Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:03:51.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Islamic family law in Europe? From dichotomies to discourse – or: beyond cultural and religious identity in family law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2012

Andrea Büchler*
Affiliation:
University of Zurich

Abstract

In a number of European countries there are fears that foreign, particularly Islamic, family law is becoming entrenched. All parties to this discussion see themselves as under threat. Migrant populations claim their right to cultural identity, while their host countries' domestic populations see a risk to social cohesion. Family law brings the underlying tensions into sharp focus. Cultural and religious identity and family law are interrelated in a number of ways and raise various complex issues. European legal systems have taken various approaches to meeting these challenges, many of which have been apologetic, and few of which have been informed by theory. I propose to examine this complexity and indicate areas in which conflicts may arise by analysing a family-law case involving migrants living transnationally. I will include questions of international private law, comments on the various degrees of consideration accorded to cultural identity within substantive family law, and remarks on models of legal pluralism and the dangers that go along with them. I will conclude with an evaluation of approaches which are process-based rather than institution-based.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

An-Na'im, Abdullahi (1994) ‘Cultural Transformation and Normative Consensus on the Best Interests of the Child’, International Journal of Law and the Family 8(1): 6281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archbishop of canterbury, DrWilliams, Rowan (2008) ‘Civil and Religious Law in England: A Religious Perspective’, Lecture, Royal Courts of Justice. Available at: www.archbishopofcanterbury.org/articles.php/1137/archbishops-lecture-civil-and-religious-law-in-england-a-religious-perspective (last accessed 14 February 2012).Google Scholar
Bainham, Andrew (1995) ‘Family Law in a Pluralistic Society’, Journal of Law and Society 22(2): 234–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bano, Samia (2007) ‘Muslim Family Justice and Human Rights, the Experience of British Muslim Women’, Journal of Comparative Law 1(4): 3867.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla (2002) The Claims of Culture: Equality and Diversity in the Global Era. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, Marion (2004) Dispute Resolution in Family Law: Protecting Choice, Promoting Inclusion. Available at: www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/english/about/pubs/boyd/fullreport.pdf (accessed 11 January 2010).Google Scholar
Brophy, Julia, Jhutti-Johal, Jagbir and Owen, Charlie (2003) Significant Harm: Child Protection in a Multicultural Setting. London: Lord Chancellor's Department.Google Scholar
Büchler, Andrea (2011) Islamic Law in Europe? Legal Pluralism and its Limits in European Family Laws. Farnham/Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Foblets, Marie-Claire (2000) ‘Migrant Women Caught Between Islamic Family Law and Women's Rights: The Search for the Appropriate “Connecting Factor”’, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 7(1): 1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fux, Beat (2002) ‘Which Models of the Family Are Encouraged or Discouraged by Different Family Policies?’, in Kaufmann, Franz-Xaver, Kujisten, Anton, Schulze, Hans-Joachim and Peter Strohmeier, Klaus (eds), Family Life and Family Policies in Europe. Vol. 2: Problems and Issues in Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 363418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, John (1986) ‘What is Legal Pluralism?’, Journal of Legal Pluralism 24(1): 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, Franz-Xaver (2002) ‘Politics and Policies Towards the Family in Europe: A Framework and an Inquiry into Their Differences and Convergences’, in Kaufmann, Franz-Xaver, Kujisten, Anton, Schulze, Hans-Joachim and Peter Strohmeier, Klaus (eds), Family Life and Family Policies in Europe. Vol. 2: Problems and Issues in Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 419–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korbin, Juliet (1981) Child Abuse and Neglect: Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Krause, Harry (2006) ‘Comparative Family Law: Past Traditions Battle Future Trends – and Vice Versa’, in Reimann, Mathias and Zimmermann, Reinhard (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 10991130.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will (1995) Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mehra, Madhu (2007) ‘Women's Equality and Culture in the Context of Identity Politics’, Journal of Comparative Law 2(2): 637.Google Scholar
Nachmani, Amikam (2009) Europe and its Muslim Minorities: Aspects of Conflict, Attempts at Accord. Brighton: Sussex Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pearl, David and Menski, Werner (1998) Muslim Family Law, 3rd edn.London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
Poulter, Sebastian (1990) ‘The Claim to a Separate Islamic System of Personal Law for British Muslims’, in Mallat, Chibli and Connors, Jane (eds), Islamic Family Law. London/Dordrecht/Boston: Graham & Trotman, 147–66.Google Scholar
Poulter, Sebastian (1998) Ethnicity, Law and Human Rights: The English Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Catherine (2005) ‘Lifting Our Veil of Ignorance: Culture, Constitutionalism, and Women's Human Rights in Post-September 11 America’, Hastings Law Journal 57: 331–72.Google Scholar
Reitman, Oonagh (2005) ‘On Exit’, in Eisenberg, Avigail and Spinner-Halev, Jeff (eds), Minorities within Minorities: Equality, Rights and Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 189208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohe, Mathias (2004) ‘The Application of Islamic Family Law in German Courts and its Compatibility with German Public Policy’, in Basedow, Jürgen and Yassari, Nadjma (eds), Iranian Family and Succession Laws and their Application in German Courts. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1934.Google Scholar
Rude-Antoine, Edwige (1991) ‘Muslim Magrebian Marriage in France: A Problem for Legal Pluralism’, International Journal of Law and the Family 5(2): 93103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shachar, A. (2008) Multicultural Jurisdictions: Cultural Differences and Women's Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shah, Prakash (2005) Legal Pluralism in Conflict: Coping with Cultural Diversity in Law. London: Routledge Cavendish.Google Scholar
Shah-Kazemi, Sonia Nurin (2001) Untying the Knot: Muslim Women, Divorce and the Shariah. London: Nuffield Foundation.Google Scholar
Thomson, Ahmad (2004) ‘Incorporating Muslim Personal Law into UK Domestic Law’. AMSS (UK) 5th Annual Conference – Fiqh Today, Sunday 22 February 2004. Available at: www.wynnechambers.co.uk/pdf/AMSS-ATNotes220204.pdf (accessed 11 January 2010).Google Scholar
Van der veer, Peter (1994) Religious Nationalism, Hindus and Muslims in India. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volpp, Leti (2001) ‘Feminism Versus Multiculturalism’, Columbia Law Review 101(5): 1181–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welchman, Lynn (2007) Women and Muslim Family Laws in Arab States: A Comparative Overview of Textual Development and Advocacy. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Yilmaz, Ihsan (2003) ‘Muslim Alternative Dispute Resolution and Neo-Ijtihad in England’, Alternatives, Turkish Journal of International Relations 2(1): 117–39.Google Scholar
Yilmaz, Ihsan (2005) Muslim Laws, Politics and Society in Modern Nation States: Dynamic Legal Pluralisms in England, Turkey and Pakistan. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar