Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T19:57:31.200Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A new technique for SBAS availability improvement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2012

Boriana Vassileva  and
Boris Vassilev
Boriana Vassileva*
Affiliation:
Institute for Information and Communication Technologies, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria. Phone: +359029796620
Boris Vassilev
Affiliation:
Technical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
*
Corresponding author: B. Vassileva Email: bvassil@bas.bg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To protect a worst-case user, Satellite-Based Augmentation System (SBAS) transmits inflated integrity information for protection level computation. In this work, a novel user-based technique for autonomous protection level computation is proposed. Its quality is examined over Key Performance Indicators tests for integrity and availability using real European Geostationary Navigation Overlay Service (EGNOS) data. The accomplished experiments confirm that this technique allows significant availability improvement without breaches of the integrity.

Keywords

SBASProtection LevelsIntegrityAvailability
Type
Research Papers
Information
International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies , Volume 4 , Special Issue 2: Special issue on Surveillance Systems for Air Navigation Services , April 2012 , pp. 217 - 221
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Walter, T.; Blanch, J.; Enge, P.; Pervan, B.; Gratton, L.: Shaping aviation integrity – two RAIMs for Safety. GPS World, 19 (4) (2008), 42–49.Google Scholar
[2]Azaola-Sáenz, M.; Cosmen-Schortmann, J.: Autonomous integrity. An error isotropy-based approach for multiple fault conditions. Inside GNSS, 4 (1) (2009), 28–36.Google Scholar
[3]Kang, E.: Radar System Analysis, Design and Simulation, Artech House Inc., Boston/London, 2008.Google Scholar
[4]Roturier, B.; Chatre, E.; Ventura-Traveset, J.: The SBAS integrity concept standardised by ICAO. Application to EGNOS, in ESA, EGNOS for Professionals, Publications, GNSS Conf., May 2001.Google Scholar
[5]Ober, P.B.; Farnworth, R.; Breeuver, E.; van Willigen, D.: SBAS integrity verification, in Proc. ION GPS, 2001, 1805–1812.Google Scholar
[6]Radio Technical Committee for Aeronautics, Minimum Operational Performance Standards for Airborne Equipment Using Global Positioning System/Wide Area Augmentation System (RTCA/DO-229). Up to version D, December 2006.Google Scholar
[7]Suddapalli, R.: Aircraft position integrity for Differential Satellite-based Navigation in the presence of both bias and noise errors. MA thesis, Ohio University, 2004, 1–79.Google Scholar
[8]De Cleene, B.: Defining pseudorange integrity-overbounding, in Proc. ION GPS-2000, Salt Lake City, Utah, September 2000, 19–22.Google Scholar
[9]Vassileva, B.; Vassilev, B.: EGNOS performance analysis and a novel algorithm for system's performance improvement, in Proc. 16th Int. Conf. Integrated Navigation Systems, Saint Petersburg, Russia, May 2009, 342–350.Google Scholar
[10]Kaplan, E.; Hegarty, Ch.: Understanding GPS. Principles and Applications, Artech House Inc., Boston/London, 2006.Google Scholar
[11]Oliveira, J.; Tiberius, C.: Quality control in SBAS: protection levels and reliability levels. J. Nav., 62 (2009), 509–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Caccioppoli, N.; Chirita, A.; Duchet, D.: Validating PEGASUS in support of EGNOS certification. http://www.enc-gnss09.it/proceedingsPDF/D3b/2_D3b.PDF, 2009, 1–8.Google Scholar