Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:47:03.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

De/reconstructing critical psychological jurisprudence: strategies of resistance and struggles for justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2010

Bruce A. Arrigo
Bruce A. Arrigo*
Affiliation:
Department of Criminal Justice and Criminology, University of North Carolina – Charlotte, NC.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The development of an integrated critical psychological jurisprudence (PJ) continues to elude researchers in theoretical and applied contexts. Indeed, the radical potential of a synthetic PJ that furthers the political aims of social change, collective good and citizen justice has yet to be sufficiently problematised or systematically reviewed in the extant literature. This article begins to address this deficiency. First, the social philosophy that informs and underscores radicalised PJ is described. This includes commentary on its underlying symbolic, linguistic, material and cultural footing. Second, several well-rehearsed theoretical strains of critical PJ are summarily presented. These strains consist of anarchism, critical legal studies, feminist jurisprudence and complex systems science. Third, a conceptual integration is undertaken that links radicalised PJ’s grounding in social philosophy with its established theoretical variants. This synthesis demonstrates the probing political project of critical PJ, especially as a humanising strategy of resistance and an evolving struggle for justice. This is a political project that seeks to de/reconstruct the images (aesthetic), narratives (epistemology), embodiments (ethic) and reproductions (ontology) at the core of its nascent critique.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , December 2010 , pp. 363 - 396
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, K.(2006) ‘Feminist Lawyering and Legal Method’, Law and Social Inquiry 16: 373–404.Google Scholar
Althusser, L.(1963) For Marx. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Althusser, L.(1971) Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Altman, A.(1986) ‘Legal Realism, Critical Legal Studies, and Dworkin. Philosphy and Public Affairs 17, 205–235.Google Scholar
Amster, R., Deleon, A., Fernandez, L. A., Nocella, A. J. and Shannon, D. (eds) (2009) Contemporary Anarchist Studies: An Introductory Anthology of Anarchy in the Academy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Anderson, E.(2000) ‘Feminist Epistemology and the Philosophy of Science’ in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Arrigo, B. A.(1992) ‘Deconstructing Jurisprudence: An Experiential Feminist Jurisprudence’, Journal of Human Justice 4, 13–30.Google Scholar
Arrigo, B. A.(1993) ‘An Experientially-Informed Feminist Jurisprudence: Rape and the Move Toward Praxis’, Humanity & Society 17, 28–47.Google Scholar
Arrigo, B. A.(1995a) ‘Rethinking the Language of Law, Justice, and Community: Postmodern Feminist Jurisprudence’ in Caudill, D. and Gold, S. (eds), Radical Philosophy of Law: Contemporary Challenges to Mainstream Legal Theory. Atlantic Heights, NJ: Humanities Press, 88–107.Google Scholar
Arrigo, B. A.(1995b) ‘The Peripheral Core of Law and Criminology: On Postmodern Social Theory and Conceptual Integration’, Justice Quarterly 12, 447–72.Google Scholar
Arrigo, B. A.(1996) The Contours of Psychiatric Justice: A Postmodern Critique of Mental Illness, Criminal Insanity, and the Law. New York & London: Garland.Google Scholar
Arrigo, B. A.(1998) ‘Marxist Criminology and Lacanian Psychoanalysis: Outline for a General Constitutive Theory of Crime’ in Ross, J. I. (ed.), Cutting the Edge: Current Perspectives in Radical/Critical Criminology and Criminal Justice. Westport, CT: Praeger, 40–62.Google Scholar
Arrigo, B. A. (ed.) (1999) Social Justice/Criminal Justice: The Maturation of Critical Theory in Law, Crime, and Deviance. Belmont, CA: West/Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Arrigo, B. A.(2000) ‘Social Justice and Critical Criminology. On Integrating Knowledge’, Contemporary Justice Review 3, 7–37.Google Scholar
