Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:39:39.136Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A dual-material strategy for enhancing the temperature robustness of microwave resonant cavity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2022

Dongxu Fu
Affiliation:
Tianjin Key Laboratory of Imaging and Sensing Microelectronic Technology, School of Microelectronics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
Xia Xiao*
Affiliation:
Tianjin Key Laboratory of Imaging and Sensing Microelectronic Technology, School of Microelectronics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
Linshuo Gu
Affiliation:
Tianjin Key Laboratory of Imaging and Sensing Microelectronic Technology, School of Microelectronics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
*
Author for correspondence: Xia Xiao, E-mail: xiaxiao@tju.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Resonant frequency varies significantly due to temperature changes for microwave resonant cavities. Hence, temperature robustness enhancement is of great importance. In this paper, a resonant cavity with enhanced temperature robustness is proposed by applying the dual-material strategy to the middle cavity. Compared to the single-material cavity, the dual-material cavity can demonstrate better temperature robustness with a decrease of 72.7% in the frequency shift over the temperature range of −20 to 80°C. Moreover, the |S11| < −10 dB impedance bandwidth is 6.3% (3.39–3.61 GHz) and the gain is 20.4 dBi at 3.5 GHz for the manufactured dual-material cavity, which are much better than those of the manufactured single-material cavity. Finally, an experiment is conducted to measure the resonant frequencies with the sample solution tube of the dual-material cavity filled with nothing or 30 mg/dl CuSO4 solution, the measured values are consistent with the simulated ones. The influence of temperature drift is significantly reduced, and the feasibility of the dual-material strategy is verified.

Type
Microwave Measurements
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the European Microwave Association

Introduction

Microwave resonant cavity is a type of sensor which is based on microwave measurement technology. It possesses the characteristics of highquality factor, low loss, and high stability. The primary working principle is the cavity perturbation technique, that is, the sample is tested assuming that the change in the internal state of the cavity before and after a small perturbation is almost the same [Reference Qiao, Xia, Hao and Liang1Reference Marchal, Yousfi and Merbahi4]. When the resonant cavity meets the perturbation condition, the electromagnetic parameters of the substance can be measured based on the frequency variation of the resonant cavity, which helps to unify the characteristic parameters of the substance to be measured and the electromagnetic parameters of the microwave resonant cavity [Reference Kim, Minz and Park5Reference Tian and Wang7]. This helps to achieve accurate detection by using a resonant cavity. The specific working steps are as follows. An empty cavity is generated in the center of the closed conductor to form a microwave resonant cavity. The electromagnetic waves are reflected by the conductor wall of the cavity so that the electromagnetic energy oscillates in the process of mutual conversion. This helps to obtain the characteristic parameters of the resonant cavity. The electromagnetic waves in the position of the tested substance have the property of superposition, which can be used for analyzing some properties of the tested substance [Reference Tsankova, Richter and Madigan8Reference Chao and Chang10].

As a sensor, a resonant cavity is used to measure the permittivity of leaves in biology [Reference Chengyu11]. A rectangular resonant cavity is used to measure the salt and water content in the dried ham [Reference Bjarnadottir, Lunde and Alvseike12]. It is used in the medical industry such as medical cyclotrons [Reference Junwang13], and to measure the humidity of the wet steam so as to improve the efficiency of steam turbine units in the mechanical industry [Reference Jiangbo14].

The microwave resonant cavity is influenced by multiple physical fields, including electromagnetic field, temperature field, and stress field when it is working. The resonant cavity usually works in a wide temperature range. Due to the coefficient of thermal expansion of the materials, the resonant frequency changes as the cavity structure changes caused by the ambient temperature change, leading to a larger standing wave ratio, an increase in loss and phase offset, which is identified as temperature drift. If the variation in amplitude and phase caused by temperature drift exceeds a certain value, the transmission quality of the signal will decline, leading to large errors. Moreover, at high frequencies, microwave resonant cavity suffers from low gain, poor radiation efficiency and narrow bandwidth [Reference Bilal, Angel, Cleofas, Ruiz and Padilla15, Reference Chemweno, Kumar and Afullo Thomas16]. Therefore, it is of great necessity to enhance the temperature performance of the resonant cavity [Reference Chorom, Jin-Kwan, Hee-Jo, Gi-Ho and Jong-Gwan17].

