Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:22:19.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

CPW-fed printed tapered slot antenna loaded by a wideband stacked artificial magnetic conductor with a progressed performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2022

Hossein Malekpoor*
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Arak University, Arak, 38156-8-8349, Iran
Mehdi Hamidkhani
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Dolatabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
*
Author for correspondence: Hossein Malekpoor, E-mail: h-malekpoor@araku.ac.ir
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A low profile printed slot antenna (PSA) backed by broadband stacked artificial magnetic conductor (AMC) is introduced in this study. First, a suggested PSA with the radiating tapered slots excited by coplanar-waveguide (CPW) is used to expand the bandwidth in the measured range of 9.05–10.95 GHz (S11 ≤ −10 dB). Then, the suggested stacked AMC surface as the ground plane of the antenna is inserted into the PSA to gain improved radiation efficiency. The realized result from the PSA with the 11 × 17 stacked AMC array exhibits −10 dB measured impedance bandwidth from 6.97 to 13.34 GHz (62.73%). The suggested PSA with AMC compared to the PSA without AMC exhibits a size reduction of 52%, enhanced bandwidth of almost 44%, and excellent impedance matching with uni-directional radiation patterns. The novel AMC unit cell is realized based on the recognized method of stacked elements. The stacked AMC design operates at 10.63 GHz with an AMC bandwidth of 8–12.84 GHz (45.8%) for X-band operation. Besides, by introducing a specific method based on the reflection results of the equivalent waveguide feed, the number of AMC unit cells is investigated to obtain an optimal AMC array. In this approach, an equivalent waveguide feed corresponding to the center operating frequency is considered to choose the number of AMC array reflector.

Type
Metamaterials and Photonic Bandgap Structures
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the European Microwave Association

Introduction

In most studies, electromagnetic band gap (EBG) structures have been employed in many wireless networks and a wide variety of electromagnetic equipment due to the unique and remarkable characteristics. They exclude the surface wave's propagation in a determined frequency gap. The EBG structures are studied and recognized as the photonic band gap (PBG) structures with periodic arrangements [Reference Wang, Sun, Yang and Zhang1Reference Hadarig, de Cos, Á lvarez and Heras4]. As is known, the artificial magnetic conductor (AMC) structures introduce a privilege like a perfect magnetic conductor (PMC) with in-phase reflection response entire certain range. Based on this, multiple low-profile antennas and mode prevention designs are applied AMCs as diverse surfaces to augment the distinguishing features [Reference Malekpoor5Reference Barth and Iyer10]. The results presented in [Reference Nashaat, Elsadek, Abdallah, Iskander and Hennawy9] show a broadband patch array by loading diverse EBG-AMCs into the ground plane. Also, a miniaturized uni-planar metamaterial-based EBG for parallel-plate mode prevention of the switching noise in digital circuits is described in [Reference Barth and Iyer10].

The uses of AMC periodic surfaces in distinct combinations are provided to show better efficiency [Reference Rajagopal, Chennakesavan, Subburaj, Srinivasan and Varadhan7, Reference Sievenpiper, Zhang, Broas, Alex́opolous and Yablonovitch11Reference Malekpoor and Hamidkhani17]. Among these works, a mushroom-shaped AMC structure as a beneficial approach is usually applied for diverse arrangements to achieve the low profile structures with a higher efficiency [Reference Sievenpiper, Zhang, Broas, Alex́opolous and Yablonovitch11]. In this method, used vias in periodic arrangements cannot create an easy accomplishment in the printed circuits and devices due to the drilled holes in a substrate. In the recent work, an EBG mushroom surface with a dual-layer is reported to attain a size reduction of more than 60% for multiple patch microstrip antennas [Reference Ghosh, Tran and Ngoc15]. This study is designed to present diverse two and four-element patch antennas at 2.5 GHz. It is noted that a narrow AMC bandwidth in designing broadband microwave technologies and antennas is a drastic drawback [Reference Zhu, Li, Liao and Xue18]. Therefore, there are few types of research for working on broadening the bandwidth of AMC structures [Reference Ghosh, Kumar, Sen and Das19Reference Hadarig, de Cos and Heras22]. Based on the frequency selective surface (FSS), an AMC design for RFID applications is proposed in [Reference de Cos, Álvarez and Heras21]. In [Reference Hadarig, de Cos and Heras22], a bandwidth of 4.4% at the resonance of 6.2 GHz is demonstrated to acquire a compact AMC unit cell with relatively acceptable angular stability.

