Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:43:04.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cause analysis for unsatisfactory results in proficiencytesting activities: a case study of Brazilian calibration laboratories accredited underISO/IEC 17025:2005⋆

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2013

M.A.F. Silva ,
M.H. Moura ,
R. Nogueira  and
S.R.R. Costa
M.A.F. Silva
Affiliation:
National Institute of Metrology, Quality and Technology (Inmetro), General Coordination for Accreditation (Cgcre), Laboratory Accreditation Division (Dicla), Xerém 25250-020, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
M.H. Moura
Affiliation:
National Institute of Metrology, Quality and Technology (Inmetro), General Coordination for Accreditation (Cgcre), Laboratory Accreditation Division (Dicla), Xerém 25250-020, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
R. Nogueira*
Affiliation:
National Institute of Metrology, Quality and Technology (Inmetro), General Coordination for Accreditation (Cgcre), Laboratory Accreditation Division (Dicla), Xerém 25250-020, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
S.R.R. Costa
Affiliation:
Fluminense Federal University; Technology, Management and Environment Laboratory, Niterói 24220-900, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
*
⋆⋆ Correspondence:rnogueira@inmetro.gov.br
Get access

Abstract

This work presents the results of a survey carried out among Brazilian calibrationlaboratories accredited under ISO/IEC 17025:2005 with the objective to identify how theselaboratories investigate the root causes of unsatisfactory results in proficiency testing.The survey was coordinated by the Brazilian accreditation body, the General Coordinationfor Accreditation (Cgcre), of the Institute of Metrology, Quality and Technology(Inmetro).

Keywords

Laboratory accreditationISO/IEC 17025:2005proficiency testingmeasurement auditscorrective action
Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , 2013 , pp. 87 - 95
Copyright
© EDP Sciences 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

⋆

Supplementary material is available in electronic form at www.metrology-journal.org

References

ISO/IEC 17025, General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories (ISO, Geneva, 2005)
ISO/IEC 17043, Conformity Assessment, General Requirements for Proficiency Testing (ISO, Geneva, 2010)
QUAM:2012.P1, Eurachem/Citac Guide CG 4, Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement, 3rd edn. (Eurachem/Citac working group, London, 2012)
Bruce, S., Strouse, G.F., Proficiency testing for achieving accreditation in thermometry, Int. J. Thermophys. 30, 351 (2009) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belli, M. et al., Proficiency testing in analytical chemistry, microbiology and laboratory medicine: working discussions on current practice and future directions, Accred. Qual. Assur. 14, 507 (2009) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brookman, B. et al., Proficiency testing in analytical chemistry, microbiology and laboratory medicine: working discussions on current practice and future directions, Accred. Qual. Assur. 17, 445 (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ILAC-P13:10/2010, Application of ISO/IEC 17011 for the Accreditation of Proficiency Testing Providers (ILAC, Silverwater, Australia, 2010), https://www.ilac.org/documents/ILAC_P13_10-2010.pdf
IAF/ILAC-A2:01/2013, Multi-Lateral Mutual Recognition Arrangements: Requirements and Procedures for Evaluation of a Single Accreditation Body (ILAC, Silverwater, Australia, 2013), http://www.ilac.org/documents/IAF-ILAC_A2_01_2013.pdf
J.C. Gust, A discussion of stability and homogeneity issues in proficiency testing for calibration laboratories (ILAC, Vienna, 2007), https://www.ilac.org/documents/PTCG_07_8a.pdf
ISO 13528, Statistical Methods for Use in Proficiency Testing by Interlaboratory Comparisons (ISO, Geneva, 2005)
EA-4/02, Expression of the Uncertainty of Measurement in Calibration (European co-operation for Accreditation of Laboratories, Paris, 1999), http://www.european-accreditation.org/publication/ea-4-02-m
ISO/IEC 17011, Conformity Assessment, General Requirements for Accreditation Bodies Accrediting Conformity Assessment Bodies (ISO, Geneva, 2004)
ILAC-P9:11/2010, ILAC Policy for Participation in Proficiency Testing Activities (ILAC, Silverwater, Australia, 2010), http://www.ilac.org/documents/ILAC_P9_11_2010.pdf
Ellison, S.R.L., Hardcastle, W.A., Causes of error in analytical chemistry: results of a web-based survey of proficiency testing participants, Accred. Qual. Assur. 17, 453 (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar