Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:38:05.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spatial justice: law and the geography of withdrawal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2010

Andreas Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos
Andreas Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos*
Affiliation:
School of Law, University of Westminster
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While spatial justice could be the most radical offspring of law’s recent spatial turn, it remains instead a geographically informed version of social justice. The majority of the existing literature on the subject has made some politically facile assumptions about space, justice and law, thereby subsuming the potentially radical into the banal. In this article, I suggest that the concept of spatial justice is the most promising platform on which to redefine, not only the connection between law and geography, but more importantly, the conceptual foundations of both law and space. More concretely, the article attempts two things: first, a radical understanding of legal spatiality. Space is not just another parameter for law, a background against which law takes place, or a process that the law needs to take into consideration. Space is intertwined with normative production in ways that law often fails to acknowledge, and part of this article is a re-articulation of the connection. Second, to suggest a conception of spatial justice that derives from a spatial law. Such a conception cannot rely on given concepts of distributive or social justice. Instead, the concept of spatial justice put forth here is informed by post-structural, feminist, post-ecological and other radical understandings of emplacement and justice, as well as arguably the most spatial of philosophical discourses, that of Deleuze–Guattari and the prescribed possibilities of space as manifold.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 6 , Special Issue 3: Law, Movement, Space , September 2010 , pp. 201 - 216
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amin, Ash and Thrift, Nigel (2002) Cities: Reimagining the Urban. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Arsic, Branka (2005) ‘Thinking Leaving’ in Buchanan, Ian and Gregg, Lambert (eds), Deleuze and Space. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Banakar, Reza (2008) ‘The Politics of Legal Cultures’, Retfaerd: The Nordic Journal of Law and Justice 31(4): 37–60.Google Scholar
Béland, Daniel and Lecours, André (2005) ‘The Politics of Territorial Solidarity: Nationalism and Social Policy Reform in Canada, the United Kingdom and Belgium’, Comparative Political Studies 38(6): 676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blomley, Nicolas, Delaney, David and Ford, Richard (2001) (eds), The Legal Geographies Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brighenti, Andrea (2006) ‘On Territory as Relationship and Law as Territory’, Canadian Journal of Law and Society 21(2): 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, Ian (2005) ‘Space in the Age of Non-Place’ in Buchanan, Ian and Gregg, Lambert (eds), Deleuze and Space. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Davoudi, Simin (2005) ‘Understanding Territorial Cohesion’, Planning, Practice and Research 20(4): 433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delanda, Manuel (2002) Intensive Science and Virtual Philosophy. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Delaney, David (2002) ‘Beyond the World: Law as a Thing of this World’, in Jane, Holder and Carolyn, Harrison (eds), Law and Geography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles (1993a) ‘The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque: The Pleats of Matter’, Architectural Design Profile No. 102.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles (1993b) The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque, trans. Conley, T.. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles (1997) Difference and Repetition, trans. Patton, P.. New York: Columbia.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles and Guattari, Félix (1983) Anti-Oedipus, trans. Hurley, R., Seem, M. and Lane, H. R.. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles and Guattari, Félix (1988) A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, trans. Massumi, B.. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques (1972) Positions, trans Bass, A.. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques (1992) ‘Force of Law: The “Mystical Foundation of Authority”’, trans. Quaintance, M., in Cornell, D., Rosenfeld, M. and Carlson, D.Gray (eds), Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dikeç, Mustafa (2001) ‘Justice and the Spatial Imagination’, Environment and Planning A 33: 1785–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dikeç, Mustafa (2002) ‘Police, Politics, and the Right to the City’, GeoJournal 58: 91–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doel, Marcus (1999) Poststructuralist Geographies: The Diabolical Art of Spatial Science. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellem, Bradon and Shields, John (1999) ‘Rethinking “Regional Industrial Relations”: Space, Place and the Social Relations of Work’, Journal of Industrial Relations 41(4): 536–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodrich, Peter (1995) Oedipus Lex. Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodrich, Peter, Douzinas, Costas and Hachamovitch, Yifat (1994) ‘Politics, Ethics and the Legality of the Contingent’, in Douzinas, , Goodrich, and Hachamovitch, (eds), Politics, Postmodernity and Critical Legal Studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gregory, Derek, Martin, Ron and Smith, Graham (1994) (eds), Human Geography: Society, Space and Social Science. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, David (1973) Social Justice and the City. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Harvey, David (1996) Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hay, Alan (1995) ‘Concepts of Equity, Fairness and Justice in Geographical Studies’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 20(4): 500–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamenka, Eugene and Tay, Alice Erh-Soon (1980) (eds), Justice. New York: St Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel (1978) Otherwise than Being: Or Beyond Essence, trans. Linghis, A.. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1997) Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (2004) Law as a Social System, trans. Ziegert, K., ed. Kastner, F., Nobles, R., Schiff, D. and Ziegert, R.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manderson, Desmond (2005) ‘Proximity and the Ethics of Law’, UNSW Law Journal 28(3): 697–720.Google Scholar
Massey, Doreen (2005) For Space. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Merleau-ponty, Maurice (1968) The Visible and the Invisible, trans. Lingis, A.. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, David (1979) Social Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pavic, Milorad (1993) The Inner Side of the Wind. Knopf, New York.Google Scholar
Philippopoulos-mihalopoulos, Andreas (2003) ‘Beauty and the Beast: Art and Law in the Hall of Mirrors’, Entertainment Law 2(3): 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philippopoulos-mihalopoulos, Andreas (2007) ‘Brasilia: Utopia Postponed’ in Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, A. (ed.) Law and the City. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philippopoulos-mihalopoulos, Andreas (2009) Niklas Luhmann: Law, Justice, Society. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philippopoulos-mihalopoulos, Andreas (2010a) ‘Law’s Spatial Turn: Law, Justice and a Certain Fear of Space’, Law, Culture and the Humanities 9.Google Scholar
Philippopoulos-mihalopoulos, Andreas (2010b) ‘Law’s Awnings of Justice: Repetition in de Chirico, Kierkegaard, Deleuze’ in Ben-Dor, Oren (ed.), Art and Law. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pile, Steven (1996) The Body and the City: Psychoanalysis, Subjectivity and Space. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pirie, G. H. (1983) ‘On Spatial Justice’, Environment and Planning A 15: 465–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soja, Edward (2000) Postmetropolis. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Soja, Edward (2009) ‘Taking Space Personally’ in Barney, Warf and Santa, Arias (eds), The Spatial Turn: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stivale, Charles J. (1984) ‘The Literary Element in “Mille Plateaux”: The New Cartography of Deleuze and Guattari’, SubStance 13: 20–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stramignoni, Igor (2004) ‘Francesco’s Devilish Venus: Notations on the Matter of Legal Space’, California Western Law Review 41: 147–240.Google Scholar
Trigg, Dylan (2008) ‘Place Becomes the Law’, Griffith Law Review 17(2): 546–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warf, Barney and Arias, Santa (2009) (eds), The Spatial Turn: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weiss, Gail (2008) ‘Ambiguity’ in Rosalyn, Diprose and Jack, Reynolds (eds), Merleau-Ponty: Key Concepts. Stocksfield: Acumen.Google Scholar