Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:05:25.347Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

High loss liquid dielectric characterization: Comparison of microwave waveguide and resonator measurement techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2020

Z. E. Eremenko*
Affiliation:
O. Ya. Usykov Institute for Radiophysics and Electronics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine
A. I. Shubnyi
Affiliation:
O. Ya. Usykov Institute for Radiophysics and Electronics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine
A. Y. Kogut
Affiliation:
O. Ya. Usykov Institute for Radiophysics and Electronics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine
R. S. Dolia
Affiliation:
O. Ya. Usykov Institute for Radiophysics and Electronics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine
*
Author for correspondence: Z. E. Eremenko, E-mail: zoya.eremenko@gmail.com

Abstract

The microwave waveguide and resonator methods are compared as applied to the experimental determination of the dielectric properties of high loss liquids. A differential microwave waveguide cavity for measuring high loss liquids complex permittivity in a small volume has been designed and studied. This cavity consists of two circular waveguide cells with central rods made of quartz and surrounded by high loss liquid tested. The cells have different lengths to eliminate complex propagation coefficient measurement errors due to the diffraction effect on the ends of the layered waveguide cells. We have measured the wave amplitude and phase coefficients for the waveguide cavity to estimate physical properties of a high loss liquid under test. The resonant frequencies and the Q-factor of a semi-disk dielectric resonator with high loss liquid filling a capillary have been measured. We have selected water-ethanol solutions as a high loss liquid under test for both techniques. We have determined the measurement sensitivity for these two techniques. The measuring results are discussed. Both the waveguide and resonator methods provide comparable sensitivity and can be successfully used for the complex permittivity characterization of high loss liquids in small volumes.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alekseev, SI, Szabo, I and Ziskin, MC (2008) Millimeter wave reflectivity used for measurement of skin hydration with different moisturizers. Skin Research and Technology 14, 390396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaatze, U, Pottel, R and Wallush, A (1995) A new automated waveguide system for the precise measurement of complex permittivity of low – to – high – loss liquids at microwave frequencies. Measurement Science and Technology 6, 12011207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krupka, J (2006) Frequency domain complex permittivity measurements at microwave frequencies.Measurement Science and Technology 17, R55R70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mashimo, S and Yagihara, S (1989) The dielectric relaxation of mixtures of water and primary alcohol. Journal of Chemical Physics 90, 32923294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellison, WJ (2007) Permittivity of pure water, at standard atmospheric pressure over the frequency range 0–25 THz and the temperature range 0–100 C. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data 36, 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sato, T and Buchner, R (2004) Dielectric relaxation processes in ethanol/water mixtures. Journal of Physical Chemistry A 108, 50075015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masaki, K, Atsuhiro, N, Kaori, F and Shunsuke, M (2007) Complex permittivity measurement at millimetre-wave frequencies during fermentation process of Japanese sake. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 40, 5460.Google Scholar
Agilent 85070E Dielectric Probe Kit 200 MGz–50 GHz, Technical Overview Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2003–2008, Printed in USA, March 28, 5989-0222EN, 2008.Google Scholar
Afsar, M, Suwanvisan, N and Wang, Y (2005) Permittivity measurement of low and high loss liquids in the frequency range of 8 to 40 GHz using waveguide transmission line technique. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters 8, 275281.Google Scholar
Pethig, R (1992) Protein-water interactions determined by dielectric method. Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 43, 177205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barannik, AA, Cherpak, NT, Prokopenko, YV, Filipov, YF, Shaforost, EN and Shipilova, IA (2007) Two-layered disc quasi-optical dielectric resonators: electrodynamics and application perspectives for complex permittivity measurements of lossy liquids. Measurement Science and Technology 18, 22312238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaforost, ON, Klein, N, Vitusevich, SA, Barannik, AA and Cherpak, NT (2009) High-sensitive microwave characterization of organic molecule solutions of nanolitre volume. Applied Physics Letters 94, 112901–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherpak, NT, Lavrinovich, AA and Shaforost, EN (2006) Quasi-optical dielectric resonators with small cuvette and capillary filled with ethanol-water mixtures. International Journal of Infrared & millimeter waves 27, 115133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaforost, E, Barannik, A and Klein, N (2007) Whispering-gallery mode resonators for liquid droplet detection. Conference Proceedings of the Sixth International Kharkiv Symposium, Physics and Engineering of Microwaves, Millimeter and Sub-millimeter Waves and Workshop on Terahertz Technologies, MSMW ‘07, Ukraine, 2, 919921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckmaster, HA, Hansen, CH and Zaghloul, H (1985) Complex permittivity instrumentation for high-loss liquids at microwave frequencies. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 33, 822824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meriakri, VV and Parchomenko, MP (2000) The usage of dielectric waveguide for the control of water content in ethanol. Electromagnetic Waves and Systems 5, 3240.Google Scholar
Hu, X, Buckmaster, HA and Baralas, O (1994) The 9.355 GHz complex permittivity of light and heavy water from 1 to 90 °C using an improved high-precision instrumentation system. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data 39, 625638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eremenko, ZE and Ganapolskii, EM (2003) Method of microwave measurement of dielectric permittivity in small volume of high loss liquid using hemispherical cavity resonator. Measurement Science and Technology 14, 20962103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganapolskii, EM, Eremenko, ZE and Skresanov, VN (2009) A millimeter wave dielectrometer for high loss liquids based on the Zenneck wave. Measurement Science and Technology 20, 055701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skresanov, VN, Eremenko, ZE, Kuznetsova, ES, Wu, Y and He, Y (2014) Circular layered waveguide use for wideband complex permittivity measurement of lossy liquids. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 63, 694701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eremenko, ZE and Skresanov, VN (2010) High loss liquids permittivity measurement using millimeter wave differential dielectrometer. Proceedings of the 40th European Microwave Conference., Paris, France, pp. 15321535, Sept. 2010.Google Scholar
Eremenko, ZE, Skresanov, VN, Gerzhikova, VG, Zhilyakova, TA, Anikina, NS, Shubnyi, AI and Glamazdin, VV (2011) Complex permittivity measurement of high loss liquids and its application to wine analysis, In Electromagnetic Waves, Vitaliy Zhurbenko (Ed.) (InTech, Croatia). Chapter 19, 403422.Google Scholar
Eremenko, ZE, Kuznetsova, ES, Shubnyi, AI, Glamazdin, VV and Natarov, MP (2017) Differential waveguide cuvette for complex permittivity measurement of high loss liquids at microwaves, Proceedings of the 47th European Microwave Conference, Nuremberg, Germany, pp. 707710.Google Scholar
Kirichenko, AY and Kogut, AE (2008) Dielectric half-disk resonator with whispering-gallery modes for measurements of the electric properties of water. Radiophysics and Quantum Electronics 51, 695701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar