Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:35:01.062Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

(Re)Introducing the International Journal of Cultural Property

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2005

Alexander A. Bauer
Affiliation:
Editor, International Journal of Cultural Property. Email: culturalproperty@cambridge.org

Extract

The term “cultural heritage” contains an inherent tension. On the one hand, “culture” suggests something dynamic: it represents the diverse values and practices of different social groups, which continually evolve as they interact with others and their membership changes. On the other hand, “heritage” (and likewise “property”) implies something more clearly defined and static: it refers to a specific object or tradition passed on from generation to generation with little to no significant change. The difficulty in resolving these opposing forces—change versus stability—underlies why protecting, controlling, and possessing cultural heritage is so difficult to regulate in law, policy, and practice.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2005 International Cultural Property Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, Michael F. Who Owns Native Culture? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.
Merryman, John Henry. “Two Ways of Thinking About Cultural Property.” American Journal of International Law 80 (1986): 83153.Google Scholar
O'Keefe, Patrick J., and Lyndel V. Prott. Law and the Cultural Heritage, Vol. 3, Movement. London: Butterworths, 1989.
Palmer, Norman. “Editorial.” International Journal of Cultural Property 1 (1992): 57.Google Scholar
Renfrew, Colin. “Foreword.” In Trade in Illicit Antiquities: The Destruction of the World's Archaeological Heritage, edited by Neil Brodie, Jennifer Doole, and Colin Renfrew, xixii. Cambridge: MacDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 2001.
Shapiro, Daniel. “Repatriation: A Modest Proposal.” NYU Journal of International Law and Politics 31 (1998): 95108.Google Scholar