Arrigo, B. A.(2001) ‘Transcarceration: A Constitutive Ethnography of Mentally Ill Offenders’, The Prison Journal 81, 162–86.Google Scholar
Arrigo, B. A.(2002a) ‘The Critical Perspective in Psychological Jurisprudence: Theoretical Advances and Epistemological Assumptions’, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 25(1): 151–72.Google Scholar
Arrigo, B. A.(2002b) Punishing the Mentally Ill: A Critical Analysis of Law and Psychiatry. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Arrigo, B. A.(2003a) ‘Justice and the Deconstruction of Psychological Jurisprudence: The Case of Competency to Stand Trial’, Theoretical Criminology 7: 55–88.Google Scholar
Arrigo, B. A.(2003b) ‘Psychology and the Law: The Critical Agenda for Citizen Justice and Radical Social Change’, Justice Quarterly 20: 399–444.Google Scholar
Arrigo, B. A.(2004a) The Ethics of Therapeutic Jurisprudence: A Critical and Theoretical Inquiry of Law, Psychology, and Crime’, Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law: An Interdisciplinary Journal 11: 23–43.Google Scholar
Arrigo, B. A. (ed.) (2004b) Psychological Jurisprudence: Critical Explorations in Law, Crime, And Society. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrigo, B. A. and Barrett, L. (2008) ‘Philosophical Criminology and Complex Systems Science: Towards a Critical Theory of Justice’, Critical Criminology: An International Journal 16: 165–84.Google Scholar
Arrigo, B. A. and Fox, D. (2009) ‘Psychology and Law: The Crime of Policy and the Search for Justice’ in Fox, D.Prilleltensky, I. and Austin, S. (eds), Critical Psychology: An Introduction, 2nd edn. London: Sage, 159–75.Google Scholar
Arrigo, B. A. and Milovanovic, D. (2009) Revolution in Penology: Rethinking the Society of Captives. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Arrigo, B. A. and Milovanovic, D. (2010) ‘Introduction: Postmodern and Post-Structural Criminology’ in Arrigo, B. A. and Milovanovic, D. (eds), Postmodernist and Post-Structuralist Theories of Crime. Farnham: Ashgate, xi–xxiv.Google Scholar
Arrigo, B. A., Milovanovic, D. and Schehr, R. C. (2005) The French Connection in Criminology: Rediscovering Crime, Law, and Social Change. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Arrigo, B. A. and Schehr, R. C. (1998) ‘Restoring Justice for Juveniles: A Critical Analysis of Victim–Offender Mediation. Justice Quarterly 15(4): 629–66.Google Scholar
Arrigo, B. A. and Williams, C. R. (1999) ‘Chaos Theory and the Social Control Thesis: A Post-Foucauldian Analysis of Mental Illness and Involuntary Civil Confinement’, Social Justice 26: 177–207.Google Scholar
Bakunin, M.(1974) Michael Bakunin: Selected Writings. New York: Grove.Google Scholar
Balkin, J. M.(1987) ‘Deconstructive Practice and Legal Theory’, Yale Law Journal 96: 743–86.Google Scholar
Bankowski, Z.(1983) ‘Anarchism, Marxism, and the Critique of Law’ in Sugarman, D. (ed.), Legality, Ideology, and the State. New York: Academic Press, 267–92.Google Scholar
Bartlett, K. T.(1989) ‘Feminist legal methods’, Harvard Law Review 109: 828–89.Google Scholar
Bartlett, K. T.(1991) ‘Feminist Legal Method’ in Bartlett, K. and Kennedy, R. (eds), Feminist Legal Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 393–413.Google Scholar
Bartlett, K. T.(2000) ‘Cracking Foundations as Feminist Method’, American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy, and Law 8: 31–55.Google Scholar
Bartlett, K. T. and Kennedy, R. (1991) ‘Introduction’ in Bartlett, K. T. and Kennedy, R. (eds), Feminist Legal Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1–11.Google Scholar
Barton, S.(1994) ‘Chaos, Self-organization, and Psychology’, American Psychologist 49: 5–14.Google Scholar
Baudrillard, J.(1972) For a Critique of the Political Economy of The Sign. St Louis, MO: Telos Press.Google Scholar
Baudrillard, J.(1976) L’exchange symbolique et la mort. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Baudrillard, J.(1983a) Simulations. New York: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
