Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:18:33.597Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Semi-automated operation of Mars Climate Simulation chamber – MCSC modelled for biological experiments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2016

M.V. Tarasashvili*
Affiliation:
Iv. Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Department of the Exact and Natural Sciences, I. Chavchavadze Avenue, Tbilisi 0128, Ceorgia
Sh.A. Sabashvili
Affiliation:
Iv. Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Department of the Exact and Natural Sciences, I. Chavchavadze Avenue, Tbilisi 0128, Ceorgia
S.L. Tsereteli
Affiliation:
Iv. Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Department of the Exact and Natural Sciences, I. Chavchavadze Avenue, Tbilisi 0128, Ceorgia
N.D. Aleksidze
Affiliation:
Iv. Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Department of the Exact and Natural Sciences, I. Chavchavadze Avenue, Tbilisi 0128, Ceorgia
O. Dalakishvili
Affiliation:
Georgia Technical University, Department of the Electronics and Magnetic Fields, 77 Kostava street, Tbilisi 0175, Georgia

Abstract

The Mars Climate Simulation Chamber (MCSC) (GEO PAT 12 522/01) is designed for the investigation of the possible past and present habitability of Mars, as well as for the solution of practical tasks necessary for the colonization and Terraformation of the Planet. There are specific tasks such as the experimental investigation of the biological parameters that allow many terrestrial organisms to adapt to the imitated Martian conditions: chemistry of the ground, atmosphere, temperature, radiation, etc. MCSC is set for the simulation of the conduction of various biological experiments, as well as the selection of extremophile microorganisms for the possible Settlement, Ecopoesis and/or Terraformation purposes and investigation of their physiological functions. For long-term purposes, it is possible to cultivate genetically modified organisms (e.g., plants) adapted to the Martian conditions for future Martian agriculture to sustain human Mars missions and permanent settlements. The size of the chamber allows preliminary testing of the functionality of space-station mini-models and personal protection devices such as space-suits, covering and building materials and other structures. The reliability of the experimental biotechnological materials can also be tested over a period of years. Complex and thorough research has been performed to acquire the most appropriate technical tools for the accurate engineering of the MCSC and precious programmed simulation of Martian environmental conditions. This paper describes the construction and technical details of the equipment of the MCSC, which allows its semi-automated, long-term operation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aristov, Yu.I., Tokarev, M.M., Restuccia, G. & Cacciola, G. (1996). Selective water sorbents for multiple applications. 2. CaCl2 confined in micropores of silica gel: Sorption properties. React. Kinetics Catal. Lett. 59(2), 335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, B.J., Jenkins, D.G. & Schuerger, A.C. (2010). Inhibition of Escherichia coli and Serratia liquefaciens under high-salt, low-pressure, and low-temperature environments that approach surface conditions on Mars. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76(8), 23772386.Google Scholar
Calvin, M. & Gazenco, G. (1979). Foundation of Space Biology and Medicine, vol. 1, pp. 304311. Space as a Habitat.Google Scholar
Davis, I. & Fulton, J.D. (1959). The reactions of terrestrial microorganisms to simulated Martian conditions. In Proc. X Int. Astronautical Congress, London, p. 778. 2 Wien, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Davis, I., Craft, C.E. & Fulton, J.D. (1959). The relation of temperature and moisture to the survival and multiplication of selected bacteria subjected to a simulated Martian environment. Texas Rep. Biol. Med. 17, 198.Google Scholar
