Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T14:08:05.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

BRAHMO SAMAJ AS AN ACTOR IN THE DISSEMINATION OF ARYAN INVASION THEORY (AIT) IN INDIA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 January 2016

Subrata Chattopadhyay Banerjee
Subrata Chattopadhyay Banerjee*
Affiliation:
RWTH Aachen University E-mailsubrata10.chattopadhyay@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Dissemination of a scientific theory often follows a circuitous route. It is a widespread notion supported by eminent scholars that the noted linguist and religious scholar F. Max Müller is responsible for the dissemination of the Aryan Invasion Theory (AIT), and thus played into the hands of imperial interests. In this article, we argue that there were other stakeholders in the process of the widespread acceptance of AIT. In particular, Brahmo Samaj, a prominent socio-religious reform association in nineteenth-century India, also played a major role in the spreading of AIT. Prominent leaders of Brahmo Samaj, actively or passively, collaborated with Müller in that process. We closely examine the development of affairs during that time and attempt to establish that the development of a scientific theory is not a unilateral process, but rather strongly influenced by the socio-political environments of the time.

Keywords

Aryan Invasion TheoryFriedrich Max MüllerBrahmo SamajcolonialismChristianityHinduismcaste systemKeshub Chandra Sen
Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , January 2016 , pp. 19 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arnold 2000 Arnold, David. (2000). Science, Technology and Medicine in Colonial India. The New Cambridge History of India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Arooran 1980a Arooran, K. N.Tamil Renaissance and Dravidian Nationalism, 1905–1944. Madurai: Koodal Publishers, 1980.Google Scholar
Arooran 1980b Arooran, K. N.Caste & the Tamil Nation: The Origin of the Non-Brahmin Movement, 1905–1944. Madurai: Koodal Publishers, 1980.Google Scholar
Bagal 1968 Bagal, J. C.Hindu Melar Itibritta. Maitri Publication, 1968. OCLC Number: 417390882.Google Scholar
Bahuguna n.d. Bahuguna, Tanvi. “Against Brahmanical Domination. Emergence of Anti-Brahmanic Movement in the South,” MA Paper, Jamia Millia Islamia, n.d.Google Scholar
Basu 1866 Basu, Rajnarayan. The Prospectus of a Society for the Promotion National Feeling among the Educated Natives of Bengal (1866), http://www.midnapore.in/people/rishi_rajnarayan_basu_prospectus_of_society.htmlGoogle Scholar
Beckerlegge 1997 Beckerlegge, G. “Professor Friedrich Max Müller and the Missionary Cause.” In Religion in Victorian Britain, vol. 5, Culture and Empire, ed. Wolffe, J., pp. 177–220. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Borthwick 1977 Borthwick, Meredith. Keshub Chunder Sen: A Search for Cultural Synthesis. Calcutta: Minerva, 1977.Google Scholar
Bose 1884 Bose, Ram Chandra. Brahmoism; or, History of Reformed Hinduism from Its Origin in 1830, under Rajah Ram Mohun Roy, to the Present Time. New York: Funk & Wagnalls, 1884.Google Scholar
Carpenter 1866 Carpenter, Mary, ed. The Last Days in England of Rajah Rammohun Roy. London: Trübner & co.; Calcutta: Lepage, 1866.Google Scholar
The Church Missionary GleanerThe Church Missionary Gleaner. London: Church Missionary Society.Google Scholar
Cohn 1983 Cohn, B. S. “Representing Authority in British India.” In The Invention of Tradition, eds. Hobsbawm, E. and Rander, T.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Collet 1877 Collet, Sophia Dobson. Letter from Keshab to Sophia Dobson Collet, 10 December 1875. Reprinted in Collet, S. D., ed., The Brahmo Year Book for 1877. London: Williams and Norgate, 1877.Google Scholar
Collet 1871 Collet, Sophia Dobson, ed. Keshub Chunder Sen's English Visit. London: Strahan and Co., 1871.Google Scholar
Cunningham 1981 Cunningham, Hugh. “The Language of Patriotism 1750–1914.” History Workshop Journal 12:1 (1981), pp. 8–33.Google Scholar
Daily NewsDaily News.Google Scholar
Datta 2010 Datta, M. N.Sri Sri Ramkrishner Anudhyan. Kolkata: The Mahendra Publishing Committee, 2010.Google Scholar
Deshpande 2015 Deshpande, Sharad, ed. Philosophy in Colonia India. New York: Springer, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farquhar 1915 Farquhar, J. N. (1915). Modern Religious Movements of India. New York: Macmillan, 1915.Google Scholar
Girardot 2002a Girardot, N. J. “Max Müller's ‘Sacred Books’ and the Nineteenth-Century Production of the Comparative Science of Religions.” History of Religions 41:3 (2002), pp. 213–50.Google Scholar
Girardot 2002b Girardot, N. J.The Victorian Translation of China: James Legge's Oriental Pilgrimage. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Glasgow HeraldGlasgow Herald, Glasgow.Google Scholar
Hall 2002 Hall, Catherine. Civilising Subjects: Metropole and Colony in the English Imagination 1830–1867. Oxford: Polity, 2002.Google Scholar
Healy 1982 Healy, F. “The ruination of Indian economy, the possibility of research funding organization as a focus for science studies.” Science Studies Conference, Oxford, 1982.Google Scholar
Heathorn 2000 Heathorn, Stephen. For Home, Country, and Race: Constructing Gender, Class and Englishness in the Elementary School, 1880–1914. Toronto: Toronto University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Hirschmann 2008 Hirschmann, Edwin. Robert Knight: Reforming Editor in Victorian India. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Hirschmann 2004 Hirschmann, Edwin. “The Hidden Roots of a Great Newspaper: Calcutta's Statesman.” Victorian Periodicals Review 37.2 (2004), pp. 141–60.Google Scholar
Hudson 1996 Hudson, Nicholas. “From ‘Nation’ to ‘Race’: The Origin of Racial Classification in Eighteenth-Century Thought.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 29:3 (1996), pp. 247–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houghton 1985 Houghton, W. E.The Victorian Frame of Mind: 1830–1870. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Illustrated Missionary NewsIllustrated Missionary News, London.Google Scholar
The InquirerThe Inquirer. London.Google Scholar
John Lawrence Collection John Lawrence Collection. India Office Library, MSS.Eur.F.90/31, Letters to Secretary of State, vol.3. No. 58 to Lord Cranborne, Calcutta, 19 December 1866.Google Scholar
Kennedy 2002 Kennedy, D.Britain and Empire, 1880–1945. London: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar
Koditschek 2011 Koditschek, T.Liberalism, Imperialism, and the Historical Imagination: Nineteenth-Century Visions of a Greater Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Kopf 1979 Kopf, David. The Brahmo Samaj and the Shaping of the Modern India. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Kopf 1975 Kopf, D. “The Universal Man and the Yellow Dog: The Orientalist Legacy and the Problem of Brahmo Identity in the Bengal Renaissance.” In Aspects of Bengali History and Society, ed. Baumer, R. Van M., pp. 43–81. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Kopf 1969 Kopf, D.British Orientalism and the Bengal Renaissance: The Dynamics of Indian Modernization. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Livingstone 1865 Livingstone, David and Livingstone, Charles. Narrative of an Expedition to the Zambezi and Its Tributaries 1858–1864. London: John Murray, 1865.Google Scholar
Macpherson 1900 Macpherson, G.Life of Lal Behari Day. Edinburgh, T. & Clarke, T., 1900.Google Scholar
McClelland 2006 McClelland, Keith. “Citizenship and Empire, 1867–1928.” In At Home with the Empire: Metropolitan Culture and the Imperial World, eds. Hall, Catherine and Rose, Sonya. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Mehrota 1971 Mehrota, S.The Emergence of the Indian National Congress. Delhi: Vikas Publications, 1971.Google Scholar
Metcalf 1964 Metcalf, T. R.The Aftermath of Revolt: India, 1857–1870. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Milic 1980 Milic, M. J. “The Sociology of Science in East and West.” Current Sociology 28 (1980), pp. 1–342.Google Scholar
Missionary HeraldMissionary Herald. Journal published by the Baptist Missionary Society.Google Scholar
The Monthly RecordThe Monthly Record. The Free Church of Scotland.Google Scholar
Mookerjee 1970 Mookerjee, Nanda. I Point to India; Selected Writings of Max Mueller. Bombay: Shakuntala Pub. House, 1970.Google Scholar