In recent years, by increasing the extension of wireless networks and satellite applications, microstrip patch antennas have attracted a great deal of attention owing to their charming specifications, like a low profile structure, light weight and simple implementation. Although a limited impedance bandwidth of the introduced antennas is accounted a notable issue in most studies. Diverse approaches in previous works have been developed to ameliorate the bandwidth of microstrip antennas [Reference Malekpoor and Hamidkhani23Reference Malekpoor and Jam25]. Recently, by ameliorating the variety of integrated circuit technologies, the broadband AMC surfaces in the low profile antennas and microwave devices are impressively utilized with improved features [Reference Xu and Deng26Reference Alibakhshikenari, Virdee, See, Abd-Alhameed, Ali, Falcone and Limiti36]. In [Reference Feng, Zhai, Xi, Yang, Zhang and Yang28], a low profile circular polarized antenna with the AMC surfaces like a reflector plate is reported to provide a broadband antenna with a higher gain. This antenna with AMC includes the impedance bandwidth from 1.19 to 2.37 GHz (66.3%) with the axial ratio AR bandwidth of 1.25–1.97 GHz (44.7%).

The present study reports a detailed discussion of the new broadband AMC design for applying at the suggested PSA. At first, a stacked AMC is introduced to resonate at 10.63 GHz (8–12.84 GHz) for broadband application. In the following, a low profile broadband PSA backed by the stacked AMC surface is introduced. For this purpose, two radiating tapered slots fed by CPW broaden the impedance bandwidth in X-band. Then, a broadband 11 × 17 stacked AMC reflector is developed under the antenna to obtain the ameliorated radiation efficiency. It presents the measured −10 dB impedance bandwidth in 6.97–13.34 GHz with the measured bandwidth of 62.73%. Also, the proper impedance matching and broad bandwidth with excellent compactness are achieved. Meanwhile, the performance of the AMC surface inserted in PSA is studied by introducing an equivalent waveguide feed in the position of the one half-wavelength of the radiating slot. Based on the reflection results of the equivalent waveguide feed, the optimal AMC array is determined.

Suggested printed slot antenna with broadband AMC surface

3D view and top view of suggested PSA backed by stacked AMC surface is drawn in Fig. 1. Two radiating slots with tapered slots are placed on FR4 substrate with 1.6 mm thickness. The 11 × 17 periodic patch of AMC surface is placed underneath the ground plane which is made from substrate thicknesses (FR4) of h1, h2, and h3 to couple the energy to the top layer of PSA. The dimensions of width and length of slots with tapered slots are 21 mm, and they etch on the substrate by sizes of 52 × 78 mm2. The CPW feeding system of PSA for 50-Ω input impedance is utilized. The main design parameters select as thickness h1 = h3 = 0.9 mm, h2 = 0.84 mm and h4 = 1.6 mm, εr = 4.4 and tanδ = 0.02 for FR4 substrates. A 50-Ω CPW feed is employed with the width of the strip 3 mm and the width of the slot 0.3 mm to provide the optimum impedance matching. Also, the value of Lcpw = 23 mm for CPW length is optimized. The arrangement of the 11 × 17 AMC periodic ground plane is developed below the PSA as the reactive coupling to conclude a broader bandwidth.

Fig. 1. Structure of the suggested PSA backed by the broadband stacked AMC reflector.

The suggested antenna excites by a 50-Ohm SMA connector from the center of the structure. The parametric studies are employed to determine the optimum dimensions and slots' length. The sizes of the suggested structure with AMC are listed in Table 1. The Images of the fabricated cases of the PSA backed by the stacked AMC reflector are shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. (a) Equivalent circuit for simple patch (b) Equivalent circuit for PSA with tapered slots.

Table 1. Sizes of suggested PSA backed by the AMC

The proposed PSA is introduced based on tapered slots for achieving different resonances [Reference Hadarig, de Cos, Á lvarez and Heras4]. The length, width and position of slots into the tapered slot patch result in a broad bandwidth. By incorporating two slots into the patches with tapered shapes, various resonances occur and thus the impedance bandwidth can be broadened.

