Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:58:56.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The past, present: The Parthenon Sculptures dispute as an example of the ICPRCP’s role on claims barred by the non-retroactivity of the 1970 UNESCO Convention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2022

Letícia Machado Haertel Open the ORCID record for Letícia Machado Haertel [Opens in a new window]
Letícia Machado Haertel*
Affiliation:
Social Sciences School, Getúlio Vargas Foundation, Brazil
*
Email: lehaertel@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article analyzes the role played by the Intergovernmental Committee for Promoting the Return of Cultural Property to Its Countries of Origin or Its Restitution in Case of Illicit Appropriation (ICPRCP) in promoting the settlement of disputes barred by the non-retroactivity of the 1970 UNESCO Convention through an assessment of its impact on the dispute between Greece and the United Kingdom over the Parthenon Sculptures. The analysis first focuses on the ICPRCP’s regular mandate, followed by an evaluation of some “collateral effects” that it might have had on the dispute. Through the examination of all reports, recommendations, and decisions issued by the ICPRCP and the performance of a wider interdisciplinary case study, it is argued that the ICPRCP has had an impact on the dispute, both directly and indirectly. The value of these conclusions is to shed light on the complex factors in interplay in voluntary and non-binding dispute settlement mechanisms such as the ones performed by the ICPRCP and to represent a framework for further studies on the ICPRCP’s work and alternative dispute resolution methods in general.

Type
Article
Information
International Journal of Cultural Property , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , November 2021 , pp. 479 - 504
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the International Cultural Property Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bator, Paul. 1982. “An Essay on the International Trade in Art.” Stanford Law Review 34: 275–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beard, Mary. 2010. The Parthenon. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
Cardenas, Sonia. 2007. Conflict and Compliance: State Responses to International Human Rights Pressure. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chechi, Alessandro. 2013. “Plurality and Coordination of Dispute Settlement Methods in the Field of Cultural Heritage.” In Enforcing International Cultural Heritage Law, edited by Chechi, A. and Gordley, J., 177–206. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chechi, Alessandro. 2014. The Settlement of International Cultural Heritage Disputes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Divari-Valakou, Nicoletta. 2008. “Revisiting the Parthenon: National Heritage in a Global Age.” In Utimut: Past Heritage – Future Partnerships, edited by Gabriel, M. and Dahl, J., 116–22. Copenhagen: Eks-Skolens Trykkeri.Google Scholar
Feeley, Kathryn. 2004. Return the Parthenon Marbles. Weston Creek: MacArthur & Campbell.Google Scholar
Fincham, Derek. 2013. “The Parthenon Sculptures and Cultural Justice.” Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal 23: 943–1016.Google Scholar
Greenfield, Jeanette. 2007. The Return of Cultural Treasures. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haertel, Letícia. 2020. Fortdauernde Verletzungen und Rückführung von Kulturgut: Eine Fallstudie zur Neuvorlage des Falls der Parthenon Marbles vor dem EGMR. Master’s thesis, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
Hitchens, Christopher. 2008. “The Elgin Marbles.” In The Parthenon Marbles: The Case for Reunification, edited by Hitchens, C., 17–106. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Barbara. 2009. “Introduction to Parts II and III: Cultural Rights, Cultural Property, and International Trade.” In Art and Cultural Heritage: Law, Policy and Practice, edited by B. Hoffman, 89–93. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