At present, there are several methods to implement the temperature robustness enhancement of the resonant cavity. A resonant rod that can be automatically adjusted with temperature was used by Cogdell et al. to ensure that the capacitance between the resonant rod and the cavity remains unaltered [Reference Cogdell, Deam and Straition18]. The temperature performance enhancement with the help of a spring device made of Shape Memory Alloy (SMA) was achieved by Keats et al. [Reference Keats, Gorbet and Mansour19]. The coefficient of thermal expansion of dielectric material and metal material was used by Sang-Kyu et al. to reduce the influence of temperature drift [Reference Sang-Kyu, Han-Young, Jun-Chul and Chul20]. By monitoring two working modes of a specific resonant cavity, Cuenca et al. proposed a method to correct the influence of temperature on the system during the perturbation measurement of the resonant cavity [Reference Cuenca, Slocombe and Porch21]. A split degenerate TMm10 mode of the cylindrical cavity was innovatively designed by Barter et al. to enhance the temperature robustness [Reference Barter, Partridge, Slocombe and Porch22].

In this paper, a resonant cavity with enhanced temperature performance and working mode of TM010. Considering the compensation effect of the coefficient of thermal expansion of the materials, the approach of dual-material is presented. Coupling analysis of the electromagnetic field, steady-state thermal field and static structural field is set up to test the temperature performance of the single and dual-material cavities. Moreover, electromagnetic parameters of both cavities are compared such as the radiation pattern, |S 11| < −10 dB impedance bandwidth and gain. The simulated and measured results show that the dual-material cavity has better electromagnetic characteristics, and the dual-material strategy manages to enhance the temperature robustness.

This paper is organized as follows. Section ‘Resonant cavity design’ introduces the details of the resonant cavity design. Section ‘Results and discussion’ presents the simulation and experiment, together with corresponding results to demonstrate the performance of single and dual-material cavities. Finally, Section ‘Conclusions’ gives the conclusion to elaborate on the achieved results and discusses future work.

Resonant cavity design

Modal analysis of the conventional cavity

The cylindrical microwave resonant cavity is selected in this work because of its simple geometric structure and high inherent quality factor.

As demonstrated in Fig. 1, the conventional cavity is made of copper. Since the direction of the electric field near the axis of the cavity under TM010 mode is parallel to the axis and the electric field intensity is the maximum, the highest measurement sensitivity can be observed by placing the sample solution tube at this position. The probe coupling, through which energy exchanges between the resonant cavity and the outside space is realized by two SMA connectors positioned 20 mm away from the axis of the cavity. The height of the top and bottom is negligible since they just help to form a closed cavity. The resonant frequency of the empty cavity is approximately 3.5 GHz. The structure parameters of the conventional cavity are shown in Table 1.

Fig. 1. Schematic configuration of the structure of the conventional cavity.

Table 1. Structure parameters of the conventional cavity

In order to test the temperature robustness of the cavity, coupling analysis of the electromagnetic field, steady-state thermal field, and static structural field is set up in the finite element emulator and demonstrated in Fig. 2. The temperature range is set from −20 to 80°C, with the step of 10°C. Figure 3 shows the resonant frequency of the cavity with respect to the temperature. The resonant frequency of the conventional resonant cavity varies significantly in a wide temperature operating range, which indicates that it has poor temperature robustness.

Fig. 2. Coupling analysis of electromagnetic field – steady-state thermal field – static structural field in finite element emulator.

Fig. 3. Resonant frequency with respect to the temperature of the conventional cavity.

Dual-material strategy

According to the qualitative analysis results, the change of each dimension is determined by the coefficient of thermal expansion of the materials, nominal value, and temperature changes. The radius and height of the cavity increase with the increase in temperature, leading to a decrease in the resonant frequency [Reference Chi and Kawthar23]. In order to enhance the temperature robustness, the impact on the resonant frequency caused by the structure change of the cavity should be diminished or even eliminated. The temperature performance can thus be improved when the cavity radius and cavity height decrease as the temperature increases. Considering this, applying the dual-material strategy to the middle cavity is proposed. The key point is to optimize the ratio of the two materials.

Some common metals and coefficients of thermal expansion are listed in Table 2.

Table 2. Metal materials commonly used in the cavity and the coefficient of thermal expansion

According to Table 2, brass and aluminum are the two preferred materials.

Parameter study

Figure 4 demonstrates the optimization results of cavity radius R, the distance between SMA and solution tube DSMA, the best ratio of brass to aluminum L 1/L 2, and the height of the aluminum section HAluminum. According to the optimization results. R = 29.8 mm, DSMA = 17.0 mm, L 1/L 2 = 2.0 and HAluminum = 10.1 mm are chosen for the cavity design.

Fig. 4. Parameter optimization of (a) cavity radius, (b) distance between SMA and solution tube, (c) ratio of brass to aluminum, and (d) height of the aluminum section.

Once the above optimization process is finished, the proposed dual-material cavity with good temperature robustness is derived, as demonstrated in Fig. 5. Compared to the conventional cavity, in the proposed cavity, the material of the top and bottom is replaced by brass, and the copper in the middle cavity is replaced by the combination of brass and aluminum. Table 3 shows the parameters of the proposed cavity.

Fig. 5. Schematic configuration of the structure of the proposed cavity.

Table 3. Structure parameters of the proposed cavity

Results and discussion

Validation by simulation

The analysis of the proposed cavity is conducted based on the research settings in Fig. 2. The corresponding cavity states at three temperatures of −20, 20 and 80°C are selected for comparison.

The results of the proposed cavity in the steady-state thermal field are demonstrated in Fig. 6. At temperatures of −20, 20 and 80°C, heat is uniform in all parts of the cavity after optimization and the three states are the same. This indicates a stable state in the wide temperature range.

Fig. 6. Simulation results of the proposed cavity in the steady-state thermal field at (a) −20°C, (b) 20°C, and (c) 80°C.

Figure 7 demonstrates the results of the proposed cavity in the static structural field. The results suggest that the cavity has the same deformation state in a wide operating temperature range.

Fig. 7. Simulation results of the proposed cavity in the static structural field at (a) −20°C, (b) 20°C, and (c) 80°C.

Figure 8 shows the measured and simulated results of the radiation pattern of two cavities. The results imply that there is better agreement between the measured and simulated results of the proposed cavity than that of the conventional cavity.

Fig. 8. Measured and simulated radiation pattern results on X–Z plane of (a) conventional cavity, and (b) proposed cavity.

The variation of the resonant frequency of two cavities in a wide temperature range is tested. The temperature range is set from −20 to 80°C and the step is 10°C. Figure 9 shows the relationship between resonant frequency and temperature of the conventional and proposed cavities.

Fig. 9. Resonant frequency with respect to the temperature of the conventional cavity and proposed cavity.

From −20 to 80°C, the resonant frequency of the conventional cavity changes from 3.5281 to 3.3512 GHz, with a percentage change of 5.014%, while the resonant frequency of the proposed cavity varies from 3.5163 to 3.4681 GHz, which is relatively stable with a percentage change of 1.371%. There is a decrease of 72.7% in the frequency shift. In addition, when the temperature exceeds 20°C, the resonant frequency of the conventional cavity decreases significantly. The results indicate that the temperature performance of the proposed cavity is significantly enhanced.

Validation by experiment

According to the parameters of Tables 1 and 3, the two cavities are produced and the manufactured dual-material cavity is demonstrated in Fig. 10.

Fig. 10. The manufactured dual-material cavity.

After testing, the quality factor of the proposed cavity is 6425.52, which is much higher than that of the conventional cavity. According to Figs 11 and 12, the |S 11| < −10 dB impedance bandwidth of the manufactured proposed cavity is 6.3% (3.39–3.61 GHz) and gain is 20.4 dBi at 3.5 GHz, which is marginally different from the simulated results and much higher than those of the manufactured conventional cavity.

Fig. 11. S 11 of the conventional cavity and proposed cavity.

Fig. 12. Gain of the conventional cavity and proposed cavity.

The test system is set up to test the enhancement effect of temperature performance of the manufactured proposed cavity.

As shown in Fig. 13, Vector Network Analyzer (VNA) is used to show the frequency curve and the thermostat is used to control the environmental temperature. The temperature range is set the same as the former test.

Fig. 13. The system for the temperature stability test.

The measured resonant frequencies at different temperatures are measured and listed in Table 4 when the sample solution tube is empty, which are compared with the simulated results. The right side of the table shows the percentage errors relative to the simulated results. The measured values vary from 3.5238 to 3.4701 GHz. The average error with respect to the simulated results is 0.161%.

Table 4. Comparison of the simulated and measured results of the proposed cavity

The sample solution tube is empty.

For further testing of the cavity's temperature performance, 30 mg/dl CuSO4 solution is used. The results are listed in Table 5. Under the same temperature condition, there is an average error between the measured values and the simulated values, which is 0.154%. The results show that the difference between the simulated and measured values is small, which indicates the feasibility of the dual-material strategy.