The conventional microstrip patch antenna is modeled as a simple resonant circuit L1C1, as seen in Fig. 2(a) with the presented lumped elements [Reference Malekpoor and Jam3]:

(1)$$C_1 = \displaystyle{{\varepsilon _e\varepsilon _0L_eW} \over {2h}}\cos ^{{-}2}( \displaystyle{{\pi y_0} \over L}) $$
(2)$$L_1 = \displaystyle{1 \over {{( 2\pi f_r) }^2C_1}}$$
(3)$$R_1 = \displaystyle{Q \over {\omega C_1}}$$
(4)$$Q = \displaystyle{{c\sqrt {\varepsilon _e} } \over {4f_rh}}$$

where y0, Le, fr, h and ɛe are the distance of feed point from the edge, the effective length of the patch, the frequency of operating band and substrate characteristics, respectively. When two slots incorporate into the patch as a taper, an additional series inductance ΔL and an additional capacitance ΔC can be modelled as shown in Fig. 2(b). Thus, different inductive and capacitive couplings in the proposed PSA design result in a wide impedance bandwidth with multiple resonances.

On the basis of the transmission line model for the rectangular radiating patch, the basic width (W) and length (L) of the patch at the resonant frequency are determined using equations (5)–(8) [Reference Malekpoor and Jam25]:

(5)$$W = \displaystyle{{\lambda _0} \over {2\sqrt {\displaystyle{{\varepsilon _r + 1} \over 2}} }}$$
(6)$$L = \displaystyle{c \over {2f_0\sqrt {\varepsilon _{eff}} }}-2\Delta L$$
(7)$$\varepsilon _{eff} = \displaystyle{{\varepsilon _r + 1} \over 2} + \displaystyle{{\varepsilon _r-1} \over 2}\left({\displaystyle{1 \over {\sqrt {1 + 12\displaystyle{h \over W}} }}} \right)$$
(8)$$\Delta L = 0.412h\left({\displaystyle{{( {\varepsilon_{eff} + 0.3} ) \left({\displaystyle{W \over h} + 0.264} \right)} \over {( {\varepsilon_{eff}-0.258} ) \left({\displaystyle{W \over h} + 0.813} \right)}}} \right)$$

Where, εeff, h and ΔL are effective permittivity coefficient, thickness and additional length due to fringing fields, respectively. Similarly, the basic width and length of a printed microstrip dipole antenna are designed based on equations (5)–(8) for the determined operating frequency at X-band. In this case, dielectric constant substrate, εr = 4.4 is considered. The optimum sizes of the proposed PSA such as different lengths and the total height of the patch are optimized by a full-wave simulator with the parametric study.

The arrangement of the 11 × 17 AMC periodic ground plane is developed below the PDA as the reactive coupling to conclude a broader bandwidth and enhancement of radiation properties. The parametric studies are employed in the full-wave simulator to determine the optimum dimensions and arms' length.

Figure 3 illustrates the structure of the suggested stacked AMC unit cell. This design is obtained by using square stacked patches with various sizes and air gap. The applied technique of the stacked patches is recognized as a known approach to enhance the bandwidth such as microstrip patch antennas [Reference Malekpoor and Hamidkhani23, Reference Malekpoor and Hamidkhani24]. By applying this approach the diverse design factors are achieved to gain an optimized broadband structure. In the suggested stacked AMC the bandwidth improvement can be tuned by the diverse components like the air gap's height, the thickness of the substrates and dimensions of two patches. The sizes of the various patches choose 3.3 and 1.9 mm and they are printed on the ground surface with the dimensions of 4.4 × 4.4 mm2. The finalized amounts of the layer's heights are considered to h1 = h3 = 0.9 mm and h2 = 0.84 mm to gain an optimum design with the FR4 substrates of εr1 = εr2 = 4.4.

Fig. 3. Images of fabricated cases of the PSA backed by the stacked AMC reflector.

The electrical and structural specifications of the AMC are the main factors on obtaining the enhanced bandwidth. The structural specification of the broad AMC bandwidth acquires from the reactance couplings for sizes and parasitic patches. The optimum AMC bandwidth is gained by choosing the suitable electrical specification as h and εr. Based on this, the angular stability should remain without variation for broadband applications.

The mushroom-type EBG structure is formed by a via-loaded metal patch which can be characterized by an equivalent parallel LC resonator with a resonant frequency fr = 1/(2π√LC). The inductance L is obtained by the current path between the patch surface and ground plane through via. Besides, the capacitance C represents the gap effect between two adjacent patches (see Fig. 4(b)). The values of LC resonator and the frequency band gap in terms of the EBG parameters can be determined by the following formulas [Reference Sievenpiper, Zhang, Broas, Alex́opolous and Yablonovitch11]:

(9)$$C = \displaystyle{{W_{ebg}\varepsilon _0( 1 + \varepsilon _r) } \over \pi }\cosh ^{{-}1}\left({\displaystyle{{2W_{ebg} + g} \over g}} \right)$$
(10)$$L = \mu _0h$$
(11)$$BW = \displaystyle{1 \over \eta }\sqrt {\displaystyle{L \over C}} $$

where, ɛ0, μ0, Webg, and g are the permittivity and permeability of free space, patch width and the gap between unit cells respectively. Also, η is the free space impedance which is 120π.

Fig. 4. (a) Structure of suggested stacked design and simulation box by using Floquet theory (b) equivalent circuit model.

The electromagnetic properties of the suggested AMC are analyzed based on the finite element method (FEM) for periodic arrangements. As shown in Fig. 4(a), an infinite model is fulfilled with a periodic boundary condition (PBC) at the surrounding faces. For this purpose, different scan angles of incident waves (θ) are performed to recognize a wideband performance with angular stability for the reflection phase (see Fig. 4(a)) at the operating band. Moreover, the infinite model by applying the Floquet port helps to determine the operational bandwidth of AMC at a given ± 90° reflection phase.

According to Fig. 5, the flow chart of the design process is introduced in the different steps. It shows the comprehensive model to attain an optimum proposed design for wideband performance.

Fig. 5. Flow chart of the design process for the proposed structure.

Experimental and simulation results

An investigation of reflection responses of the periodic AMC is discussed in this section. Also, the printed slot antenna backed by the stacked AMC surface is tested to achieve low profile broadband antenna.

Infinite AMC unit cell with simulation results

The finite element method based on the Floquet theory is utilized in Ansoft High-Frequency Structure Simulator (HFSS) to simulate the AMC designs. Figure 6 plots the reflection phase of the suggested AMC by radiating the perpendicular TE/TM waves. The frequency range for reflection phases between +90° and −90° is ordinarily considered as an AMC operation bandwidth [Reference Sievenpiper, Zhang, Broas, Alex́opolous and Yablonovitch11]:

(12)$${\rm B}{\rm W}_{{\rm AMC}}( \% ) = [ {( {\,f_{up}-f_{lo}} ) /f_c} ] \times 100$$

where, fup is the frequency at which the reflection phase equals −90°, flo is the frequency at which the reflection phase equals +90°, and fc is the center frequency where the reflection phase equals 0̊.

Fig. 6. Reflection phase of TE/TM responses of stacked AMC for indirect incident waves in φ = 0̊ and 90°.

The simulated result of 8–12.84 GHz (45.8%) for normal TE/TM waves is provided. This AMC resonates at resonances of 10.63 GHz. As compared to the known researches [Reference Sievenpiper, Zhang, Broas, Alex́opolous and Yablonovitch11, Reference Ghosh, Kumar, Sen and Das19Reference Hadarig, de Cos and Heras22], the suggested AMC expresses the acceptable characteristics. It indicates the symmetric unit cell design with the same response for TE/TM waves, considerably broader bandwidth and tuning ability of the significant factors to gain diverse outputs for broadband application. Figure 6 plots the reflection phases of the stacked AMC for diverse inclined incident waves (θ) from 0̊ to 45̊ in two polarization angles of φ = 0̊ and 90°. A good agreement between the outcomes of TE and TM waves is identified. Thus, it can be concluded that the stacked AMC design covers X-band for wideband operation.

Measurement and simulation results of printed slot antenna loaded with AMC surface

The measured and simulated S-parameters of the suggested PSA design without AMC are illustrated in Fig. 7. The PSA without AMC surface includes the measurement range of 9.05–10.95 GHz (19%) for S 11 < −10 dB. As seen from Fig. 8, the suggested antenna with the stacked AMC reflector indicates the −10 dB measured bandwidth of 62.73% in 6.97–13.34 GHz. It is concluded that the PSA with the 11 × 17 AMC reflector presents the bandwidth enhancement of almost 44% versus the PSA without the AMC reflector. On the other hand, the decrease in frequency leads to suitable miniaturization.

Fig. 7. Measurement and simulation results of S-parameters of the suggested PSA without AMC.

Fig. 8. Measurement and simulation results of S-parameters of the suggested PSA with stacked AMC.

The total dimensions of the PSA without AMC reflector are 1.53, 2.43 and 0.048 λL, respectively (λL is the wavelength at the lower frequency). Whereas, the total dimensions of the PSA with the stacked AMC surface are 1.163, 1.88 and 0.105 λL, respectively. It is clear that by utilizing AMC the operating frequency of the antenna reduce to the lower frequencies and consequently, a compact antenna with the reduced size is achieved. Thus, by introducing the stacked AMC reflector in the suggested PSA size reduction of 52% gains compared with the PSA without the AMC. As an interesting note, at the PSA with the AMC reflector an impedance matching of almost −40 dB occurs over the obtained bandwidth. The suggested PSA with the AMC reflector in comparison with the PSA without AMC has excellent matching.