ICPRCP (Intergovernmental Committee for Promoting the Return of Cultural Property to Its Countries of Origin or Its Restitution in Case of Illicit Appropriation). 1983. Report of the 3rd Session, Doc. CLT.83/CONF.216/8. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000057838 (accessed 19 November 2020).Google Scholar
ICPRCP. 1985. Secretariat Report of the 4th Session, Doc. CLT.85/CONF.202/2. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000063223 (accessed 18 November 2020).Google Scholar
ICPRCP. 1986. Standard Form Concerning Requests for Return or Restitution. http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CLT/movable/pdf/form_returnEN_FR_03.pdf (accessed 10 November 2020).Google Scholar
ICPRCP. 1987. Report of the 5th Session, Doc. 24 C/94. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000075160 (accessed 20 November 2020).Google Scholar
ICPRCP. 1989. Report of the 6th Session, Doc. 25 C/91. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000083117 (accessed 20 November 2020).Google Scholar
ICPRCP. 1991. Report of the 7th Session, Doc. 26 C/92. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000089231 (accessed 20 November 2020).Google Scholar
ICPRCP. 1994. Report of the 8th Session, Doc. 27 C/102. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000101444 (accessed 20 November 2020).Google Scholar
ICPRCP. 1996. Report of the 9th Session, Doc. 29 C/REP.12. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000108937 (accessed 20 November 2020).Google Scholar
ICPRCP. 1999. Report of the 10th Session, Doc. 30 C/REP.14. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000117401 (accessed 20 November 2020).Google Scholar
ICPRCP. 2001. Secretariat Report of the 11th Session, Doc. CLT.2001/CONF.202/2. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000121239 (accessed 20 November 2020).Google Scholar
ICPRCP. 2003. Report of the 12th Session, Doc. 32 C/REP/15. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000130725 (accessed 20 November 2020).Google Scholar
ICPRCP. 2005a. Report of the 13th Session, Doc. 33 C/REP 15. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000140529 (accessed 20 November 2020).Google Scholar
ICPRCP. 2005b. Secretariat Report of the 13th Session, Doc. CLT-2005/CONF.202/. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000138284 (accessed 20 November 2020).Google Scholar
ICPRCP. 2007a. Secretariat Report of the 14th Session, Doc. CLT.2007/CONF.211/COM.14/2. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000150912 (accessed 20 November 2020).Google Scholar
ICPRCP. 2007b. Report of the 14th Session, Doc. 34 C/REP/14. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000152720_eng (accessed 20 November 2020).Google Scholar
ICPRCP. 2009a. Secretariat Report of the 15th Session, Doc. CLT.2009/CONF.212/COM.15/2. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000182210_eng (accessed 20 November 2020).Google Scholar
ICPRCP. 2009b. Recommendations Adopted at the 15th Session, Doc. CLT-2009/CONF.212/COM.15/8 REV. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000182548 (accessed 20 November 2020).Google Scholar
ICPRCP. 2009d. Strategy Proposals for the Future Work of the Committee, Doc. CLT-2009/CONF.212/COM.15/3 REV. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000182235_eng (accessed 20 November 2020).Google Scholar
ICPRCP. 2009e. Report on the 2008–2009 Activities and the Fifteenth Session of the Intergovernmental Committee for Promoting the Return of Cultural Property to Its Countries of Origin or Its Restitution in Case of Illicit Appropriation, Doc. 35 C/REP/14. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000183741_eng (accessed 20 December 2020).Google Scholar
ICPRCP. 2010a. Recommendations Adopted at the 16th Session, Doc. CLT-2010/CONF.203/COM.16/5. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000189639 (accessed 20 November 2020).Google Scholar
ICPRCP. 2010b. Secretariat Report of the 16th Session, Doc. CLT-2010/CONF.203/COM.16/8. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000187506_eng (accessed 20 November 2020).Google Scholar
ICPRCP. 2010c. Report of the 16th Session, Doc. CLT-2010/CONF.203/COM.16/6 REV. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000192583_eng (accessed 20 November 2020).Google Scholar
