Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:37:48.703Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Legal Information on the Web: the Case of Italy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2019

Ginevra Peruginelli
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Accessing legal information is a primary requirement for a variety of communities: ordinary citizens, scholars, and professionals. The dissemination of legal information contributes to the rule of law and to the overall ideals of democracy in a number of ways. Many are the benefits of accessing legal information, such as the awareness of the applicable rule of law, the creation of conditions necessary to the equality and fairness of a legal system, while improving the functioning of democratic institutions, the development and improvement of social and economic conditions.

Type
Articles
Information
International Journal of Legal Information , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , Summer 2006 , pp. 327 - 357
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 by the International Association of Law Libraries 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 ITTIG web site is visible at: http://www.ittig.cnr.it Google Scholar

2 http://gazzette.comune.jesi.an.it Google Scholar

3 Information on NIR Project are available on http://www.nir.it/ Google Scholar

4 Ciampi C. et al. 2000. “Introduzione al progetto Norme in rete.” Informatica e diritto. 1:1–200 Google Scholar

5 Cherubini M. 2002. “Verso l'armonizzazione dei portali pubblici: il Portale nazionale Italia.gov.it e Norme in Rete”. Informatica e diritto. 1:47–110.Google Scholar

6 Spinosa P. 2001. “Assegnazione dei nomi uniformi ai documenti giuridici”. Informatica e diritto. 1: 233–264.Google Scholar

7 Information is available at http://www.giustizia.it/cassazione/infoced.htm Google Scholar

8 http://www.italgiure.giustizia.it.Google Scholar

9 Peruginelli G. 2002. “L'accesso alla dottrina giuridica: strumenti e linee di sviluppo in rete.” Informatica e diritto. 1:111–176.Google Scholar

10 Catalogo delle pubblicazioni periodiche delle biblioteche aderenti a ESSPER. http://www.biblio.liuc.it:8080/biblio/essper/period.htmGoogle Scholar

11 The most important and highly used services are Lexis-Nexis and Westlaw, which are world wide, on charge accessible databases containing TOCs, abstracts, and digital texts, whose size is growing progressively.Google Scholar

12 DoGi is accessible on the web, partially free of charge, and it represents, despite some deficiencies in coverage and currency, the most important source of articles of Italian legal printed periodicals. http://nir.ittig.cnr.it/dogiswish/Index.htm Google Scholar

13 http://nir.ittig.cnr.it/dogiswish/Index.htm.Google Scholar

14 http://www.infoleges.it.Google Scholar

15 Francesconi E., Peruginelli G. 2003 “Integration between structured repositories and web documents.” Proceedings of the DC Conference 2003. 99–107.Google Scholar

16 OAI – The Open Archives Initative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting, http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/openarchivesprotocol.htm Google Scholar

17 Francesconi E., Peruginelli G. 2005. “Retrieval of Italian legal literature: a case of semantic search using legal vocabulary.” Proceedings of the DC Conference.Google Scholar

18 Jacobson T., Fusani D. 1992. “Computer, System, and Subject Knowledge in novice searching of a full-text, multifiles database.” Library & Information Science Research. 4(1):97–106.Google Scholar

19 See, for example, Metadata: UKOLN software tools. http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/software-tools/ Google Scholar

20 Francesconi E, Peruginelli G. 2004. “Opening the legal literature Portal to multilingual access.” Proceedings of the DC Conference 2004. 100–107.Google Scholar

21 J. Kerby. 1982. “La traduction juridique, un cas d'espèce, in Jean Claude Gémar (Ed.)”. Langage du droit et traduction, Essais de jurilinguistique Google Scholar

22 Peters C., Picchi E. 1997 “Across languages, across cultures: issues in multilinguality and digital libraries.” D-Lib Magazine, May. Available on http://www.dlib.org/dlib/may97/peters/05peters.html.Google Scholar

23 Mayfield J., McNamee P. 2002. “Three principles to guide CLIR research”. Available on http://ucdata.berkeley.edu/sigir-2002/sigir2002CLIR-18-mayfield.pdf.Google Scholar

24 Fluhr C. 1996. “Multilingual Information Retrieval.” Survey of the State of the Art in Human Language Technology., Available on http://cslu.cse.ogi.edu/HLTsurvey/ch8node7.html.Google Scholar

25 Oard W. D. 1997. “Alternative approaches for Cross-Language Text Retrieval.” Available on http://www.ee.umd.edu/medlab/filter/sss/papers/oard/paper.html.Google Scholar

26 Van Laer C.J.P. 1998. “The applicability of comparative concepts.” Electronic Journal of Comparative Law, 2(2).Google Scholar

27 Sacco R., 1998. “Droit et langue.” Rapports italiens au XV Congrès international de droit comparé.Google Scholar

28 However no modem legal system is a “pure” representation of any type of system; all jurisdictions today represent mixed systems, to some extent.Google Scholar

29 Tunkel V. 1997 “Law finding for lawyers.” The Law Librarian, 28(2):8–10; Leckie G., Pettigrew K. E., and Sylvain C. 1996. “Modelling the information seeking of professionals: a general model derived from research on engineers, healthcare professionals and lawyers.” Library quarterly. 66:161–193; Oppenheim C. 2001. “Judged to be lacking.” Information world review. 169:10.Google Scholar

30 Taddei Elmi G. 2003. “Corso di informatica giuridica”. Napoli, Edizioni giuridiche Simone.Google Scholar