Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:09:55.349Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Using detention to talk about the elephant in the room: the Global Compact for Migration and the significance of its neglect of the UN Migrant Workers Convention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2020

Mariette Grange
Affiliation:
Adviser to the Global Detention Project
Izabella Majcher*
Affiliation:
Senior Legal Officer at the European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE)
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: izabella.majcher@graduateinstitute.ch

Abstract

The paper discusses the (unsteady) evolution of multilateral processes on migration since the 1980s, with a focus on immigration detention as a growing response to migratory movements. It identifies distinct periods leading up to the Global Compact for Migration (GCM). The paper exposes double standards in the treatment of migration at the UN and beyond, connected with states’ view of migration as a toxic topic. While the GCM put the issue of migration back on the global agenda, the paper argues against the claim that the GCM is the first-ever inter-governmentally negotiated agreement covering all dimensions of international migration. This description better fits the 1990 Migrant Workers Convention. Furthermore, the paper illustrates how the GCM poses a threat to human rights protection in the area of migration: given its focus on co-operation and a state-led non-binding approach, it may overshadow existing international norms and widely endorsed standards monitored by UN bodies.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Americans for Immigrant Justice et al. (2016) U.S. human rights leadership and outcome document for UN High-Level Meeting on Refugees and Migrants. Available at https://www.humanrightsfirst.org/resource/letter-us-human-rights-leadership-and-outcome-document-un-high-level-meeting-refugees-and (accessed 24 September 2020).Google Scholar
AVL (2019) Moot Courts & Simulations. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
AVL (2020) Human Rights, Historic Archives. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Battistella, G (2009) Migration and human rights: the uneasy but essential relationship. In Cholewinski, R et al. (eds), Migration and Human Rights: The United Nations Convention on Migrant Workers’ Rights. Cambridge: CUP, 4769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böhning, R (1991) The ILO and the new UN Convention on Migrant Workers: the past and future. International Migration Review 4, 698709.Google Scholar
Cholewinski, R (1997) Migrant Workers in International Human Rights Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
CMW (2018) Draft General Comment No. 5 on Migrants’ Right to Liberty and Freedom from Arbitrary Detention Concept Note and Questionnaire. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.Google Scholar
Cornelisse, G (2010) Immigration Detention and Human Rights: Rethinking Territorial Sovereignty. Leiden: Nijhoff Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullen, M (2019) The IOM's new status and its role under the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration: pause for thoughts. EJIL Blog of the European Journal of International Law. Available at https://www.ejiltalk.org/the-ioms-new-status-and-its-role-under-the-global-compact-for-safe-orderly-and-regular-migration-pause-for-thought/ (accessed 24 September 2020).Google Scholar
Dauvergne, C (2004) Sovereignty, migration and the rule of law in global times. Modern Law Review 67, 588615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desmond, A (2017a) A vexed relationship: the ICRMW vis-à-vis the EU and its Member States. In Desmond, A (ed.), Shining New Light on the UN Migrant Workers Convention. Pretoria: PULP, 295–321.Google Scholar
Desmond, A (2017b) The continuing relevance of the UN ICRMW. In Desmond, A (ed.), Shining New Light on the UN Migrant Workers Convention. Pretoria: PULP, 122.Google Scholar
Ferris, E (2016) In Search of Commitments: The 2016 Refugee Summits. UNSW, Kaldor Centre for International Refugee Law, Policy Brief 3.Google Scholar
Franciscans International (2018) Despite the efforts, the Global Compact falls short of its promises. Available at https://franciscansinternational.org/news/news/despite-the-efforts-the-global-compact-falls-short-of-its-promises/?no_cache=1&L=4&tx_news_pi1%5Bcontroller%5D=News&tx_news_pi1%5Baction%5D=detail (accessed 24 September 2020).Google Scholar
GCIM (2005) Migration in an Interconnected World: New Directions for Action. Report of the Global Commission on International Migration. New York/Geneva: GCIM.Google Scholar
GFMD (2016) Report of the Ninth GFMD 2016 Bangladesh Chairmanship. Bangladesh: IOM.Google Scholar
GFMD (2019) About the GFMD. Available at https://gfmd.org/ (accessed 24 September 2020).Google Scholar
Goodwin-Gill, G (2019) A brief and somewhat sceptical perspective on the International Organization for Migration. Andrew & Renata Kaldor Centre for International Refugee Law, The University of New South Wales. Available at https://www.kaldorcentre.unsw.edu.au/publication/brief-and-somewhat-sceptical-perspective-international-organization-migration (accessed 24 September 2020).Google Scholar