Figure 9 plots the surface current density on the patch of the printed antenna and AMC surfaces at various resonant frequencies. As seen from Fig. 9(a) at the lower resonance of 7.25 GHz of the suggested design with stacked AMC, a current distribution dominates on the CPW feed line and the sections of the AMC unit cells that are located under the CPW feed line. It is obtained that in Fig. 9(b) at the higher resonance of 11.62 GHz, the current density distributes on most unit cells of the AMC and around the tapered slots.

Fig. 9. Surface current density on the patch of the proposed antenna with stacked AMC at: (a) 7.25 (b) 11.62 GHz.

The measurement and simulation results of radiation patterns in the xz-plane and yz-plane for the suggested PSA with the stacked AMC reflector are plotted in Fig. 10. It is well found out that suitable accordance of the results is appointed. Simultaneously, the suggested design presents acceptable unidirectional radiation patterns. The maximum gain of the suggested PSA with stacked AMC surface within the operational bandwidth is 8.95 dBi, as seen in Fig. 11. Thus, the gain of the structure is impressively increased over obtained impedance bandwidth compared to the antenna without AMC.

Fig. 10. Measurement and simulation results of radiation patterns of the suggested PSA with the stacked AMC surface for co and cross-polarization (a) 7.25 GHz (b) 11.62 GHz.

Fig. 11. Simulated and measured gain of the suggested design with and without AMC surface.

The comparative behavior of the proposed design is depicted in Table 2. It well presents the remarkable features of the suggested structure which includes considerable size reduction, wider bandwidth and enhanced maximum gain. The suggested design compared with the previous research works with planar AMCs like [Reference Liu, Li, Yang, Qi and Xu30Reference Turpin, Wu, Werner, Martin, Bray and Lier33] introduces a broader bandwidth with more size reduction and enhanced impedance matching over the operating bandwidth.

Table 2. Comparison of suggested designs with other studies

The proposed structure is considered a following design process to show an acceptable performance:

  • Suggesting a wideband AMC design in 8–12.84 GHz (45.8%) for X-band operation and investigation of their properties in the infinite condition.

  • Designing a broadband printed slot antenna using tapered slots fed by CPW in X-band (9.05–10.95 GHz).

  • Designing a low profile printed antenna loaded with the planar AMC surface for wideband applications with improved radiation performance.

For this purpose, The suggested design compared with the previous research works with planar AMCs like [Reference Yang, Wang, Che and Wang6, Reference Zhu, Li, Liao and Xue18, Reference Ghosh, Kumar, Sen and Das19, Reference Feng, Zhai, Xi, Yang, Zhang and Yang28], and [Reference Liu, Li, Yang, Qi and Xu30Reference Alibakhshikenari, Virdee, See, Abd-Alhameed, Ali, Falcone and Limiti36 ] introduces a broader bandwidth of more than 62% and a higher gain of 8.95 dBi with enhanced impedance matching over the operating bandwidth until −38 dB. For example, a proposed MIMO array in [Reference Zhu, Li, Liao and Xue18] with the size of 75 × 75 × 12.7 mm3 indicates a wide bandwidth of 3–4.1 GHz and a maximum gain of 7.1 dBi. Also, a reported array with EBG in [Reference Alibakhshikenari, Virdee, See, Abd-Alhameed, Ali, Falcone and Limiti36] introduces a bandwidth of 8–9.25 GHz (14.5%) with 96 × 96 × 1.6 mm3 and a high gain of 7 dBi. Thus, it can be concluded that the proposed design introduces a compact wideband antenna with enhanced gain for X-band operation.

Considerations on AMC unit cells of suggested design

The performance of the stacked AMC surface developed in PSA is studied by applying an equivalent waveguide feed in the position of the one half-wavelength of the radiating slot element on the basis of the applied method in [Reference Malekpoor, Abolmasoumi and Hamidkhani34]. Based on the reflection results of the equivalent waveguide feeding, the optimal AMC reflector is determined. In this section, a new method of determining the patch's numbers to fulfill the AMC ground plane is introduced. It contributes to reduce the radiated power from the cavity structure within the operating band. This test setup consists of a waveguide feed including dielectric with the cavity which is organized by the slot conducting plate, the antenna substrate and AMC surface. The sizes and location of the waveguide feed are selected as a λ/2 radiating slot. The proposed method is developed in the center operating frequency of 10 GHz due to the operation of the suggested PSA without AMC in X-band. In the suggested test setup, an equivalent waveguide feed is chosen with the dimensions and location as λ/2 radiating slot which corresponds to the tapered slot, according to Fig. 12. It includes a waveguide feed in proportion to the tapered radiating slot. The waveguide port is stimulated with a dominant waveguide mode to calculate the reflection responses.

