Liu (n 26) 15.

65 GH Stanton, ‘Food Safety-related Private Standards: The WTO Perspective’ in Marx et al. (n 15) 242.

66 S Jaffe, ‘Food Safety and Agricultural Health Standards: Challenges and Opportunities for Developing Country Exports’ (2005) World Bank Report No 31207, XI–XII.

67 Henson, S and Jaffee, S, ‘Understanding Developing Country Strategic Responses to the Enhancement of Food Safety Standards’ (2008) 31(4) The World Economy 552CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

68 Stanton (n 65) 242.

69 WTO Secretariat (n 54) para 39.

70 International Trade Centre, ‘The Impact of Private Standards on Producers in Developing Countries: Literature Review Series on the Impacts of Private Standards – Part II’ (2011) 23–4.

71 Dolan, C and Humphrey, J, ‘Governance and Trade in Fresh Vegetables: The Impact of UK Supermarkets on the African Horticulture Industry’ (2000) 37(2) Journal of Development Studies 169CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

72 S Jaffee and S Henson, ‘Standards and Agri-Food Exports from Developing Countries: Rebalancing the Debate’ (2004) World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3348, 37–8.

73 S Jaffee, ‘From Challenges to Opportunities: Transforming Kenya's Fresh Vegetables Trade in the Context of Emerging Food Safety and Other Standards in Europe’ (2003) World Bank Agriculture and Rural Development Discussion Paper No 2, 59.

74 Maertens and Swinnen (n 15) 153–69.

75 Van der Grijp, N, Marsden, T and Cavalcanti, J, ‘European Retailers as Agents of Change towards Sustainability: The Case of Fruit Protection in Brazil’ (2005) 2(4) Environmental Sciences 445CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

76 Lin, CF, ‘Public-Private Interaction in Global Food Safety Governance’ (2014) 69(2) Food and Drug Law Journal 159Google ScholarPubMed.

77 WTO Panel Report, Japan – Measures Affecting Consumer Photographic Film and Paper, WT/DS44/R (22 April 1998) para 10.52; WTO Appellate Body Report, United States – Sunset Review of Anti-Dumping Duties on Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products from Japan, WT/DS244/AB/R (9 January 2004) para 81.

78 WTO Panel Report, Japan – Film (n 77) para 10.56 (emphasis added).

79 Villalpando, SM, ‘Attribution of Conduct to the State: How the Rules of State Responsibility May Be Applied within the WTO Dispute Settlement System’ (2002) 5(2) JIEL 408CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

80 WTO Secretariat (n 7) para 17.

81 GATT Panel Report, Japan – Trade in Semiconductors, GATT Doc L/6309, 35th Supp BISD 116 (4 May 1988) para 109.

82 GATT Panel Report, Japan – Restrictions on Imports of Certain Agricultural Products, GATT Doc L/6253, 35th Supp BISD 163 (18 November 1987) para 5.4.1.4.

83 Zadalis (n 11) 341.

84 GATT Panel Report, Japan – Agricultural Restrictions (n 82) para 5.4.1.1.

85 WTO Panel Report, Japan – Film (n 77) paras 10.176–10.180.

86 ibid, paras 10.190–10.194.

87 Zadalis (n 11) 346.

88 WTO Panel Report, European Communities – Measures Affecting the Approval and Marketing of Biotech Products (EC – Biotech), WT/DS291/R (21 November 2006) para 7.149.

89 Note by the Secretariat, ‘Summary of the SPS Committee Meeting of 30 June–1 July 2016’ G/SPS/R/83 (9 August 2016, para 13.7.

90 WTO Secretariat (n 7) para 15.

91 Arcuri, A, ‘The TBT Agreement and Private Standards’ in Epps, T and Trebilcock, MJ (eds), Research Handbook on the WTO and Technical Barriers to Trade (Edward Elgar 2013) 516Google Scholar.