Dring, M.J. (1981) Chromatic adaptation of photosynthesis in benthic marine algae: an examination of its ecological significance using a theoretical model. Amer. Soc. Limnol. Oceanogr., 26(2), 271284.Google Scholar
Drollet, J.H., Teai, T., Faucon, M. & Martin, P.M.V. (1997). Field study of compensatory changes in UV-absorbing compounds in the mucus of the solitary coral Fungia repanda (Scleractinia: Fungiidae) in relation to solar UV radiation, sea-water temperature, and other coincident physico-chemical parameters. Mar. Freshwat. Res. 48(4), 329333.Google Scholar
Ehling-Schulz, M. & Scherer, S. (1999). UV protection in cyanobacteria. Eur. J. Phycol. 34(4), 329338.Google Scholar
Falkowski, P.G. & LaRoche, J. (1991). Acclimation to spectral irradiance in Algae. J. Phycol. 27, 814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritsch-Yelle, J.M., Charles, J.B., Jones, M.M. & Wood, M.L. (1996). Microgravity decreases heart rate and arterial pressure in humans. J. Appl. Physiol. 80(3), 910914.Google Scholar
Fulton, J.D. (1958). Survival of terrestrial microorganisms under simulated Martian conditions. In Physics and Medicine of the Atmosphere and Space. Wiley, New York, pp. 606613.Google Scholar
Galletta, G., Ferri, F., Fanti, G., D'Alessandro, M., Bertoloni, G., Pavarin, D., Bettanini, C., Cozza, P., Pretto, P., Bianchini, G. & Debei, S.S.A.M. (2006). The Italian Martian simulation chamber. Orig. Life Evol. Biosph. 36(5–6), 625627.Google Scholar
Gordeeva, L.G., Tokarev, M.M., Parmon, V.N. & Aristov, Yu.I. (1998). Selective water sorbents for multiple application. 6. Freshwater production from the atmosphere. React. Kinetics Catal. Lett. 65(1), 153.Google Scholar
Grindeland, R.E., Popova, I.A., Vasques, M. & Arnaud, S.B. (1990). Cosmos 1887 mission overview: effects of microgravity on rat body and adrenal weights and plasma constituents. FASEB J. 4, 105109.Google Scholar
Häder, D.-P. & Figueroa, F.L. (1997). Photoecophysiology of marine macroalgae. Photochem. Photobiol. 66, 114.Google Scholar
Horneck, G., Rettberg, P., Rabbow, E., Strauch, W., Seckmeyer, G., Facius, R., Reitz, G., Strauch, K. & Schott, J.-U. (1996). Biological dosimetry of solar radiation for different simulated ozone column thicknesses. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B: Biol. 32(3), 189196.Google Scholar
Horneck, G., Rettberg, P., Kozubek, S., Baumstark-Khan, C., Rink, H., Schäfer, M. & Schmitz, C. (1997). The influence of microgravity on repair of radiation-induced DNA damage in bacteria and human fibroblasts. Radiat. Res. 147(3), 376384.Google Scholar
Jager, C. & Minnaert, M.G.J. (2013) The Solar Spectrum. In Proc. Symp. held at the University of Utrecht, 26–31 August 1963, Springer, November 11, p. 417.Google Scholar
Jensen, L.L., Merrison, J., Hansen, A.A., Mikkelsen, K.A., Kristoffersen, T., Nornberg, P., Lomstein, B.A. & Finster, K. (2008). A facility for long-term Mars simulation experiments: the Mars Environmental Simulation Chamber (MESCH). Astrobiology 8(3), 537548.Google Scholar
Kehoe, D.M. & Grossman, A.R. (1994). Complementary chromatic adaptation: photoperception to gene regulation. Semin. Cell Biol. 5(5), 303313.Google Scholar
Klaus, D.M. (2002). Space microbiology: microgravity and microorganisms. In The Encyclopedia of Microbiology. ed. Britton, G. John Wiley & Sons, NY, pp. 29963004.Google Scholar
Moor, R. (1990). Comparative effectiveness of a clinostat and a slow-turning lateral vessel at mimicking the ultrastructural effects of microgravity in plant cells. Ann. Bot. 66(5), 541549.Google Scholar
Motamedi, K. et al. (2015). Design of a mars atmosphere simulation chamber and testing a Raman laser spectrometer (RLS) under conditions pertinent to Mars rover missions. EPJ Tech. Instrum. 2, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickerson, C.A., Ott, C.M. & Wilson, J.W., Ramamurthy, R. & Pierson, D.L. (2004). Microbial responses to microgravity and other low-shear environments. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 68(2), 3453611.Google Scholar
Quesada, A. & Vincent, W.F. (1997). Strategies of adaptation by Antarctic cyanobacteria to ultraviolet radiation. Eur. J. Phycol. 32(4), 335342.Google Scholar
Ramus, J. & van der Meer, J.P. (1983). A physiological test of the theory of complementary chromatic adaptation and color mutant of a red sea weed. J. Phycol. 19, 8691.Google Scholar
Schuerger, A.C., Mancinelli, R.L., Kern, R.G., Rothschild, L.J. & McKay, C.P. (2003). Survival of endospores of Bacillus subtilis on spacecraft surfaces under simulated Martian environments: implications for the forward contamination of Mars. Icarus 165(2), 253276.Google Scholar
Schuerger, A.C., Clausen, C. & Britt, D. (2011). Methane evolution from UV-irradiated spacecraft materials under simulated Martian conditions: implications for the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) mission. Icarus 213, 393403.Google Scholar
Schuerger, A.C., Moores, J.E., Clausen, C.A., Barlow, N.G. & Britt, D.T. (2012). Methane from UV-irradiated carbonaceous chondrites under simulated Martian conditions. J. Geophys. Res. 117, E08007, doi:10.1029/2011JE004023.Google Scholar
Smith, D.J., Schuerger, A.C., Davidson, M.M., Pacala, S.W., Bakermans, C. & Onstott, T.C. (2009). Survivability of psychrobacter cryohalolentis K5 under simulated Martian surface conditions. Astrobiology 9(2), 221228.Google Scholar
Stowe, W.C., Brodie-Kommit, J. & Stowe-Evans, E. (2011). Characterization of complementary chromatic adaptation in GloeotrichiaUTEX 583 and identification of a transposon-like insertion in the cpeBAOperon. Plant Cell Physiol. 52(3), 553562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stutte, G.W., Monje, O., Hatfield, R.D., Paul, A.L., Ferl, R.J. & Simone, C.G. (2004). Microgravity effects on leaf morphology, cell structure, carbon metabolism and mRNA expression of dwarf wheat. Planta 224(5), 10381049.Google Scholar
Tarasashvili, M.V. & Aleksidze, N.D. (2007) CCA – chromatic complementary adaptation and extraterrestrial life. In Bioastronomy: Molecules, Microbes and Extraterrestrial Life ASP Conf. Series, vol. 420, Proc. Workshop held 16–20 July 2007 in San Juan, Puerto Rico, ed. Meech, K.J., Keane, J.V., Mumma, M.J., Siefert, J.L. & Werthimer, D.J., p. 243, 2009. Astronomical Society of the Pacific, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Tarasashvili, M.V., Sabashvili, Sh.A., Tsereteli, S.L. & Aleksidze, N.D. (2013). New model of Mars surface irradiation for the climate simulation chamber ‘Artificial Mars’. Int. J. Astrobiol. 12, 161170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorington, L., Parascandola, L. & Cunningham, L. (1971). Visual and biologic aspects of an artificial sunlight illuminant. J. Illum. Eng. Soc. 1(1), 3341. Published online, 20 September 2013.Google Scholar
Vincent, W.F., Downes, M.T., Castenholz, R.W. & Howard-Williams, C. (1993). Community structure and pigment organisation of cyanobacteria-dominated microbial mats in Antarctica. Eur. J. Phycol. 28(4), 213221. Published online, 24 February 2007.Google Scholar
Warneck, P. (1964). Reactions of 1 D oxygen atoms in the photolysis of carbon dioxide. J. Chem. Phys. 41, 3435, Published online 02 July 2004.Google Scholar
Zhukova, A.I. & Kondratyev, I.I. (1965). On artificial Martian conditions reproduced for microbiological research. Life Sci. Space Res. 3, 120126. Source – USSR Academy of Sciences, Moscow.Google Scholar
Zill, L.P., Mack, R. & DeVincenzi, D.L. (1979). Mars ultraviolet simulation facility. J. Mol. Evol. 14(1–3), 7989.Google Scholar