Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T19:37:19.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A compact low-phase noise oscillator with superior harmonic suppression characteristics based on novel nested split-ring resonator (NSRR)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2015

Yong Liu*
Affiliation:
School of Electronic Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan 611731, China
Neng Xie
Affiliation:
School of Electronic Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan 611731, China
Xiaohong Tang
Affiliation:
School of Electronic Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan 611731, China
Fei Xiao
Affiliation:
School of Electronic Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan 611731, China
*
Corresponding author: Y. Liu Email: liuyong2323@163.com

Abstract

In this paper, a novel microwave oscillator incorporating miniaturized nested split-ring resonators is proposed. The high-quality (Q) factor and wide spurious-free band of the NSRR contribute to low-phase noise and high-harmonic suppression of the proposed oscillator circuits. In addition, the NSRR is featured by compact size of 0.12λg × 0.12λg, where λg is the guided wavelength of resonance frequency. The fabricated 2.4 GHz oscillator has an output power of 11.7 dBm with 5 V DC supply and 10 mA current consumption. The second harmonic suppression is −45.49 dBc, the phase noise is −110 dBc/Hz @100 kHz, and the DC–RF conversion efficiency is measured as 30%.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Jimenez-Martin, J.L.; Gonzalez-Posadas, V.; Parra-Cerrada, A.; Segovia-Vargas, D.: Transpose return relation method for designing low noise oscillators. Prog. Electromagn. Res., 127 (2012), 297318.Google Scholar
[2] Pendry, J.B.; Holden, A.J.; Robbins, D.J.; Stewart, W.J.: Magnetism from conductors and enhanced nonlinear phenomena. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 47 (1999), 20752084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Smith, D.R.; Padilla, W.J.; Vier, D.C.; Nemat-Nasser, S.C.; Schultz, S.: Composite medium with simultaneously negative permeability and permittivity. Phys. Rev. Lett., 84 (2000), 41844187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[4] Baena, J.D.; Bonache, J.; Martin, F.; Sillero, R.M.; Falcone, F.; Lopetegi, T.: Equivalent-circuit models for split-ring resonators and complementary split-ring resonators coupled to planar transmission lines. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 53 (2005), 14511461.Google Scholar
[5] Montero-de-Paz, J.; Ugarte-Munoz, E.; Hettaiz-Martinez, F.J.: Multifrequency self -diplexed single patch antennas loaded with split ring resonators. Prog. Electromagn. Res., 113 (2011), 4766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Zhang, F.; Zhao, Q.; Sun, J.; Zhou, J.; Lippens, D.: Coupling effect of split ring resonator and its mirror image. Prog. Electromagn. Res., 124 (2012), 233247.Google Scholar
[7] Carbonell, J.; Lheurette, E.; Lippens, D.: From rejection to transmission with stacked arrays of split ring resonators. Prog. Electromagn. Res., 112 (2011), 215224.Google Scholar
[8] Nornikman, H.; Ahmad, B.H.; Abdul Aziz, M.Z.A.; Malek, F.; Imran, H.; Othman, A.R.: Study and simulation of an edge couple split ring resonator (Ec-Srr) on truncated pyramidal microwave absorber. Prog. Electromagn. Res., 127 (2012), 319334.Google Scholar
[9] Kim, D.-O.; Jo, N.-I.; Jang, H.-A.; Kim, C.-Y.: Design of the ultrawideband antenna with a quadruple-band rejection characteristics using a combination of the complementary split ring resonators. Prog. Electromagn. Res., 112 (2011), 93107.Google Scholar
[10] Melik, R.; Unal, E.; Perkgoz, N.K.; Santoni, B.; Kamstock, D.; Puttlitz, C.; Demir, H.V.: Nested metamaterials for wireless strain sensing. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 16 (2010), 450458.Google Scholar
[11] Liu, Y.; Tang, X.H.; Zhang, Z.X.; Huang, X.L.: Novel nested split-ring-resonator (SRR) for compact filter application. Prog. Electromagn. Res., 136 (2013), 765773.Google Scholar
[12] Kajfez, D.; Wheless, W.P.: Invariant definitions of the unloaded Q factor. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 34 (2003), 840841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] Naji, A.; Warr, P.: Independence of the unloaded Q of a planar electromagnetic resonator from its shape. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 60 (2012), 23702377.Google Scholar
[14] Kakhki, M.A.; Neshati, M.H.: Experimental Investigation of a Dual Band-Reject Filter Using C-Shaped DGS with Improved Q-factor, in 2010 Fifth Int. Symp. on Telecommunications (IST'2010), Tehran, Iran, 2010.Google Scholar
[15] Hajimiri, A.; Lee, T.H.: The Design of Low Noise Oscillator, Kluwer, Norwell, MA, 1999.Google Scholar
[16] Li, Z.B.; Kenneth, K. O: A low-phase noise and low-power multiband CMOS voltage-controlled oscillator. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, 40 (2005), 12961302.Google Scholar
[17] Wang, X.Y.; Fard, A.; Andreani, P.: Phase noise analysis and design of a 3-GHz bipolar differential colpitts VCO, in Proceedings of ESSCIRC 2005: 31st European Solid-State Circuits Conf., Grenoble, France, 2005.Google Scholar
[18] Maharjan, R.K.; Kim, N.Y.: InGaAs/GaAs HBT based MMIC differential VCO for s-band satellite communication applications, in IEEE Int. Symp. on Microwave, Antenna Propagation and EMC Technologies for Wireless Communications, Beijing, China, 2009.Google Scholar
[19] Mendes, L.; Vaz, J.C.; Rosario, M.J.: A low power low phase noise wide switched tuned band LC VCO for S band applications, in Proc. of 2008 Asia Pacific Microwave Conf., Hong Kong, China, 2008.Google Scholar