Table 5. Comparison of the simulated and measured results of the proposed cavity

The sample solution tube is filled with 30 mg/dl CuSO4 solution.

Conclusions

In this paper, a microwave resonant cavity with enhanced temperature robustness is proposed, in which the dual-material approach is applied to enhance the temperature robustness. Coupling analysis of the electromagnetic field, steady-state thermal field, and static structural field is set up to test the temperature robustness. The simulated results indicate that the heating condition and cavity deformation of the dual-material cavity at different temperatures remain the same in a wide temperature range, and the resonant frequency is relatively stable with the resonant frequency percentage change of 1.371%, which is better than that of the single-material cavity. Based on the experimental results, the high-quality factor, compatibility of the radiation pattern and gain, together with the |S 11| < −10 dB impedance bandwidth of 6.3% are achieved for the dual-material cavity, which are obviously better than those of the single-material cavity. The dual-material cavity is fabricated to verify the design method, and the measured results agree well with the simulated ones demonstrating high temperature robustness. The results indicate that the dual-material cavity has better electromagnetic characteristics, and the proposed strategy is feasible. Moreover, the high-quality factor, gain values and temperature robustness make the resonant cavity suitable for high-accuracy solution concentration measurement.

Based on this work, more research can be conducted on temperature compensation algorithms in the future to further enhance the temperature robustness of the cavity. The dual-material strategy can be applied to other sensors to verify its universality. Apart from the solution concentration measurement, gas or gas-liquid mixture concentration measurement can be carried out by using the dual-material cavity.

Data

Research data are not shared.

Author contributions

Xia Xiao and Dongxu Fu derived the theory. Linshuo Gu and Dongxu Fu performed the simulations and experiments. All authors contributed equally to analyzing data and reaching conclusions, and in writing the paper.

Financial support

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Dongxu Fu obtained his B.S. in electronic information science and technology from the University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China, in 2020. Currently, he is a master student of integrated circuit engineering at Tianjin University. His research interests include the temperature robustness enhancement of microwave resonant cavity, electromagnetic properties of microwave resonant cavity, solution concentration measurement methods and systems based on microwave perturbation technology.

Xia Xiao obtained her B.S. in physics and M.S. in condensed physics from Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, China, in 1993 and 1996, respectively, and the Ph.D. in electronic and information technology from the Technical University of Chemnitz, Germany, in 2002. From 2007 till now, she is a professor in Tianjin University. Her research interests include the electromagnetic characteristics of microwave resonant cavity, target detection by UWB microwave imaging, non-invasive blood glucose by microwave detection, and non-destructive characterization of film properties by surface acoustic waves.

Linshuo Gu obtained his B.S. in electronic science and technology from Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin, China, in 2017. Currently, he is a master student of integrated circuit engineering at Tianjin University. His research interests include the solution concentration measurement methods and systems based on microwave perturbation technology.