Baudrillard, J.(1983b) In the Shadow of the Silent Majorities. New York: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
Bauman, Z.(2000) Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Beaman-hall, L.(1996) ‘Legal Ethnography: Exploring the Gendered Nature of Legal Method’, Critical Criminology: An International Journal 7: 53–74.Google Scholar
Belliotti, R. A.(1995) ‘The Legacy of Marxist Jurisprudence’ in Caudill, D. and Gold, S. (eds), Radical Philosophy of Law: Contemporary Challenges to Mainstream Legal Theory and Practice. Atlantic Heights, NJ: Humanities Press, 3–32.Google Scholar
Bergeron, M.(1996). ‘Hegemony, Law, and Psychiatry’, Feminist Legal Studies 4: 49–72.Google Scholar
Bohan, J. S.(1997) ‘Regarding Gender: Essentialism, Constructionism, and Feminist Psychology’ in Gergen, M. and Davis, S. N. (eds), Toward a New Psychology of Gender: A Reader. New York: Routledge, 31–47.Google Scholar
Bottomley, A.(1987) ‘Feminism in Law Schools’ in McLaughlin, S. (ed.), Women and the Law. London: University of London Press, 32–51.Google Scholar
Briggs, J. and Peat, F. D. (1989) Turbulent Mirror. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Brion, D.(1993) ‘The Hidden Persistence of Witchcraft’, Law & Critique 4: 227–52.Google Scholar
Bullock, J. L. and Arrigo, B. A. (2006) ‘The Myth that Mental Illness Causes Crime’ in Bohm, R. M. and Walker, J. T. (eds), Demystifying Crime and Criminal Justice. Los Angles, CA: Roxbury Press, 12–19.Google Scholar
Butler, J.(1992) ‘Contingent Foundations: Feminism and the Question of “Postmodernism”’ in Butler, J. and Scott, J. W. (eds), Feminists Theorize the Political. London: Routledge, 3–21.Google Scholar
Butz, M.(1992) ‘The Fractal Nature of the Development of the Self’, Psychological Reports 71: 1043–63.Google Scholar
Butz, M.(1994) ‘Psychopharmacology: Psychology’s Jurassic Park’, Psychotherapy 31: 692–98.Google Scholar
Butz, M.(1997) Chaos and Complexity: Implications for Psychological Theory and Practice. Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Carrasco, E.(1996) ‘Oppression, Justice, Structuralism, and Particularity: Intersections Between Latcrit Theory and Law and Development Studies’, University of Miami Inter-American Law Review 28: 313–28.Google Scholar
Caudill, D.(1997) Lacan and the Subject of Law: Toward a Psychoanalytic Critical Legal Theory. Atlantic Heights, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, L. L.(1994) ‘Future Adventures in Psychology’s Jurassic Park: The Issue of Psychopharmacology’, Psychotherapy Bulletin 29: 47–50.Google Scholar
Chang, R. S. and Gotanda, N. (2007) ‘The Race Question in Latcrit Theory and Asian American Jurisprudence’, Nevada Law Journal 7: 1012–29.Google Scholar
Cheliotis, L. K.(2005) ‘Penal Managerialism from Within: Implications for Theory and Research’, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 29: 397–404.Google Scholar
Clarke, V. and Braun, V. (2009) ‘Gender’ in Fox, D.Prilleltensky, I. and Austin, S. (eds), Critical Psychology: An Introduction, 2nd edn. London: Sage, 232–49.Google Scholar
Cohen, D. and Mccubbin, M. (1990) ‘The Political Economy of Tardive Dyskinesia: Asymmetries in Power and Responsibility’, Journal of Mind and Behavior 11: 465–88.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. and Stewart, I. (1994) The Collapse of Chaos. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Coker, D.(2001) ‘Crime Control and Feminist Law Reform in Domestic Violence Law’, Buffalo Criminal Law Review 4: 801–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, P. H.(1990). Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. Hammersmith: Harper Collins Academic.Google Scholar
Coombe, R.(1992) ‘Publicity Rights and Political Aspiration: Mass Culture, Gender Identity, and Democracy’, New England Law Review 24: 1221–80.Google Scholar
Coombes, L., Morgan, M., Tuffin, K. and Johnson, M. (2004) ‘Critical Legal Psychology: Readings of the Relationship Between Psychology and Law Informed by Critical Legal Studies and Critical Psychology’, International Journal of Critical Psychology 11: 30–49.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, R.(1988) ’Race, Reform, and Retrenchment: Transformation and Legitimation in Antidiscrimination’, Harvard Law Review 101: 1356–87.Google Scholar
