Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T03:11:14.838Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Low-profile, extremely wideband, dual-band-notched MIMO antenna for UWB applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 March 2019

Ankan Bhattacharya*
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics & Communication Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Durgapur, India Department of Electronics & Communication Engineering, Mallabhum Institute of Technology, Bishnupur, India
Bappadittya Roy
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics & Communication Engineering, Madanapalle Institute of Technology & Science, Madanapalle, India
Rafael F. S. Caldeirinha
Affiliation:
Instituto de Telecomunicações, Leiria and Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, Leiria, Portugal
Anup K. Bhattacharjee
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics & Communication Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Durgapur, India
*
Author for correspondence: Ankan Bhattacharya, E-mail: bhattacharya.ankan1987@gmail.com

Abstract

In this article, an extremely wideband, isolation-enhanced, low-profile “Multiple-Input-Multiple-Output” (MIMO) antenna along with dual-band-notched features has been investigated. The antenna proposed herein, possesses two mutually orthogonal staircase-etched radiators for achieving a wide bandwidth. The radiating elements are placed mutually perpendicular in order to achieve polarization diversity and high isolation, i.e. for minimization of mutual coupling effect between adjacent radiating elements. The antenna exhibits an extremely wide frequency bandwidth covering 1.2–19.4 GHz except two frequency band notches centered at 3.5 and 5.5 GHz, respectively, originated due to the incorporation of a “Rectangular Complementary Split Ring Resonator (RCSRR)” structure and by etching dual “L-shaped” slits in the ground plane. The center frequency of the notched bands is adjusted by fine tuning of the dimensions of the incorporated band-notching structures. Isolation level (S21) better than −20 dB has been obtained due to the insertion of a “T-shaped” parasitic element as a decoupling structure. A prototype of the proposed antenna having dimension of 20 mm × 20 mm (0.08 λo × 0.08 λo) is fabricated and the antenna responses have been measured. Obtained results show that the miniaturized MIMO diversity antenna is undoubtedly a capable contender for communications supporting an extremely wide impedance bandwidth along with band-notched features for WLAN and WiMAX.

Type
Antenna Design, Modelling and Measurements
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Mak, A, Rowell, C and Murch, R (2008) Isolation enhancement between two closely packed antennas. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 56, 34113419.Google Scholar
2.Li, Z, Du, Z, Takahashi, M, Saito, K and Ito, K (2012) Reducing mutual coupling of MIMO antennas with parasitic elements for mobile terminals. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 60, 473481.Google Scholar
3.Khan, M, Capobianco, A, Najam, A, Shoaib, I, Autizi, E and Shafique, M (2014) Compact ultra-wideband diversity antenna with a floating parasitic digitated decoupling structure. IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation 8, 747753.Google Scholar
4.Zhang, S, Ying, Z, Xiong, J and He, S (2009) Ultrawideband MIMO/diversity antennas with a tree-like structure to enhance wideband isolation. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 8, 12791282.Google Scholar
5.Ren, J, Hu, W, Yin, Y and Fan, R (2014) Compact printed MIMO antenna for UWB applications. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 13, 15171520.Google Scholar
6.Chacko, B, Augustin, G and Denidni, T (2013) Uniplanar polarisation diversity antenna for ultra wideband systems. Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation 7, 854857.Google Scholar
7.Gao, P, He, S, Wei, X, Xu, Z, Wang, N and Zheng, Y (2014) Compact printed UWB diversity slot antenna with 5.5 GHz band-notched characteristics. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 13, 376379.Google Scholar
8.Lee, J, Kim, K, Ryu, H and Woo, J (2012) A compact ultra wideband MIMO antenna with WLAN band-rejected operation for mobile devices. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 11, 990993.Google Scholar
9.Toktas, A (2017) G-shaped band-notched ultra-wideband MIMO antenna system for mobile terminals. IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation 11, 718725.Google Scholar
10.Li, J, Chu, Q, Li, Z and Xia, X (2013) Compact dual band-notched UWB MIMO antenna with high isolation. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 61, 47594766.Google Scholar
11.Liu, L, Cheung, S and Yuk, T (2015) Compact MIMO antenna for portable UWB applications with band-notched characteristic. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 63, 19171924.Google Scholar
12.Cho, YJ, Kim, KH, Choi, DH, Lee, SS and Park, SO (2006) A miniature UWB planar monopole antenna with 5.0 GHz band-rejection filter and the time-domain characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 54, 14531460.Google Scholar
13.Jan, J and Kao, J (2007) Novel printed wideband rhombus like slot antenna with an offset microstrip fed line. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 06, 249251.Google Scholar
14.Toktas, A and Akdagli, A (2014) Wideband MIMO antenna with enhanced isolation for LTE, WiMAX and WLAN mobile handsets. Electronics Letters 50, 723724.Google Scholar
15.Rehman, SU, Sheta, AFA and Alkanhal, MAS (2011) Compact bandpass filters with bandwidth control using Defected Ground Structure (DGS). Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society (ACES) Journal 26, 624630.Google Scholar
16.Najam, A, Duroc, Y and Tedjini, S (2012) Multiple-input multiple-output antennas for ultra wideband communications. IntechOpen 10, 209236.Google Scholar