References

Qiao, L, Xia, X, Hao, F and Liang, W (2018) Glucose solution concentration detection using TE011 microwave resonant cavity. Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications 32, 18241833.Google Scholar
Peter, R and Fischerauer, G (2018) De-embedding method for strongly coupled cavities. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 66, 20252033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivanchenko, I, Khruslov, M, Popenko, N, Plakhtii, V and Tkach, V (2020) Modified cavity perturbation method for high-precision measurements of complex permittivity throughout the X-band. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters 62, 31803185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchal, F, Yousfi, M and Merbahi, N (2016) Quantitative determination of density of ground state atomic oxygen from both TALIF and emission spectroscopy in hot air plasma generated by microwave resonant cavity. Plasma Science and Technology 18, 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, CK, Minz, L and Park, SO (2007) Improved measurement method of material properties using continuous cavity perturbation without relocation. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 69, 57025716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miura, T and Tahara, K (2005) Frequency-dependent permeability evaluation by harmonic resonance cavity perturbation method. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 68, 17731782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tian, Q and Wang, C (2017) Quantitative detection of glucose level based on radiofrequency patch biosensor combined with volume-fixed structures. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 98, 357363.Google Scholar
Tsankova, G, Richter, M and Madigan, A (2016) Characterisation of a microwave re-entrant cavity resonator for phase-equilibrium measurements and new dew-point data for a (0.25 argon + 0.75 carbon dioxide) mixture. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics 101, 395404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, GG, Sagi, O and Markus, BG (2018) A highly accurate measurement of resonator Q-factor and resonance frequency. Review of Entific Instruments 89, 24592487.Google Scholar
Chao, HW and Chang, TH (2018) Wide-range permittivity measurement with a parametric-dependent cavity. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 66, 46414648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chengyu, L (2007) Microwave cavity perturbation method to measure the permittivity of plant leaves. Journal of Changchun Normal University (Natural Science Edition) 26, 4446.Google Scholar
Bjarnadottir, SG, Lunde, K and Alvseike, O (2015) Assessing quality parameters in dry-cured ham using microwave spectroscopy. Meat Science 108, 109114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Junwang, G (2006) Analysis of RF cavity for a small medical cyclotron with low energy by FEM. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Nature Science 34, 6567.Google Scholar
Jiangbo, Q (2012) Theoretical analysis of cavity perturbation techniques for measuring wet steam tow-phase flow. Proceedings of the Chinese Society of Electrical Engineering 32, 7985.Google Scholar
Bilal, HM, Angel, PC, Cleofas, SG, Ruiz, FG and Padilla, P (2021) SIW cavity-backed antenna array based on double slots for mmWave communications. Applied Science-Basel 11, 4824.Google Scholar
Chemweno, EK, Kumar, P and Afullo Thomas, JO (2022) Substrate integrated waveguide-dielectric resonator antenna for future wireless communication. SAIEE Africa Research Journal 113, 119128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chorom, J, Jin-Kwan, P, Hee-Jo, L, Gi-Ho, Y and Jong-Gwan, Y (2018) Temperature-corrected fluidic glucose sensor based on microwave resonator. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 18, 3850.Google Scholar
Cogdell, JR, Deam, AP and Straition, AW (1960) Temperature compensation of coaxial cavities. IRE Transactions on Microwave Theory & Techniques 8, 151155.Google Scholar
Keats, BF, Gorbet, RB and Mansour, RR (2003) Designed and testing of SMA temperature-compensated cavity resonators. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory & Techniques 51, 22842289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sang-Kyu, L, Han-Young, L, Jun-Chul, K and Chul, A (1999) The design of a temperature-stable stepped-impedance resonator using composite ceramic materials. IEEE Microwave and Guided Wave Letters 9, 143144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuenca, JA, Slocombe, DR and Porch, A (2017) Temperature correction for cylindrical cavity perturbation measurements. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 65, 21532161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barter, M, Partridge, S, Slocombe, DR and Porch, A (2019) Temperature correction using degenerate modes for cylindrical cavity perturbation measurements. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 67, 800805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chi, W and Kawthar, AZ (1999) Temperature compensation of combline resonators and filters. 1999 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest. (Cat. No.99CH36282) Anaheim, CA, USA, pp. 10411044. doi: 10.1109/MWSYM.1999.779566.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Schematic configuration of the structure of the conventional cavity.

Figure 1

Table 1. Structure parameters of the conventional cavity

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Coupling analysis of electromagnetic field – steady-state thermal field – static structural field in finite element emulator.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Resonant frequency with respect to the temperature of the conventional cavity.

Figure 4

Table 2. Metal materials commonly used in the cavity and the coefficient of thermal expansion

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Parameter optimization of (a) cavity radius, (b) distance between SMA and solution tube, (c) ratio of brass to aluminum, and (d) height of the aluminum section.

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Schematic configuration of the structure of the proposed cavity.

Figure 7

Table 3. Structure parameters of the proposed cavity

Figure 8

Fig. 6. Simulation results of the proposed cavity in the steady-state thermal field at (a) −20°C, (b) 20°C, and (c) 80°C.

Figure 9

Fig. 7. Simulation results of the proposed cavity in the static structural field at (a) −20°C, (b) 20°C, and (c) 80°C.

Figure 10

Fig. 8. Measured and simulated radiation pattern results on X–Z plane of (a) conventional cavity, and (b) proposed cavity.

Figure 11

Fig. 9. Resonant frequency with respect to the temperature of the conventional cavity and proposed cavity.

Figure 12

Fig. 10. The manufactured dual-material cavity.

Figure 13

Fig. 11. S11 of the conventional cavity and proposed cavity.

Figure 14

Fig. 12. Gain of the conventional cavity and proposed cavity.

Figure 15

Fig. 13. The system for the temperature stability test.

Figure 16

Table 4. Comparison of the simulated and measured results of the proposed cavity

Figure 17

Table 5. Comparison of the simulated and measured results of the proposed cavity