Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T03:33:14.229Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Design of graded honeycomb radar absorbing structure with wide-band and wide-angle properties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2018

Yuchen Zhao ,
Fang Ren ,
Li He ,
Jinsheng Zhang ,
Yanning Yuan  and
Xiaoli Xi
Yuchen Zhao
Affiliation:
Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 710048, China
Fang Ren
Affiliation:
Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 710048, China
Li He
Affiliation:
Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 710048, China
Jinsheng Zhang
Affiliation:
Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 710048, China Xi'an High-tech Institute, Xi'an 710025, China
Yanning Yuan
Affiliation:
Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 710048, China
Xiaoli Xi*
Affiliation:
Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 710048, China
*
Author for correspondence: Xiaoli Xi, E-mail: xixiaoli@xaut.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, the design of a graded honeycomb radar absorbing structure (RAS) is presented to realize both a wide bandwidth and absorption over a wide range of angles. For both transverse-electric and transverse-magnetic polarization, a fractional bandwidth of more than 118.6% is achieved for at least a 10 dB reflectivity reduction when the incident angle is <45°, an 8 dB reduction when the incident angle is <55° and a 5 dB reduction when the incident angle is <70°. Meanwhile the 10 dB reduction upper angle limit is approximately 30° for the uniform coating honeycomb RAS in the literature, which loses its absorbing ability when the incident angle is larger than 55°. Furthermore, the total thickness of our design is 10.7 mm, which is only approximately 1.29 times that of the theoretical limitation. The good agreement between the calculated, simulated, and measured results demonstrates the validity of this optimization.

Keywords

Effective permittivitygraded honeycomb radar absorbing structurewide-anglewide-band
Type
Research Papers
Information
International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , March 2019 , pp. 143 - 150
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Choi, I, Lee, DY and Lee, DG (2015) Radar absorbing composite structures dispersed with nano-conductive particles. Composite Structures 122, 1171–1177.Google Scholar
2.Nam, YW, Choi, JH, Lee, WJ and Kim, CG (2017) Thin and lightweight radar-absorbing structure containing glass fabric coated with silver by sputtering. Composite Structures 160, 1171–1177.Google Scholar
3.Teber, A, Unver, I, Kavas, H, Aktas, B and Bansal, R (2016) Knitted radar absorbing materials (RAM) based on nickel–cobalt magnetic materials. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 406, 228–232.Google Scholar
4.Ghayekhloo, A, Afsahi, M and Orouji, AA (2017) Checkerboard plasma electromagnetic surface for wideband and wide-angle bistatic radar cross section reduction. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science 45, 603–609.Google Scholar
5.Mishra, N, Khusboo, K and Chaudhary, RK (2018) An ultra-thin polarization independent quad-band microwave absorber-based on compact metamaterial structures for EMI/EMC applications. International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies 10, 422–429.Google Scholar
6.D'Elia, UF, Pelosi, G, Selleri, S and Taddei, R (2010) A carbon-nanotube-based frequency-selective absorber. International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies 10, 479–485.Google Scholar
7.Shen, Y, Pei, Z, Pang, Y, Wang, J, Zhang, A and Qu, S (2015) Phase random metasurfaces for broadband wide-angle radar cross section reduction. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters 52, 2813–2819.Google Scholar
8.Ayop, O, Rahim, MKA, Murad, NA and Samsuri, NA (2016) Dual-resonant polarization-independent and wide-angle metamaterial absorber in X-band frequency. Applied Physics A: Solids and Surfaces 122, 374.Google Scholar
9.Smith, FC (1999) Effective permittivity of dielectric honeycombs. IEE Proceedings – Microwaves, Antennas and Propagation 146, 55–59.Google Scholar
10.Smith, FC and Scarpa, F (2004) Design of honeycomb-like composites for electromagnetic and structural applications. IEE Proceedings – Science, Measurement and Technology 151, 9–15.Google Scholar
11.Chen, MJ, Pei, YM and Fang, DN (2010) Computational method for microwave absorbing structures with 2-D Kagome lattice grids. International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics 33, 1691–1694.Google Scholar
12.Smith, FC, Scarpa, F and Chambers, B (2000) The electromagnetic properties of re-entrant dielectric honeycombs. IEEE Microwave and Optical Technology Letters 10, 451–453.Google Scholar
13.Kopyt, P, Damian, R, Celuch, M and Ciobanu, R (2010) Dielectric properties of chiral honeycombs – modelling and experiment. Composites Science and Technology 70, 1080–1088.Google Scholar
14.Ciobanu, R, Damian, R and Casian-Botez, I (2010) Electromagnetic characterization of chiral auxetic metamaterials for EMC applications. Computer Standards & Interfaces 32, 101–109.Google Scholar
15.Xie, S, Ji, ZJ, Yang, Y, Hou, GY and Wang, J (2016) Electromagnetic wave absorption properties of honeycomb structured plasterboards in S and C bands. Journal of Building Engineering 7, 217–233.Google Scholar
16.He, YF, Gong, RZ, Cao, H, Wang, X and Zheng, Y (2007) Preparation and microwave absorption properties of metal magnetic micropower-coated honeycomb sandwich structures. Smart Materials and Structures 16, 1501–1505.Google Scholar
17.Khurram, AA, Ali, N, Rakha, SA, Zhou, PH and Munir, A (2014) Optimization of the carbon coating of honeycomb cores for broadband microwave absorption. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility 56, 1061–1065.Google Scholar
18.Chen, MJ, Pei, YM and Fang, DN (2009) Computational method for radar absorbing composite lattice grids. Computational Materials Science 46, 591–594.Google Scholar
19.Ouchetto, O, Majd, BAE, Ouchetto, H, Essakhi, B and Zouhdi, S (2016) Homogenization of periodic structured materials with chiral properties. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 64, 1751–1758.Google Scholar
20.Quiévy, N, Bollen, P, Thomassin, JM, Detrembleur, C, Pardoen, T, Bailly, C and Huynen, I (2012) Electromagnetic absorption properties of carbon nanotube nanocomposite foam filling honeycomb waveguide structures. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility 54, 43–51.Google Scholar
21.Zhou, PH, Huang, LR, Xie, JL, Liang, DF, Lu, HP and Dong, LJ (2012) A study on the effective permittivity of carbon/PI honeycomb composites for radar absorbing design. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 60, 3679–3683.Google Scholar
22.Qiu, KP, Feng, SQ, Wu, C, Zhang, WH and Liu, ZJ (2016) Calculation of effective permittivity and optimization of absorption property of honeycomb cores with absorbing coatings. Materials Science (Medžiagotyra) 22, 318–322.Google Scholar
23.Liu, L, Fan, CZ, Zhu, NB, Zhao, ZY and Liu, RP (2014) Effective electromagnetic properties of honeycomb substrate coated with dielectric or magnetic layer. Applied Physics A: Materials 116, 901–905.Google Scholar
24.Zhao, YC, Liu, JF, Song, ZG and Xi, XL (2016) Novel closed-form expressions for effective electromagnetic parameters of honeycomb radar absorbing structure. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 64, 1768–1778.Google Scholar
25.Johansson, M, Holloway, CL and Kuester, EF (2005) Effective electromagnetic properties of honeycomb composites, and hollow-pyramidal and alternating-wedge absorbers. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 53, 728–736.Google Scholar
26.Choi, WH, Shin, JH, Song, TH, Lee, WY, Lee, WJ and Kim, CG (2016) Design of broadband microwave absorber using honeycomb structure. Electronics Letters 50, 292–293.Google Scholar
27.Choi, WH and Kim, CG (2015) Broadband microwave-absorbing honeycomb structure with novel design concept. Composites Part B: Engineering 83, 14–20.Google Scholar
28.Fan, HL, Yang, W and Chao, ZM (2007) Microwave absorbing composite lattice grids. Composites Science and Technology 67, 3472–3479.Google Scholar
29.Feng, J, Zhang, YC, Wang, P and Fan, HL (2016) Oblique incidence performance of radar absorbing honeycombs. Composites Part B: Engineering 99, 465–471.Google Scholar
30.Wang, P, Zhang, YC, Chen, H, Zhou, Y, Jin, F and Fan, HL (2018) Broadband radar absorption and mechanical behaviors of bendable over-expanded honeycomb panels. Composites Science and Technology 162, 33–48.Google Scholar
31.Zhou, PH, Huang, LR, Xie, JL, Liang, DF, Lu, HP and Dong, LJ (2015) Prediction of microwave absorption behavior of graded honeycomb composites based on effective permittivity formulas. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 63, 3496–3501.Google Scholar
32.Rinaldi, A, Proietti, A, Tamburrano, A and Sarto, MS (2018) Graphene-coated honeycomb for broadband lightweight absorbers, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility 60, 1454–1462.Google Scholar
33.Zhao, YC, Liu, JF, Song, ZG and Xi, XL (2017) Novel design method for graded honeycomb radar absorbing structure based on dispersive effective permittivity formula. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation 16, 1281–1284.Google Scholar
34.Doane, JP, Sertel, KS and Volakis, JL (2013) Matching bandwidth limits for arrays backed by a conducting ground plane. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 61, 2511–2518.Google Scholar