Fig. 12. Equivalent waveguide feed setup with the dielectric-filled rectangular waveguide.

At the same time, to recognize the number of unit cells in the reflector, the reflection properties of four stacked AMC surfaces are studied. The features of four AMC surfaces are analyzed (See Fig. 13): Case#1; 9 × 11 AMC reflector, (b) Case#2; 11 × 13 AMC reflector, (c) Case#3; 9 × 17 AMC reflector and (d) Case#4; 11 × 17 AMC reflector.

Fig. 13. Four different stacked AMC reflectors used in suggested PSA; (a) Case#1: 9 × 11 AMC surface, (b) Case#2: 11 × 13 AMC surface, (c) Case#3: 9 × 17 AMC surface and (d) Case#4: 11 × 17 AMC surface (main case).

The simulated reflection coefficients S11 for the waveguide port of the equivalent waveguide feed are plotted in Fig. 14. It clearly indicates that among four suggested cases for stacked AMC array surfaces, Case#4 has the maximum reflection response around the resonance of 10 GHz. Accordingly, the reflection coefficients of the Case#4 and Case#3 are almost close to each other, whereas its difference with Cases#1 and 2 is significant. Therefore, Case#4 is chosen for optimal design to apply in the suggested printed slot antenna. It can be concluded that by increasing the number of patches used to the AMC array, the variations in reflection coefficients are slight over the operating bandwidth.

Fig. 14. S-parameters of the suggested design by using the suggested waveguide feeding method at 10 GHz.

The simulated S-parameters of the suggested design with different stacked AMC surfaces in Fig. 11 are plotted in Fig. 15. It confirms the introduced method of the equivalent waveguide feed to recognize the optimal numbers of unit cells in the proposed structure. According to the results, the optimum Case#4 leads to wideband performance with better impedance matching.

Fig. 15. S-parameters of the suggested design for different AMC unit cells.

Conclusion

The novel design of the stacked AMC unit cell is introduced to provide a broadband response, in this study to include 8–12.84 GHz (45.8%). The introduced AMC indicates distinguished properties with proper stability within the AMC bandwidth. It is verified that the stacked AMC is helpful in broadband applications by investigating the reflection responses at the different polarization angles for diverse incident waves. The suggested PSA with tapered slots backed by AMC reflector introduces the low profile broadband structure for X-band operation. By adding stacked AMC surface into the PSA the −10 dB impedance bandwidth of 6.97–13.34 GHz is achieved. The proper impedance matching until −40 dB, excellent compactness and broader bandwidth were obtained from the suggested PSA with AMC compared with the PSA without AMC. Besides, the uni-directional radiation patterns with a high gain are achieved. From experimental results, the acceptable efficiency is reported and it is concluded that the suggested design can be used for broadband systems. Finally, the efficiency of the AMC reflector inserted in the PSA is studied utilizing an equivalent waveguide feed in the position of the λ/2 radiating slot. In this method, to select the number of AMC patches, an equivalent waveguide feed corresponding to the center frequency is considered.

Hossein Malekpoor was born in Iran, in 1985. He received the B.S. degree from Yazd University, Yazd, Iran in 2008, and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in telecommunication engineering from Shiraz University of Technology, Shiraz, Iran in 2012 and 2016 respectively.

He joined the faculty of Arak University in 2017, where he is currently an assistant professor with the Electrical Engineering Department. His research interests include microwave devices, radar systems, different antennas design, wideband microstrip antennas for UWB applications and wireless communications, analysis of antenna with equivalent circuit models, phased array antennas, periodic structures such as EBGs, AMCs and FSSs, antenna design with EBG and AMC surfaces and MIMO arrays.

Mehdi Hamidkhani was born in Esfahan, Iran, in 1985. He received the B.E. degree in electrical engineering from the Yazd University, Iran, in 2007, and the M.Sc. degree in electrical engineering from the Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST), Tehran, Iran, in 2010, and the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran, in 2016.

He is currently a professor assistant at the Islamic Azad University Dolatabad Branch, Isfahan, Iran. His current research interests are RF microwave circuits, antenna, wireless networks, IoT.

