Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:48:34.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Further thoughts on Asian Studies “inside-out”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2021

Allan Punzalan Isaac ,
Johan Mathew ,
Anjali Nerlekar ,
Paul Schalow  and
Tamara Sears
Allan Punzalan Isaac*
Affiliation:
Global Asias Collaborative, Center for Cultural Analysis, Rutgers University–New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
Johan Mathew
Affiliation:
Global Asias Collaborative, Center for Cultural Analysis, Rutgers University–New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
Anjali Nerlekar
Affiliation:
Global Asias Collaborative, Center for Cultural Analysis, Rutgers University–New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
Paul Schalow
Affiliation:
Global Asias Collaborative, Center for Cultural Analysis, Rutgers University–New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
Tamara Sears
Affiliation:
Global Asias Collaborative, Center for Cultural Analysis, Rutgers University–New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Allan Punzalan Isaac, E-mail: allan.isaac@rutgers.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In response to Sato and Sonoda's “Asian Studies ‘inside out’: research agenda for the development of Global Asian Studies,” members of the Global Asias Collaborative at Rutgers University – comprised of a diverse group of scholars of Asia and the Asian diaspora located in history, literature, art history, geography, among other disciplines – offer responses to this generative prompt to remap the place and field of “Asia” in its heterogeneous and interwoven temporalities and topologies.

Keywords

Globalizationknowledge productionpluralitiestemporalitiestopologiesWest Asia
Type
Perspectives on Asia
Information
International Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , July 2021 , pp. 217 - 224
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chua Beng, Huat, Dean, Ken, Engseng, Ho, Chong, Ho Kong, Rigg, Jonathan and Yeoh, Brenda (2019). “Area Studies and the Crisis of Legitimacy: A View from South East Asia.” South East Asia Research 27:1, pp. 31–48.Google Scholar
Dodson, M.S. (2019). Excavating the Vishwanath Corridor in Varanasi, India. PLATFORM, published online 14 October 2019. Available at https://www.platformspace.net/home/excavating-the-vishwanath-corridor-in-varanasi-india (accessed 12 December 2019).Google Scholar
Duara, P. (2010). “Asia Redux: Conceptualizing a Region for Our Times.” The Journal of Asian Studies 69:4, pp. 963–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gongkatsang, T and Willis, M. (2013). “Tibetan, Burmese and Chinese Inscriptions from Bodhgayā in the British Museum.” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 23:3, pp. 429–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guy, J. (1993/94). “The Lost Temples of Nagapattinam and Quanzhou: A Study in Sino-Indian Relations.” Silk Road Art and Archaeology 3, pp. 291–310.Google Scholar
Lee, Risha. (2009). “Rethinking Community: The Indic Carvings of Quanzhou.” In Nagapattinam to Suvarnadwipa: Reflections on the Chola Naval Expeditions to Southeast Asia, eds. Kulke, H., Kesavapany, K. and Sakhuja, V., pp. 240–70. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Sen, T. (2017). India, China, and the World: A Connected History. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty (2008). Other Asias. Malden, Mass: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tsing, Anna (2009). “Supply Chains and the Human Condition.” Rethinking Marxism 21:2, pp. 148–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar