The Internet Solution
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2019
One of the major weaknesses of libraries in developing countries is their scarcity of foreign and international legal collections. In desperate need for reliable and up-to-date foreign jurisdiction resources, these libraries try to fill the gap with ad-hoc solutions. New York University's experiences in offering assistance to some of them clearly show that obtaining out-of-date books from “generous donations”, importing short-term visiting “brains” or buying computers (which are used as furniture covered with elegant red velvet) doesn't solve the problem. On the contrary, these stop-gaps feed frustration.
1 This article does not define in detail all the concepts and components of Internet research. For a basic introduction to the Internet see the literature published on this topic.Google Scholar
2 In the United States law librarians are generally experts in content (law, social sciences, languages) as well as organization, acquisition, and service of information. They are expected to be able to analyze inquiries to determine appropriate sources and to maintain peer networks to facilitate acquisitions of even unpublished materials. Frequently, they have faculty status that recognizes the importance of their contributions to the research enterprise and empowers them to negotiate for information on behalf of the institutions. In addition to finding information directly, they also train end users and other information professionals to be self-sufficient. In Europe these roles may be performed by junior professors or doctorates in specialized research centers.Google Scholar
3 The terms legal information specialist, law librarian and legal researcher are used in this article interchangeably.Google Scholar
4 Ruth A. Fraley. Renaissance in Law Librarianship – Another Perspective. TOWARD A RENAISSANCE IN LAW LIBRARIANSHIP. American Association of Law Libraries: West Information Publishing Group, 103 (1997).Google Scholar
5 Nancy Lambert. A new patent search tool for the Internet. 19 DATABASE 4, 56 (1996).Google Scholar
6 Martin Courtois O. Tools for Web searching: an update. 20 ONLINE 3, 29 (1996).Google Scholar
7 Greg R. Notess. The Internet in 1996. 20 DATABASE 5, 75–80 (1996).Google Scholar
8 Gregory F. Pratt, Patrick Flannery, Cassandra L.D. Perkins. Guidelines for Internet resource selection. 57 C&RL NEWS 3, 134 (1996).Google Scholar