References

Wang, Z, Sun, Y, Yang, J and Zhang, Y (2019) Interferograms of votex FWM beam for nonlinear spatial filter in photonic band gap. IEEE Photonics Journal 11, 18541859.Google Scholar
Jam, S and Malekpoor, H (2016) Compact 1 × 4 patch antenna array by means of EBG structures with enhanced bandwidth. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters 58, 29832989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malekpoor, H and Jam, S (2018) Design, analysis, and modeling of miniaturized multi-band patch arrays using mushroom-type electromagnetic band gap structures. International Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering 28, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadarig, RC, de Cos, ME, Á lvarez, Y and Heras, FL (2011) Novel bow-tie antenna on artificial magnetic conductor for 5.8 GHz radio frequency identification tags usable with metallic objects. IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation 5, 10971102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malekpoor, H (2019) Comparative investigation of reflection and band gap properties of finite periodic wideband artificial magnetic conductor surfaces for microwave circuits applications in X-band. International Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering 29, e21874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, W, Wang, H, Che, W and Wang, J (2013) A wideband and high-gain edge-fed patch antenna and array using artificial magnetic conductor structures. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 12, 769772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajagopal, S, Chennakesavan, G, Subburaj, DRP, Srinivasan, R and Varadhan, A (2017) A dual polarized antenna on a novel broadband multilayer artificial magnetic conductor backed surface for LTE/CDMA/GSM base station applications. AEÜ – International Journal of Electronics and Communications 80, 7379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, JM, Iskander, MF and Lee, JJ (2007) Ultrawideband hybrid EBG/ferrite ground plane for low-profile array antennas. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 55, 412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nashaat, D, Elsadek, HA, Abdallah, EA, Iskander, MF and Hennawy, HME (2011) Ultrawide bandwidth 2×2 microstrip patch array antenna using electromagnetic band-gap structure (EBG). IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 59, 15281534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barth, S and Iyer, AK (2016) A miniaturized uniplanar metamaterial-based EBG for parallel-plate mode suppression. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 64, 11761185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sievenpiper, D, Zhang, L, Broas, RFJ, Alex́opolous, NG and Yablonovitch, E (1999) High-impedance electromagnetic surfaces with a forbidden frequency band. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 47, 20592074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deng, JY, Li, JY, Zhao, L and Guo, LX (2017) A dual-band inverted-F MIMO antenna With enhanced isolation for WLAN applications. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 6, 22702273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malekpoor, H and Jam, S (2016) Improved radiation performance of low profile printed slot antenna using wideband planar AMC surface. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 64, 46264638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameri, E, Esmaeli, SH and Sedighy, SH (2018) Wide band radar cross-section reduction by thin AMC structure. AEÜ – International Journal of Electronics and Communications 93, 150153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghosh, S, Tran, TN and Ngoc, TL (2014) Dual-Layer EBG based miniaturized multi-element antenna for MIMO systems. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 62, 39853997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, XY, Di, YH, Liu, H, Wu, Z and Tentzeris, MM (2015) A planar windmill-like broadband antenna equipped with artificial magnetic conductor for off-body communications. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 15, 6467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malekpoor, H and Hamidkhani, M (2021) Performance enhancement of low-profile wideband multi-element MIMO arrays backed by AMC surface for vehicular wireless communications. IEEE ACCESS 9, 166206166222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, J, Li, S, Liao, S and Xue, Q (2018) Wideband Low-profile highly isolated MIMO antenna with artificial magnetic conductor. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 17, 458462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghosh, A, Kumar, V, Sen, G and Das, S (2018) Gain enhancement of triple-band patch antenna by using triple-band artificial magnetic conductor. IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation 12, 14001406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Othman, N, Samsuri, NA, Ka, M, Rahim, A and Kamardin, K (2020) Low specific absorption rate and gain-enhanced meandered bowtie antenna utilizing flexible dipole-like artificial magnetic conductor for medical application at 2.4 GHz. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters 62, 38813889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Cos, ME, Álvarez, Y and Heras, FL (2009) Planar artificial magnetic conductor: design and characterization setup in the RFID SHF band. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 23, 14671478.Google Scholar
Hadarig, RC, de Cos, ME and Heras, FL (2013) Novel miniaturized artificial magnetic conductor. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 12, 174177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malekpoor, H and Hamidkhani, M (2019) Compact multi-band stacked circular patch antenna for wideband applications with enhanced gain. Electromagnetics 39, 241253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malekpoor, H and Hamidkhani, M (2021) Bandwidth and gain improvement for reduced size of stacked microstrip antenna fed by folded triangular patch with half V-shaped slot. International Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering 31, e22649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malekpoor, H and Jam, S (2015) Analysis on bandwidth enhancement of compact probe-fed patch antenna with equivalent transmission line model. IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation 9, 11361143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Z and Deng, C (2020) High-Isolated MIMO antenna design based on pattern diversity for 5 G Mobile terminals. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 19, 467471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, BS and Shamim, A (2013) Flexible and compact AMC based antenna for telemedicine applications. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 61, 524531.Google Scholar
Feng, D, Zhai, H, Xi, L, Yang, S, Zhang, K and Yang, D (2017) A broadband low-profile circular-polarized antenna on an AMC reflector. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 16, 28402843.Google Scholar
Yan, S, Soh, PJ, Mercuri, M, Schreurs, DMM-P and Vandenbosch, GAE (2015) Low profile dual-band antenna loaded with artificial magnetic conductor for indoor radar systems. IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation 9, 184190.Google Scholar
Liu, J, Li, JY, Yang, JJ, Qi, YX and Xu, R (2020) AMC-loaded low-profile circularly polarized reconfigurable antenna array. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 19, 12761280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, G, Zhai, H, Li, L, Liang, C, Yu, R and Liu, S (2015) AMC-loaded wideband base station antenna for indoor access point in MIMO system. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 63, 525533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhong, YW, Yang, GM and Zhong, LR (2015) Gain enhancement of bow-tie antenna using fractal wideband artificial magnetic conductor ground. Electronics Letters 51, 315317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turpin, JP, Wu, Q, Werner, DH, Martin, B, Bray, M and Lier, E (2014) Near-zero-index metamaterial lens combined with AMC metasurface for high-directivity low-profile antennas. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 62, 19281936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malekpoor, H, Abolmasoumi, A and Hamidkhani, M (2022) High gain, high isolation, and low-profile two-element MIMO array loaded by the Giuseppe Peano AMC reflector for wireless communication systems. IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation 16, 4661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alibakhshikenari, M, Khalily, M, Virdee, BS, See, CH, Abd-Alhameed, R, Falcone, F and Limiti, E (2019) Mutual coupling suppression between two closely placed microstrip patches using EM-bandgap metamaterial fractal loading. IEEE Access 7, 2360623614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alibakhshikenari, M, Virdee, BS, See, CH, Abd-Alhameed, R, Ali, AH, Falcone, F and Limiti, E (2018) Study on isolation improvement between closely packed patch antenna arrays based on fractal metamaterial electromagnetic bandgap structures. IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation 12, 28, 22412247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Structure of the suggested PSA backed by the broadband stacked AMC reflector.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. (a) Equivalent circuit for simple patch (b) Equivalent circuit for PSA with tapered slots.

Figure 2

Table 1. Sizes of suggested PSA backed by the AMC

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Images of fabricated cases of the PSA backed by the stacked AMC reflector.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. (a) Structure of suggested stacked design and simulation box by using Floquet theory (b) equivalent circuit model.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Flow chart of the design process for the proposed structure.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Reflection phase of TE/TM responses of stacked AMC for indirect incident waves in φ = 0̊ and 90°.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. Measurement and simulation results of S-parameters of the suggested PSA without AMC.

Figure 8

Fig. 8. Measurement and simulation results of S-parameters of the suggested PSA with stacked AMC.

Figure 9

Fig. 9. Surface current density on the patch of the proposed antenna with stacked AMC at: (a) 7.25 (b) 11.62 GHz.

Figure 10

Fig. 10. Measurement and simulation results of radiation patterns of the suggested PSA with the stacked AMC surface for co and cross-polarization (a) 7.25 GHz (b) 11.62 GHz.

Figure 11

Fig. 11. Simulated and measured gain of the suggested design with and without AMC surface.

Figure 12

Table 2. Comparison of suggested designs with other studies

Figure 13

Fig. 12. Equivalent waveguide feed setup with the dielectric-filled rectangular waveguide.

Figure 14

Fig. 13. Four different stacked AMC reflectors used in suggested PSA; (a) Case#1: 9 × 11 AMC surface, (b) Case#2: 11 × 13 AMC surface, (c) Case#3: 9 × 17 AMC surface and (d) Case#4: 11 × 17 AMC surface (main case).

Figure 15

Fig. 14. S-parameters of the suggested design by using the suggested waveguide feeding method at 10 GHz.

Figure 16

Fig. 15. S-parameters of the suggested design for different AMC unit cells.