ICPRCP. 2011a. Secretariat Report of the 17th Session, Doc. CLT-2011/CONF.208/COM.17/2 REV. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000192728_eng (accessed 20 November 2020).Google Scholar
ICPRCP. 2011b. Recommendations Adopted at the 17th Session, Doc. CLT-2011/CONF.208/COM.17/5 REV. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000193720 (accessed 20 November 2020).Google Scholar
ICPRCP. 2012a. Recommendations Adopted at the 18th Session, Doc. 37 C/REP/14. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000222730 (accessed 20 November 2020).Google Scholar
ICPRCP. 2012b. Report of the 18th Session, Doc. ICPRCP/16/20.COM/Report. http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CLT/pdf/ICPRCP_FINAL_REPORT.pdf (accessed 20 November 2020).Google Scholar
ICPRCP. 2014a. Recommendations Adopted at the 19th Session, Doc. ICPRCP/14/19.COM/8. http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CLT/19_ICPRCP_Recommendations_en_final.pdf (accessed 20 November 2020).Google Scholar
ICPRCP. 2014b. Report of the 19th Session, Doc. 38 C/REP/20. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000234092 (accessed 20 November 2020).Google Scholar
ICPRCP. 2016a. Recommendations Adopted at the 20th Session, Doc. ICPRCP/16/20.COM/Decisions. http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CLT/pdf/ICPRCP_final_01.pdf (accessed 20 November 2020).Google Scholar
ICPRCP. 2016b. Report of the 20th Session, Doc. ICPRCP/16/20.COM/Report. http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CLT/pdf/ICPRCP_FINAL_REPORT.pdf (accessed 20 November 2020).Google Scholar
ICPRCP. 2016c. Secretariat Report of the 20th Session, Doc. ICPRCP/16/20.COM/5. http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CLT/pdf/Final_Secretariat_report_En.pdf (accessed 20 November 2020).Google Scholar
ICPRCP. 2018a. Report of the 21st Session, Doc. ICPRCP/18/21.COM/Report. http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CLT/movable/pdf/21_COM_ICPRCP_EN_FINAL.pdf (accessed 20 November 2020).Google Scholar
ICPRCP. 2018b. Recommendations Adopted at the 21st Session, Doc. ICPRCP/18/21.COM/Decisions. http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CLT/movable/pdf/21_ICPRCP_EN_FINAL_01.pdf (accessed 20 November 2020).Google Scholar
ICPRCP. 2021a. Report of the Secretariat on the Follow-up to the Recommendations and Decisions Adopted during the 21st Session, Doc. ICPRCP/21/22.COM/5.Corr. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000378810 (accessed 17 January 2022).Google Scholar
ICPRCP. 2021b. Decisions, Doc. ICPRCP/21/22.COM/Decisions. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379856 (accessed 17 January 2022).Google Scholar
Jenkins, Ian. 2001. Cleaning and Controversy: The Parthenon Sculptures (1811–1939). London: British Museum.Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, Carrie. 2018. “Alternative Dispute Resolution.” In Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, Carrie, Love, Lela, Schneider, Andrea, and Sternlight, Jean. 2018. Dispute Resolution: Beyond the Adversarial Model. New York: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Mommsen, Theodor. 1941. “The Venetians in Athens and the Destruction of the Parthenon in 1687.” American Journal of Archaeology 45: 544–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Keefe, Patrick. 2007. Commentary on the UNESCO 1970 Convention. Leicester, UK: Institute of Art and Law.Google Scholar
Ognibene, William. 2019. “Lost to the Ages: International Patrimony and the Problem Faced by Foreign States in Establishing Ownership of Looted Antiquities.” Brooklyn Law Review 84, no. 2: 605–33.Google Scholar
Pavan, Massimiliano. 1983. L’Aventura dell’ Partenone. Florence: Sansoni.Google Scholar
Pellet, Allan and Barsac, Tessa. 2019. “Litigation Strategy.” In Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Prott, Lyndel. 2009. Witnesses to History: A Compendium of Documents and Writings on the Return of Cultural Objects. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Prott, Lyndel. 2012. Strengths and Weaknesses of the 1970 Convention: An Evaluation 40 Years after Its Adoption. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Prott, Lyndel, and O’Keefe, Patrick. 1990. Law and the Cultural Heritage, vol. 3. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Robertson, Geoffrey. 2001. “A Tale of Three Documents: Lord Elgin and the Missing, Historic 1801 Ottoman Document.” Cardozo Law Review 22: 1853–83.Google Scholar
