Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-9f2xs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-05T13:21:48.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dissipation and Ellipticity of the Chandler Wobble

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Yaozhong Zhu  and
Buxi Gao
Yaozhong Zhu
Affiliation:
Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 54 Xudong Road, Wuhan, Hubei, 430077, China
Buxi Gao
Affiliation:
Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 54 Xudong Road, Wuhan, Hubei, 430077, China

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Chandler wobble, one of the main feature of the Earth’s polar motion, is related to the properties of the mantle and liquid core as well as the mobility of the oceans. The equilibrium pole tide and mantle anelasticity both lengthen the Chandler period, moreover, the former imposes a slight ellipticity on the pole path, and the latter is responsible for the wobble energy dissipation. On the basis of the perturbation principles, we derive the theoretical Qω of the Chandler wobble, assuming that the wobble energy is totally dissipated within the mantle. The theoretical ellipticity and orientation of the semimajor axis of the Chandler wobble path for an anelastic Earth are given. Compared with the results for the elastic Earth, the effect of mantle anelasticity does not change the wobble ellipticity significantly, but slightly changes the orientation of the semimajor axis in the opposite direction. This paper has also proved that the effect of the Earth’s 3-axis feature on the wobble ellipticity is only about 19% of that of the equilibrium pole tide. Analysis of the polar motion data obtained by using modern geodetic techniques shows that the observed ellipticity and orientation of the semimajor axis agree with the theoretical results. We can deduce that the pole tide in the globe should be close to equilibrium.

Type
Part 5. Chandler and Annual Polar Motion: Observations and Excitation
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 178: Polar Motion: Historical and Scientific Problems , 2000 , pp. 473 - 480
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2000

References

Balmino, G., Lambeck, K., and Kaula, W. M., 1973, A spherical harmonic analysis of the Earth’s topography, J. Geophys. Res., 78, 478–481.Google Scholar
Carton, J.A. and Wahr, J. M., 1986, Modelling the pole tide and its effect on the Earth’s rotation, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 84, 121–137.Google Scholar
Dziewonski, A. and Anderson, D. L., 1981, Preliminary reference Earth model, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 25, 297–356.Google Scholar
Furuya, M. and Chao, B. F., 1996, Estimation of period and Q of the Chandler wobble, Geophys. J. Int., 127, 693–702.Google Scholar
Gao, B., 1994, Is the Chandler wobble stable, Science in China (B), 37, 84–93.Google Scholar
Gross, R.S., 1993, A combination of Earth orientation data: SPACE92, in Earth Orientation, Reference Frames and Atmospheric Excitation Functions Submitted for the 1992 IERS Annual Report, IERS Tech. Note 14, edited by Chariot, P., pp. C1-C8, Obs. de Paris, Paris.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, H., 1968, The variation of latitude, Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc., 141, 255–268.Google Scholar
Kuehne, J., Wilson, C. R., and Johnson, S., 1996, Estimates of the Chandler wobble frequency and Q, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 13573–13579.Google Scholar
Lerch, F.J. et al., 1994, A geopotential model for the Earth from satellite tracking, altimeter, and surface gravity observations: GEM-T3, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 2815–2839.Google Scholar
Munk, W.H. and MacDonald, G. J. F., 1960 The Rotation of the Earth, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ooc, M., 1978, An optimal complex AR.MA model for the Chandler wobble, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 53, 445–457.Google Scholar
Smith, M.L. and Dahlen, F. A., 1981, The period and Q of the Chandler wobble, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 64, 223–282.Google Scholar
Wilson, C.R. and Haubrich, R. A., 1976, Meteorological excitation of the Earth’s wobble, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 46, 707–743.Google Scholar
Zschau, J. and Wang, R., 1985, Imperfect elasticity in the Earth’s mantle, Implications for the Earth tides and long period deformations, in Proceedings of 10th International Symposium on “Earth’s Tides,” Madrid, Spain, 1985, pp. 379–382, Cons. Super. De Invest. Cient., Madrid.Google Scholar