Grange, M (2004) Regional migration consultative processes: where is civil society? Asian Migrant Yearbook 2002–2003, Asian Migrant Centre, Migrant Forum in Asia, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Grange, M (2006) Strengthening Protection of Migrant Workers and Their Families with International Human Rights Treaties: A Do-it-yourself Kit. Geneva: ICMC.Google Scholar
Grange, M (2017) The International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families and Immigration Detention. In Desmond, A (ed.), Shining New Light on the: UN Migrant Workers Convention. Pretoria: PULP, 72100.Google Scholar
Grange, M and d'Auchamp, M (2009) Role of civil society in campaigning for and using the ICRMW. In Cholewinski, R et al. (eds), Migration and Human Rights: The United Nations Convention on Migrant Workers’ Rights. Cambridge: CUP, 7099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grange, M and Majcher, I (2017) Immigration detention under international human rights law: the legal framework and the litmus test of human rights treaty bodies monitoring. In Flynn, M and Flynn, M (eds), Challenging Immigration Detention: Academics, Activists and Policy-makers. Cheltenham: Elgar, 265292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guild, E and Basaran, T (2019) GCM Indicators: Monitoring Implementation of the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration. Refugee Law Initiative. https://rli.blogs.sas.ac.uk/2019/02/14/gcm-indicators-monitoring-implementation-of-the-global-compact-for-safe-orderly-and-regular-migration/Google Scholar
Guild, E, Grant, S and Groenendijk, K (2017) IOM and the UN: Unfinished Business. Legal Studies Research Paper No. 255/2017. London: Queen Mary University of London, School of Law.Google Scholar
International Catholic Migration Commission (2001) An Index to Migration, Refugees and Forced Displacement Issues in Selected United Nations World Conferences and Summits – A Pilot Project (file with the authors), 18 December.Google Scholar
IOM (2017) Comparative Thematic Mapping of Global Migration Initiatives: Lessons learned towards a Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration. Geneva: IOM.Google Scholar
IOM (2018) Global Migration Indicators. Geneva: IOM.Google Scholar
IOM (2019) Global Compact for Migration. Available at https://www.iom.int/global-compact-migration (accessed 24 September 2020). Geneva: IOM.Google Scholar
Karp, P (2018) Australia refuses to sign UN migration pact, citing risks to turnbacks and detention, The Guardian. Available at https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/nov/21/australia-refuses-to-sign-un-migration-pact-citing-risks-to-turnbacks-and-detention (accessed 24 September 2020).Google Scholar
Lönnroth, J (1991) The International Convention on the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families in the context of international migration policies: an analysis of ten years of negotiation. International Migration Review 4, 710736.Google Scholar
Majcher, I (2018) GCM Commentary: Objective 21: Cooperate in Facilitating Safe and Dignified Return and Readmission, as Well as Sustainable Reintegration. Refugee Law Initiative. Available at https://rli.blogs.sas.ac.uk/2018/11/01/gcm-commentary-objective-21/ (accessed 24 September 2020).Google Scholar
Majcher, I (2019a) Immigration detention under the global compacts in light of the international legal framework governing immigration detention. International Migration 57, 91114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majcher, I (2019b) The European Union Returns Directive and Its Compatibility with International Human Rights Law: Analysis of Return Decision, Entry Ban, Detention, and Removal. Leiden: Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
McGregor, E (2020) Migration, the MDGs and SDGs: context and complexity. In Bastia, T and Skeldon, R (eds), Routledge Handbook on Migration and Development. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McVeigh, K (2018) UN states agree historic global deal to manage migration crisis, The Guardian. Available at https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2018/dec/10/un-states-agree-historic-global-deal-to-manage-refugee-crisis (accessed 24 September 2020).Google Scholar
Micinski, NR and Weiss, TG (2018) Global migration governance: beyond coordination and crises. In Capaldo, GZ (ed.), The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 2017. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Muntarbhorn, V (2019) The global compacts and the dilemma of children in immigration detention. International Journal of Refugee Law 30, 668673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nafziger, JAR and Bartel, BC (1991) The Migrant Workers Convention: its place in human rights law. International Migration Review 4, 771799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OHCHR (2018) Global Compact for Migration. Available at https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Migration/Pages/GlobalCompactforMigration.aspx (accessed 24 September 2020).Google Scholar
Pécoud, A (2017) The politics of the UN Migrant Workers Convention. In Desmond, A (ed.), Shining New Light on the UN Migrant Workers Convention. Pretoria: PULP, 24–44.Google Scholar
Pécoud, A and Grange, M (2018) Les Dilemmes de l'Organisation Internationale Pour Les Migrations, The Conversation. Available at http://theconversation.com/les-dilemmes-de-lorganisation-internationale-pour-les-migrations-99170 (accessed 24 September 2020).Google Scholar
Permanent Representatives of Mexico and Switzerland to the United Nations (2018) FAQs on the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration (GCM). Mexico/Bern: Permanent Representatives of Mexico and Switzerland to the United Nations.Google Scholar
Red Cross EU Office (2018) The Global Compact for Migration. Available at https://redcross.eu/latest-news/the-global-compact-for-migration (accessed 24 September 2020).Google Scholar
Sengupta, S (2016) Deadlocked over draft agreement on refugees and migrants, The New York Times. Available at https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/02/world/americas/un-united-nations-refugees-migrants.html?action=click&contentCollection=World&module=RelatedCoverage&region=Marginalia&pgtype=article (accessed 24 September 2020).Google Scholar
Sookrajowa, S and Pécoud, A (2019) United Nations Migrant Workers Convention. In Ratuva, S (ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Ethnicity. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan, 1813–1827.Google Scholar
Spagnolo, A (2019) ‘We are tidying up’: the Global Compact on Migration and its interaction with international human rights law. EJIL Talk. Available at https://www.ejiltalk.org/we-are-tidying-up-the-global-compact-on-migration-and-its-interaction-with-international-human-rights-law/ (accessed 24 September 2020).Google Scholar
Special Rapporteur on Torture (2015) Report of the Special Rapporteur on Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, Juan E. Méndez: Torture and Ill-Treatment of Children Deprived of Their Liberty. A/HRC/28/68.Google Scholar
SRHRM (2012) Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Human Rights of Migrants, François Crépeau: Detention of Migrants in an Irregular Situation. A/HRC/20/24.Google Scholar
Stefanelli, J (2018) GCM Commentary: Objective 13: Use Immigration Detention Only as a Measure of Last Resort and Work towards Alternatives. Refugee Law Initiative. Available at https://rli.blogs.sas.ac.uk/2018/09/27/gcm-commentary-objective-13/ (accessed 24 September 2020).Google Scholar
Torpey, L and Reale, D (2017) Time for a clear roadmap for states to end child immigration detention. Open Democracy. Available at https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/beyond-trafficking-and-slavery/time-for-clear-roadmap-for-states-to-end-child-immigratio/ (accessed 24 September 2020).Google Scholar
UN (2016) UN Summit for Refugees and Migrants 2016. Available at https://refugeesmigrants.un.org/summit (accessed 24 September 2020).Google Scholar
UN (2019a) Refugees and Migrants. Available at https://refugeesmigrants.un.org/ (accessed 24 September 2020).Google Scholar
UN (2019b) Terms of Reference for the UN Network on Migration.Google Scholar
UNDP (2004) Human Development Report 2004 – Cultural Liberty in Today's Diverse World. New York: UNDP.Google Scholar
UNDP (2009) Human Development Report 2009 – Overcoming Barriers: Human Mobility and Development. New York: UNDP.Google Scholar
UNDP (2016) Human Development Report 2016 – Human Development for Everyone. New York: UNDP.Google Scholar
UNFPA (2014) Programme of action adopted at the International Conference on Population and Development, Cairo, 5–13 September 1994 20th Anniversary Edition.Google Scholar
UNGA (1986) Report of the Open-ended Working Group on the Elaboration of an International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Their Families. A/C.3/41/3.Google Scholar
UNGA (1988) Body of Principles for the Protection of All Persons under Any Form of Detention or Imprisonment. A/RES/43/173.Google Scholar
UNGA (2015a) Draft Decision Submitted by the President of the General Assembly: High-level Plenary Meeting on Addressing Large Movements of Refugees and Migrants. A/70/L.34.Google Scholar
UNGA (2015b) High-level Plenary Meeting of the General Assembly on Addressing Large Movements of Refugees and Migrants. 70/539.Google Scholar
UNGA (2015c) United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners. A/RES/70/175.Google Scholar
UNGA (2016) New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants. A/RES/71/1.Google Scholar
UNGA (2019) Format and Organisational Aspects of the International Migration Review Forums. A/RES/73/326.Google Scholar
UNHCR (2017) UNHCR's Position Regarding the Detention of Refugee and Migrant Children in the Migration Context.Google Scholar
UNHCR (2018) Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Part II Global Compact on Refugees. A/73/12.Google Scholar
Universal Human Rights Index (UHRI) (2020) Advanced search on detention of migrants. Available at https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/search/annotations (accessed 24 September 2020).Google Scholar
UNSG (2016) In Safety and Dignity: Addressing Large Movements of Refugees and Migrants. A/70/59.Google Scholar
UNSG (2017) Making Migration Work for All. A/72/643.Google Scholar
WGAD (2011) Report of the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention. A/HRC/16/47.Google Scholar
WGAD (2018) Revised Deliberation No. 5 on Deprivation of Liberty of Migrants. A/HRC/39/45.Google Scholar
Wintour, P (2017) Donald Trump pulls US out of UN global compact on migration, The Guardian. Available at https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/dec/03/donald-trump-pulls-us-out-of-un-global-compact-on-migration (accessed 24 September 2020).Google Scholar