Robertson, Geoffrey. 2002. “Lord Elgin and the Ottomans: The Question of Permission.” Cardozo Law Review 23: 449–71.Google Scholar
Robertson, Geoffrey. 2019. Who Owns History? Elgin’s Loot and the Case for Returning Plundered Treasure. London: Penguin Random House.Google Scholar
Shaw, Malcolm. 2017. International Law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shehade, Maria, and Fouseki, Kalliopi. 2016. “The Politics of Culture and the Culture of Politics: Examining the Role of Politics and Diplomacy in Cultural Property Disputes.” International Journal of Cultural Property 23: 357–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Arthur. 1916. “Lord Elgin and His Collection.” Journal of Hellenic Studies 36: 163–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
St Clair, William. 1998. Lord Elgin and the Marbles. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokstad, Marilyn, and Oppenheimer, Margaret. 1999. Art: A Brief History. Hoboken, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Stamatoudi, Irini. 2016. “Alternative Dispute Resolution and Insights on Cases of Greek Cultural Property: The J.P. Getty Case, the Leon Levy and Shelby White Case, and the Parthenon Marbles Case.” International Journal of Cultural Property 23: 433–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thirlway, Hugh. 2006. “Advisory Opinions.” In Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). 1968. Resolutions Adopted at the 15th General Conference, Doc. 15C/RES/3.343. http://ulis2.unesco.org/images/0011/001140/114047EO.pdf (accessed 22 November 2020).Google Scholar
UNESCO. 1970a. Resolutions Adopted at the 16th General Conference, Doc. 16C/Resolutions. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000114046_fre?posInSet=27&queryId=N-31f32f4a-2c3a-4e10-88c5-9033603a556b (accessed 22 November 2020).Google Scholar
UNESCO. 1970b. Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property. http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CLT/pdf/OPERATIONAL_GUIDELINES_EN_FINAL_FINAL.pdf (accessed 22 November 2020).Google Scholar
UNESCO. 1976. Report of the Committee of Experts, Doc. SHC-76/CONF.615/3. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000023694 (accessed 22 November 2020).Google Scholar
UNESCO. 1978. Resolutions Adopted at the 20th General Conference, Doc. 20C/Resolutions. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000114032_fre?posInSet=22&queryId=N-31f32f4a-2c3a-4e10-88c5-9033603a556b (accessed 22 November 2020).Google Scholar
UNESCO. 2005. Resolutions Adopted at the 33rd General Conference, Doc. 33C/Resolutions. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000142825_fre?posInSet=8&queryId=N-2ab2cdfe-04d8-4937-ac38-38d15546a91b (accessed 22 November 2020).Google Scholar
UNESCO. 2010. Rules of Procedure for Mediation and Conciliation in Accordance with Article 4, Paragraph 1, of the Statutes of the ICPRCP. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000192534_eng (accessed 22 November 2020).Google Scholar
UNESCO. 2014. Report on the Evaluation of the Internal Oversight Service. http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CLT/pdf/4_Report_IOS_Strategy_19_ICPRCP_en.pdf (accessed 22 November 2020).Google Scholar
UNESCO. 2019. Information Kit on the 1970 Convention. http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CLT/pdf/Infokit_ENG.pdf (accessed 22 November 2020).Google Scholar
Van Beurden, Jos. 2017. Treasures in Trusted Hands: Negotiating the Future of Colonial Cultural Objects. Leiden: Sidestone.Google Scholar
Waxman, Sharon. 2008. Loot! The Battle over the Stolen Treasures of the Ancient World. New York: Brécourt Academic.Google Scholar
Woodhouse, John, and Pepin, Sarah. 2017. The Parthenon Sculptures: Briefing Paper no. 02075. London: House of Commons Library.Google Scholar
World Conference on Cultural Properties. 1982. Final Report and Recommendations. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000052505 (accessed 10 November 2020).Google Scholar