Mozoomdar 1887 Mozoomdar, Protap Chunder. Life and Teachings of Keshub Chandra Sen. Calcutta: Baptist Mission Press, 1887. 3rd edition. Calcutta: Nababidhan Trust, 1931.Google Scholar
Müller 1898 Müller, F. Max. Auld Lang Syne. New York: Scribners, 1898.Google Scholar
Müller 1891 Müller, F. Max, “Physical Religion,” Gifford Lecture, Glasgow, 1891.Google Scholar
Müller 1884 Müller, F. Max. Biographical Essays. London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1884; rpt. London: Forgotten Books, 2013.Google Scholar
Müller 1881 Müller, F. Max. Selected Essays on Language, Mythology, and Religion. London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1881.Google Scholar
Müller 1874 Müller, F. Max. On Missions. New York: Scribner, Armstrong and Company, 1874.Google Scholar
Müller 1859 Müller, F. Max. A History of Ancient Sanskrit Literature. London: Williams & Norgate; Paris: B. Duprat. Leipzig: R. Hartmann, 1859.Google Scholar
Müller and Müller 1902 Müller, F. Max and Müller (Grenfell), Georgina Adelaide. The life and letters of the Right Honourable Friedrich Max Müller. 2 vols. London, New York: Longmans, Green, 1902.Google Scholar
O'Leary 2000 O'Leary, D.“Raciological Thought in Victorian Culture: A Study in Imperial Dissemination.” Doctoral thesis, University of British Columbia, 2000.Google Scholar
Oman 1906 Oman, John C.Brahmans, Theists and Muslims of India. London: Fisher Unwin, 1906.Google Scholar
Panikkar 1961 Panikkar, K. M.Asia and Western Dominance. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1961.Google Scholar
Patil 2003 Patil, N. B.The Variegated Plumage: Encounters with Indian Philosophy: a Commemoration Volume in Honour of Pandit Jankinath Kaul “Kamal”. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 2003.Google Scholar
The Record SupplementThe Record Supplement, Newspaper, Church of England.Google Scholar
Said 1978 Said, Edward W.Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books, 1978.Google Scholar
Sarkar 1931 Sarkar, Hem Chandra. The religion of Brahmo Samaj. Sadharan Brahmo Samaj, 1931.Google Scholar
Sastri 1911 Sastri, Sivanath. History of the Brahmo Samaji, vol. 1. Calcutta: R. Chatterji, 1911.Google Scholar
Sen 1993 Sen, A. P.Hindu Revivalism in Bengal, 1872–1905: Some Essays in Interpretation. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Sen 1938 Sen, K. C.Keshub Chunder Sen in England: Diary, Sermons, Addresses & Epistles. Navavidhan Publication Committee, 1938.Google Scholar
Sen 1901 Sen, K. C.Keshub Chunder Sen's Lectures in India. London and New York: Cassell and Company, 1901.Google Scholar
Sen 1889 Sen, K. C.The New Samhita or Sacred Laws of the Aryans of the New Dispensation. 2nd edition. Calcutta: Brahmo Tract Society, 1889.Google Scholar
Sen 1870 Sen, K. C.The Brahmo Somaj: Lectures and Tracts, ed. Collet, S. D.. London: Strahan & Co., 1870.Google Scholar
Slater 1884 Slater, T. E. “Keshab Chandra Sen and The Brahma Samaj.” Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge, 1884.Google Scholar
Smith 1988 Smith, W. C. “Scripture as Form and Concept: Their Emergence for the Western World.” In Rethinking Scripture: Essays from a Comparative Perspective, ed. Levering, M.. New York: State University of New York Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Stevens 2011 Stevens, J. A.“Colonial Subjectivity: Keshab Chandra Sen in London and Calcutta, 1870–1884.” Ph.D. thesis, University College London, 2011.Google Scholar
Symondson 1970 Symondson, A.The Victorian Crises of Faith. London: SPCK, 1970.Google Scholar
Thakur 1914 Thakur, M. D.Autobiography of Maharshi Devendranath Tagore. London; Bombay: Macmillan and Co., 1914.Google Scholar
Thapar 2000 Thapar, R. “Horseplay in Harappa.” Frontline 17:20 (Sep. 30–Oct. 13, 2000).Google Scholar
Thapar 1996 Thapar, R. (Jan.–Mar. 1996). “The Theory of Aryan Race and India: History and Politics.” Social Scientist 24:1/3 (1996), pp. 3–29.Google Scholar
Todd 1992 Todd, M.The Early Germans. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 1992.Google Scholar
Trautmann 2004 Trautmann, T. R.Aryans and British India. New Delhi: Yoda Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Whewell 1837 Whewell, William E.History of the Inductive Sciences, from the Earliest to the Present Times. London: John W. Parker; Cambridge: J. and J. J. Deighton, 1837.Google Scholar