Cresswell, M.(2009) ‘Psychiatric Survivors and Experiential Rights’, Social Policy and Society 8: 231–43.Google Scholar
Dallaire, B, Mccubbin, M., Morin, P. and Cohen, D. (2000) ‘Civil Commitment Due to Mental Illness and Dangerousness: The Union of Law and Psychiatry Within a Treatment-Control System’, Sociology of Health and Illness 22: 679–99.Google Scholar
Delgado, R. and Stefancic, J. (2001) Critical Race Theory. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J.(1973) Speech and Other Phenomena. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J.(1977) Of Grammatology. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J.(1978) Writing and Difference. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J.(1991). The Force of Law: The Mythical Foundations of Authority. Paris: Galilee.Google Scholar
Derrida, J.(1992) ‘The Force of Law: The Mystical Foundation of Authority’ in Cornell, D.Rosenfeld, M. and Carlson, D. (eds), Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice. New York: Routledge, 3–67.Google Scholar
Derrida, J.(1994) Spectres of Marx: The State of Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International, trans. Kaufman, P.. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H.(1995) The Science and Politics of Comparing Women and Men’, American Psychologist 50: 145–58.Google Scholar
Ferrell, J.(1999). ‘Anarchist Criminology and Social Justice’ in Arrigo, B. (ed.), Social Justice/Criminal Justice: The Maturation of Critical Theory in Law, Crime, and Deviance. Belmont, CA: West/Wadsworth, 93–108.Google Scholar
Foucault, M.(1965) Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Foucault, M.(1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Foucault, M.(1973) The Order of Things. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Foucault, M.(1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of a Prison. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Foucault, M.(1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interview and Other Writings, 1972–1977. London: Harvester.Google Scholar
Fox, D. R.(1991) ‘Social Science’s Limited Role in Resolving Psycholegal Social Problems’, Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 17: 117–24.Google Scholar
Fox, D. R.(1993a) ‘The Autonomy–Community Balance and the Equity–Law Distinction: Anarchy’s Task for Psychological Jurisprudence’, Behavioral Sciences and the Law 11: 97–109.Google Scholar
Fox, D. R.(1993b) ‘Psychological Jurisprudence and Radical Social Change’, American Psychologist 48: 234–41.Google Scholar
Fraser, N.(1997) Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the ‘Postsocialist’ Condition. New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Frazier, P. A. and Hunt, J. S. (1998) ‘Research on Gender and Law: Where Are We Going, Where Have We Been?’, Law and Human Behavior 22: 1–16.Google Scholar
Fromm, E. (1941/1994) Escape From Freedom. New York: Henry Holt & Company.Google Scholar
Fromm, E. (1955/2003) The Sane Society. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fromm, E. (1976/2005) To Have or to Be? London: Continuum International Publishing.Google Scholar
Frug, M. J.(1992) ‘Sexual Equality and Sexual Difference in American Law’, New England Law Review 36: 665–82.Google Scholar
Gardner, A.(1992) True and False Accusation of Child Sexual Abuse. Creskill, NJ: Creative Therapeutics.Google Scholar
Gilligan, C.(1982) In a Different Voice. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, C., Lyons, N. P. and Hammer, T. J. (1990) Making Connections. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Godwin, W.(1971) Enquiry Concerning Political Justice, ed. Carter, K. Codell. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goerner, S.(1994) Chaos and the Evolving Ecological Universe. Langhorne, PA: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Goldman, E.(1969) Anarchism and Other Essays. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Golfarb, P.(1992) ‘From the World of “Others”: Minority and Feminist Responses to Critical Legal Studies’, New England Law Review 26: 683–710.Google Scholar
Gramsci, A.(1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
Granfield, R. and Cloud, W. (2001) ‘Social Context and “Natural Recovery”: The Role of Social Capital in the Resolution of Drug Associated Problems’, Substance Use & Misuse 36: 1543–70.Google Scholar
Habermas, J.(1975) Legitimation Crises. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Harris, A.(1991) ‘Race and Essentialism in Feminist Legal Theory’ in Bartlett, K. T. and Kennedy, R. (eds), Feminist Legal Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 235–62.Google Scholar
Henry, S. and Milovanovic, D. (1991) ‘Constitutive Criminology’, Criminology 29: 293–316.Google Scholar
Howe, A.(1994) Punish and Discipline. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hunt, A.(1986) ‘The Theory of Critical Legal Studies’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 6: 1–45.Google Scholar
Kairys, D. (ed.) (1992) The Politics of Law. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Kauffman, S. A.(1991) ‘Antichaos and Adaptation’, Scientific American 265: 78–84.Google Scholar
Kellert, S.(1994) In the Wake of Chaos. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kelman, M.(1990) A Guide to Critical Legal Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Klare, K.(1979) ‘Law-making as Praxis’, Telos 40: 123–35Google Scholar
Kropotkin, P.(1902) Mutual Aid. Boston, MA: Extending Horizons Books.Google Scholar
Kropotkin, P.(1912) Modern Science and Anarchism. London: Unwin.Google Scholar
Lacan, J.(1977) Ecrits: A Selection. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Lacan, J.(1981) The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Lacan, J.(1985) Feminine Sexuality. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Lacan, J.(1991) L’Envers de La Psychanalyse. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (2001) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, 2nd edn. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Lahey, K.(1985) ‘. . .Until Women Themselves Have Told All That They Have To Tell. . .’, Osgoode Hall Law Journal 23: 519–41.Google Scholar
Littleton, C.(1987) ‘In Search of a Feminist Jurisprudence’, Harvard Women’s Law Journal, 10: 1–8.Google Scholar
Mackinnon, C.(1983) ‘Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: Toward Feminist Jurisprudence’, Signs 8: 635–58.Google Scholar
Mackinnon, C.(1987) Feminism Unmodified: Discourse on Life and Law. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mackinnon, C.(1989) Towards a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mackinnon, C.(1991a) ‘Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: Toward Feminist Jurisprudence’ in Bartlett, K. and Kennedy, R. (eds), Feminist Legal Theory: Readings in Law and Gender. Boulder, CO: Westview, 181–200.Google Scholar
Mackinnon, C.(1991b) ‘Difference and Dominance: On Sexual Discrimination’ in Bartlett, K. and Kennedy, R. (eds), Feminist Legal Theory: Readings in Law and Gender. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 81–94.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1844/1974) Capital, vol. 1. New York: International.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1859/1984) Contributions to a Critique of Political Economy. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Matsuda, M. M.(1993) ‘Public Response to Racist Speech: Considering the Victim’s Story’ in Matsuda, M. J.Lawrence, C. R.Delgado, R. and Crenshaw, K. W. (eds), Words That Wound: Critical Race Theory, Assaultive Speech, and the First Amendment. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 17–52.Google Scholar
Matsuda, M. J.(1996) Where is Your Body? Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Mccubbin, M.(2009). ‘Oppression and Empowerment: The Genesis of a Critical Analysis of Mental Health’ in Fox, D.Prilleltensky, I. and Austin, S. (eds), Critical Psychology: An Introduction. London: Sage, 300–316.Google Scholar