92 GATT Analytical Index <https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/gatt_ai_e/art3_e.pdf> 173–4.

93 Submission by the United Kingdom, ‘Private Voluntary Standards within the WTO Multilateral Framework’ (9 October 2007) G/SPS/GEN/802, at 21.

94 ibid 91.

95 Rigod, B, ‘The Purpose of the WTO Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)’ (2013) 24(2) EJIL 529–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

96 Submission by the United Kingdom (n 93) 54.

97 WTO Panel Report, Australia – Measures Affecting Importation of Salmon – Recourse to Article 21.5 of the DSU by Canada, WT/DS18/RW (20 March 2000) para 7.13.

98 Chia-Hui Lee (n 46) 34–5; Henson (n 47) 76.

99 Pauwelyn, J, ‘Non-Traditional Patterns of Global Regulation: Is the WTO Missing the Boat?’ in Joerges, C and Petersmann, EU (eds), Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade Governance and Social Regulation (Hart 2006) 210Google Scholar.

100 Submission by the United Kingdom (n 93) 78.

101 Bernstein, S and Hannah, E, ‘Non-State Global Standard Setting and the WTO: Legitimacy and the Need for Regulatory Space’ (2008) 11 JIEL 578CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Prévost (n 12) 19–20.

102 Arcuri (n 91) 518.

103 Casey, D, ‘Private Food Safety and Quality Standards and the WTO’ (2007) 7 University College Dublin Law Review 81–2Google Scholar; Gandhi, SR, ‘Regulating the Use of Voluntary Environmental Standards within the World Trade Organization's Legal Regime: Making a Case for Developing Countries’ (2005) 39 JWT 867–8Google Scholar.

104 WTO Panel Report (n 97) para 7.13.

105 Wouters, J and Geraets, D, ‘Private Food Standards and the World Trade Organization: Some Legal Considerations’ (2012) 11(3) WTR 486CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

106 Submission by the United Kingdom (n 93) 33.

107 GATT Panel Report, Canada – Measures Affecting the Sale of Gold Coins, L/5863 (17 September 1985, unadopted) paras 68–9.

108 GATT Panel Report, Canada – Import Distribution and Sale of Alcoholic Drinks by Canadian Provincial Marketing Agencies, DS17/R (18 February 1992) para 5. 37 (emphasis added).

109 Prévost (n 12) 23.

110 Submission by the United Kingdom (n 93) 57.

111 Article 1.5 of the TBT Agreement.

112 Delimatsis, P, ‘Relevant International Standards and Recognized Standardization Bodies under the TBT Agreement’ in Delimatsis, P (ed), The Law, Economics and Politics of International Standardization (Cambridge University Press 2015) 127CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

113 ibid 128.

114 WTO Appellate Body Report (n 31) para 363.

115 CIEL and ISEAL, ‘International Standards and Technical Barriers to Trade’ (July 2006) <https://www.isealalliance.org/sites/default/files/R053_ISEAL_CIEL_Legal_Opinion.pdf>

116 WTO Appellate Body Report (n 31) para 361.

117 ibid, para 362.

118 ibid, para 392.

119 WTO Secretariat, ‘Negotiating History of the Coverage of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade with regard to Labeling Requirements, Voluntary Standards, and Processes and Production Methods Unrelated to Product Characteristics’ WT/CTE/W/10 (29 August 1995) 11–13.

120 Bartenhagen, EP, ‘The Intersection of Trade and the Environment: An Examination of the Impact of the Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement on Ecolabeling Programs’ (1997) 17(1) VaEnvtlLJ 72Google Scholar.

121 Bernstein and Hannah (n 101) 604–5.

122 Mavroidis and Wolfe (n 25) 2.

123 Pauwelyn (n 99) 219.

124 Ponti, S, ‘Greener Than Thou: The Political Economy of Fish Ecolabeling and Its Local Manifestations in South Africa’ (2007) 36(1) World Development 159CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Fuchs, D, Agni, K and Maarten, A, ‘Retail Power, Private Standards and Sustainability in the Global Food System’ in Clapp, J and Fuchs, D (eds), Corporate Power in Global Agrifood Governance (MIT Press 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

125 Note by the Secretariat, ‘Summary of the SPS Committee Meeting Held on 29–30 June 2005’ G/SPS/R/37/Rev.1 (18 August 2005) para 20.

126 Submission by the OIE, ‘Considerations Relevant to Private Standards in the Field of Animal Health, Food Safety and Animal Welfare’ G/SPS/GEN/822 (25 February 2008) 1.

127 Weber, M, Gerth, HH and Mills, CW (eds), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (Routledge 2007) 213Google Scholar.

128 Black (n 2) 144.

129 Curtin, D and Senden, L, ‘Public Accountability of Transnational Private Regulation: Chimera or Reality?’ (2011) 38(1) Journal of Law and Society 169CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

130 Thomas, CA, ‘The Uses and Abuses of Legitimacy in International Law’ (2014) 34(4) OJLS 733CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

131 Bodansky, DM, ‘The Legitimacy of International Governance: A Coming Challenge for International Environmental Law’ (1999) 93 AJIL 599CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hachez, N and Wouters, J, ‘A Glimpse at the Democratic Legitimacy of Private Standards: Assessing the Public Accountability of GLOBALG.A.P.’ (2011) 14(3) JIEL 683CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

132 Risse, T, ‘Transnational Governance and Legitimacy’ in Benz, A and Papadopoulos, Y (eds), Governance and Democracy: Comparing National, European and International Experiences (Routledge 2006) 183–5Google Scholar.

133 Bernstein, S and Cashore, B, ‘Can Non-State Global Governance Be Legitimate? An Analytical Framework’ (2007) 1(4) Regulation and Governance 351CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

134 Nanz, P and Steffek, J, ‘Global Governance, Participation and the Public Sphere’ (2004) 39 Government and Opposition 314CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

135 Grant and Keohane (n 4) 29–30.

136 Hachez and Wouters (n 131) 693.

137 Koenig-Archibugi, M, ‘How to Diagnose Democratic Deficits in Global Politics: The Use of the “All Affected Principle”’ (2017) 9(2) International Theory 172CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

138 Macdonald, T and Macdonald, K, ‘Non-Electoral Accountability in Global Politics: Strengthening Democratic Control within the Global Garment Industry’ (2006) 17 EJIL 91CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

139 de Burca, G, ‘Developing Democracy beyond the State’ (2008) 46 ColumJTransnatlL 221Google Scholar; Wheatley, S, ‘Democratic Governance beyond the State: The Legitimacy of Non-State Actors as Standard Setters’ in Peters, A et al. (eds), Non-State Actors as Standard Setters (Cambridge University Press 2009) 226–7Google Scholar.

140 Hachez and Wouters (n 131) 690.

141 Mulgan, R, ‘Accountability: An Ever Expanding Concept?’ (2000) 78(3) PubAdmin 556Google Scholar.

142 Bovens, M, ‘Analyzing and Assessing Public Accountability: A Conceptual Framework’ (2007) 13(4) ELJ 450Google Scholar.

143 Fuchs et al. (n 62) 359–65.

144 Hachez and Wouters (n 131) 702–4.

145 Fuchs et al. (n 62) 361.

146 Hachez and Wouters (n 131) 709.

147 Uhlin, A, ‘Democratic Legitimacy of Transnational Actors: Mapping out the Conception Terrain’ in Erman, E and Uhlin, A (eds), Legitimacy beyond the State? Re-examining the Democratic Credentials of Transnational Actors (Palgrave Macmillan 2010) 17Google Scholar.

148 Fuchs et al. (n 62) 359.

149 Walter, M and Woods, N, ‘In Whose Benefit? Explaining Regulatory Change in Global Politics’ in Mattli, W and Woods, N (eds), The Politics of Global Regulation (Princeton University Press 2009) 13–15Google Scholar.

150 Halabi, SF and Lin, C-F, ‘Assessing the Relative Influence and Efficacy of Public and Private Food Safety Regulation Regimes: Comparing Codex and GlobalG.A.P. Standards’ (2017) 72 Food and Drug Law Journal 27–9Google ScholarPubMed.

151 W Bruce Traill et al., ‘Report of the Evaluation of the Codex Alimentarius and Other FAO and WHO Food Standards Work’ (FAO 2002) para 24.

152 Livermore, MA, ‘Authority and Legitimacy in Global Governance: Deliberation, Institutional Differentiation and the Codex Alimentarius’ (2006) 81 NYULRev 783–6Google Scholar.

153 Du and Deng (n 35) 115.

154 Henson and Humphrey (n 29) 40; Loconto, A and Fouilleux, E, ‘Politics of Private Regulation: ISEAL and the Shaping of Transnational Sustainability Governance’ (2014) 8 Regulation & Governance 168–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

155 ibid 40.

156 ITC (n 70) 23–4.

157 Naiki, Y, ‘The Dynamics of Private Food Safety Standards: A Case Study on the Regulatory Diffusion of GLOBALG.A.P.’ (2014) 63 ICLQ 146CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

158 Henson and Humphrey (n 29) 2–13.

159 Scott, C, Cafaggi, F and Senden, L, ‘The Conceptual and Constitutional Challenge of Transnational Private Regulation’ (2011) 38(1) Journal of Law and Society 8CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

160 Scott, J, The WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures: A Commentary (Oxford University Press 2007) 310Google Scholar.

161 Meidinger, E, ‘Competitive Supragovermental Regulation: How Could It Be More Democratic’ (2008) 8 ChicagoJIL 518Google Scholar.

162 Kingsbury et al. (n 4) 23.

163 Bogdandy, AV, Dann, P and Goldmann, M, ‘Developing the Publicness of Public International Law: Toward a Legal Framework for Global Governance Activities’ (2008) 9 German Law Journal 1384Google Scholar.

164 Kingsbury et al. (n 4) 37–42.

165 Stewart, RB and Badin, MR Sanchez, ‘The World Trade Organization: Multiple Dimensions of Global Administrative Law’ (2011) 9 ICON 569–71Google Scholar.

166 Black (n 2) 149.

167 Bomhoff, J and Meuwese, A, ‘The Mega-regulation of Transnational Private Regulation’ (2011) 38(1) Journal of Law and Society 139CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

168 Bernstein and Hannah (n 101) 588.

169 ISEAL Alliance, Setting Social and Environmental Standards: ISEAL Code of Good Practice (Version 6.0, 2014) 5–6.

170 ISO (n 33) 5.

171 Bomhoff and Meuwese (n 167) 159.

172 Note by the Secretariat, ‘Possible Actions for the SPS Committee Regarding Private Standards’ G/SPS/W/247/Rev.3 (11 October 2010).

173 SPS Committee, ‘Decision of the Committee – Actions Regarding SPS-Related Private Standards’ G/SPS/55 (6 April 2011).

174 SPS Committee, ‘Actions Regarding SPS-Related Private Standards – Communication from Belize’ G/SPS/GEN/1291 (16 October 2013).

175 WTO SPS Committee, ‘Third Review of the WTO SPS Agreement, Proposal by India’ G/SPS/W/236 (17 April 2009).

176 Bomhoff and Meuwese (n 167) 141.

177 OIE Submission (n 126) para 15.

178 WTO Secretariat (n 89) para 13.1.

179 ibid, paras 13.4–13.6.

180 Mavroidis and Wolfe (n 25) 17–19.

181 B Guermazi, ‘Exploring the Reference Paper on Regulatory Principles’ (2000) <https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/...e/.../guermazi_referencepaper.doc>.

182 Hoekman, B and Mavroidis, PC, ‘Embracing Diversity: Plural Agreements and the Trading System’ (2015) 14(1) WTR 101CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

183 Submission by the United Kingdom (n 93) 94.

184 Scott (n 160) 302.