Mccubbin, M. and Cohen, D. (1996) ‘Extremely Unbalanced: Interest Divergence and Power Disparities Between Clients and Psychiatry’, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 19: 1–25.Google Scholar
Mccubbin, M. and Weisstub, D. N. (1998) ‘Toward a Pure Best Interests Model of Proxy Decision Making for Incompetent Psychiatric Patients’, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 21: 1–30.Google Scholar
Mcdermott, M. J.(1992) ‘The Personal is Empirical: Research Methods and Criminal Justice Education’, Journal of Criminal Justice Education 3: 237–49.Google Scholar
Melton, G. B.(1990) ‘Law, Science, and Humanity: The Normative Foundation of Social Science in Law’, Law and Human Behavior 14: 315–32.Google Scholar
Melton, G. B.(1992) ‘The Law is a Good Thing (Psychology is, too). Human Rights in Psychological Jurisprudence’, Law and Human Behavior 16, 381–98.Google Scholar
Melton, G. B. and Saks, M. J. (1986) ‘The Law as an Instrument of Socialization and Social Structure’ in Melton, G. B. (ed.), The Law as a Behavioral Instrument. Lincoln: University of Nebraska, 235–77.Google Scholar
Menkel-meadow, C.(1988) ‘Feminist Legal Theory: Critical Legal Studies and Legal Education or the Fem-Crits Go to Law School’, Journal of Legal Education 36: 61–79.Google Scholar
Milovanovic, D. (ed.) (1997) Chaos, Criminology, and Social Justice: The New Orderly (Dis)order. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Milovanovic, D.(2003). An Introduction to the Sociology of Law. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Milovanovic, D. and Thomas, J. (1989) ‘Overcoming the Absurd: Legal Struggle as Primitive Rebellion’, Social Problems 36: 48–60.Google Scholar
Morland, D.(1997) Demanding the Impossible: Human Nature and Politics in Nineteenth Century Social Anarchism. Washington: Cassell.Google Scholar
Mossman, M. J.(1986) Feminism and the Legal Method: The Difference it Makes’, Australian Journal of Law and Society 3: 30–52.Google Scholar
Naffine, N.(1990) Law and the Sexes: Explorations in Feminist Jurisprudence. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Pashukanis, E. (1924/2002) The General Theory of Law and Marxism. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction BooksGoogle Scholar
Pribán, J. (ed.) (2007) Liquid Society and its Law. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Prigogine, I. and Stengers, I. (1984) Order out of Chaos. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Rhode, D.(1991) ‘Feminist Critical Theories’ in Bartlett, K. and Kennedy, R. (eds), Feminist Legal Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 333–50.Google Scholar
Romero, A. P.(2007) ‘Methodological Descriptions: “Feminist” and “Queer” Legal Theory’, Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 19: 227–58.Google Scholar
Russell-brown, K.(2008) The Color of Crime, 2nd edn. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Sarason, S. B.(1982) ‘Community Psychology and the Anarchist Insight’ in Sarason, S. B. (ed.), Psychology and Social Action. New York: Praeger, 135–49.Google Scholar
Sartwell, C.(2008) Against the State: An Introduction to Anarchist Political Theory. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Sellers, B. G. and Arrigo, B. A. (2009) ‘Adolescent Transfer, Developmental Maturity, and Adjudicative Competence: An Ethical and Justice Policy Inquiry’, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 99(2): 101–155.Google Scholar
Shatz, M.(1972) The Essential Works of Anarchism. New York: Quadrangle Books.Google Scholar
Shon, P. and Arrigo, B. A. (2006) ‘Reality-based TV and Police–Citizen Encounters: The Intertextual Construction and Situated Meaning of Mental Illness-as-Punishment’, Punishment & Society: The International Journal of Penology 8(1): 59–85.Google Scholar
Small, M. A.(1993) ‘Advancing Psychological Jurisprudence’, Behavioral Sciences and the Law 11: 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smart, C.(1989) Feminism and the Power of Law. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smart, C.(1995) Law, Crime, and Sexuality: Essays in Feminism. Newbury Park. CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Smith, L.(2007) Chaos: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, P.(1995) ‘Feminist Legal Critics: The Reluctant Radicals’ in Caudill, D. and Gold, S. (eds), Radical Philosophy of Law: Contemporary Challenges to Mainstream Legal Theory. Atlantic Heights, NJ: Humanities Press, 73–87.Google Scholar
Sobell, L., Ellingstad, T. and Sobell, M. (2000) ‘Natural Recovery from Alcohol and Drug Problems: Methodological Review of the Research with Suggestions for Future Directions’, Addiction 95: 749–64.Google Scholar
Sonn, R.(1992) Anarchism. New York: Twayne.Google Scholar
Stewart, I.(1989) Does God Play Dice?: The Mathematics of Chaos. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tifft, L. and Sullivan, D. (1980) The Struggle to be Human: Crime, Criminology, and Anarchism. Orkney: Cienfuegos.Google Scholar
Tighe, J.(1986) ‘The New York Medico-legal Society: Legitimating an Unstable Union’, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 9: 231–43.Google Scholar
Tushnet, M. (1991) ‘Critical Legal Studies: A Political History’, Yale Law Journal 100: 1515–43.Google Scholar
Valdes, F. (1995) ‘Queer, Sissies, Dykes, and Tomboys: Deconstructing the Conflation of Sex, Gender, and Sexual Orientation in Euro-American Law and Society’, California Law Review 83: 1–377.Google Scholar
Valdes, F.(1996) ‘Foreword: Latina/O Ethnicities, Critical Race Theory, and Post-Identity Politics in Postmodern Legal Culture’, La Raza Law Journal 1: 11–35.Google Scholar
Van eenwyk, J.(1991) ‘Archetypes: The Strange Attractors of the Psyche ’, Journal of Analytical Psychology 36: 1–25.Google Scholar
Wahl, O. F.(1998) Media Madness: Public Images of Mental Illness. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Walters, G. D.(2002) ‘Developmental Trajectories, Transitions, and Nonlinear Dynamical Systems Theory: A Model of Crime Deceleration and Desistance’, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 46: 30–44.Google Scholar
West, R.(1989). ‘Feminism, Critical Social Theory, and Law’, University of Chicago Legal Forum 59–98.Google Scholar
West, R.(1991) ‘Jurisprudence and Gender” in Bartlett, K. and Kennedy, R. (eds), Feminist Legal Theory: Readings in Law and Gender.Boulder,CO: Westview Press, 201–234.Google Scholar
Wexler, D. B. and Winick, B. J. (eds) (1996)Law in a Therapeutic Key: Developments in Therapeutic Jurisprudence.Durham,NC: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wiener, R., Watts, B. A. and Stolle, D. P. (1993) ‘Psychological Jurisprudence and the Information Processing Paradigm’, Behavioral Sciences and the Law 11: 79–96.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, S.(1997) ‘Feminist Psychology’ in Fox, D. and Prilleltensky, I. (eds), Critical Psychology: An Introduction). London: Sage, 247–64.Google Scholar
Williams, C. R.(2004) ‘Anarchic Insurgencies: The Mythos of Authority and the Violence of Mental Health’ in Arrigo, B. A. (ed.), Psychological Jurisprudence: Critical Explorations in Law, Crime, and Society. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 43–74.Google Scholar
Williams, C. R. and Arrigo, B. A. (2001) ‘Anarchaos and Order: On the Emergence of Social Justice’, Theoretical Criminology 5: 223–52.Google Scholar
Williams, C. R. and Arrigo, B. A.. (2002) Law, Psychology, and Justice: Chaos Theory and the New (Dis)order. Albany,NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Williams, C. R. and Arrigo, B. A.. (2007) ‘Drug-Taking Behavior, Compulsory Treatment, and Desistance: Implications of Self-Organization and Natural Recovery for Policy and Practice’, Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 46: 57–80.Google Scholar
Williams, R.(1987) ‘Taking Rights Seriously: The Perils and Promise of Critical Legal Theory for People of Color’, Law and Inequality 5: 103–118.Google Scholar
winick, B. J. and wexler, D. B. (eds) (2003).Judging in a Therapeutic Key: Therapeutic Jurisprudence and the Courts.Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar