Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:38:21.855Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Novel monopole antenna on a single AMC cell for low SAR

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2020

G. Bulla ,
A. A. de Salles  and
C. Fernández-Rodríguez Open the ORCID record for C. Fernández-Rodríguez [Opens in a new window]
G. Bulla
Affiliation:
Electrical Engineering Department, UFRGS-Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, P. Alegre, RS, Brazil
A. A. de Salles
Affiliation:
Electrical Engineering Department, UFRGS-Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, P. Alegre, RS, Brazil
C. Fernández-Rodríguez*
Affiliation:
IFRS, Federal Institute for Education, Science and Technology of Rio Grande do Sul, Canoas, RS, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: C. Fernández-Rodríguez, E-mail: claudio.fernandez@canoas.ifrs.edu.br
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The design, simulations, and optimized results for a novel low specific absorption rate (SAR) monopole antenna on a single artificial magnetic conductor (AMC) cell are described in this paper. Simulated results show a reduction close to 70% in the 1 g ps SAR for the developed monopole antenna with the AMC in comparison to the monopole antenna without AMC. This allows higher radiation efficiency, battery drain reduction as well as mobile terminal user health risks reduction.

Keywords

Specific absorption rateSAR reductionartificial magnetic conductorprinted antennas
Type
Research Paper
Information
International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies , Volume 12 , Special Issue 9: EuMCE 2019 Special Issue (Part I) , November 2020 , pp. 825 - 830
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

de Salles, AA, Bulla, G and Rodriguez, CEF (2006) Electromagnetic absorption in the heads of adults and children due to mobile phone operation close to the head. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine 25, 349–360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gandhi, OP, Lazzi, G and Furse, CM (1996) Electromagnetic absorption in the human head and neck for mobile telephones at 835 and 1900 MHz. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 44, 1884–1897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandhi, OP, Morgan, LL, de Salles, AA, Han, YY, Herberman, RB and Davis, DL (2012) Exposure limits: the underestimation of absorbed cell phone radiation, especially in children. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine 31, 34–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) (1998) Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz), international commission on non-ionizing radiation protection. Health Physics 74, 494–522.Google Scholar
IEEE standard for safety levels with respect to human exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz, IEEE Standard C95.1-1991, 2005.Google Scholar
Federal Communications Committee (FCC) and Office of Engineering and Technology (2001) Evaluating compliance with FCC guidelines for human exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields, additional information for evaluating compliance of mobile and portable devices with FCC limits for human exposure to radiofrequency emissions. Supplement C (Ed. 01-01) to OET Bulletin 65 (Ed. 97-01).Google Scholar
Agence Nationale des Fréquences (2018) ANFR webpage [Online] Available at http://data.anfr.fr/explore/dataset/dastelephoniemobile/?disjunctive.marque&disjunctive.modele&sort=marque.Google Scholar
Hardell, L and Carlberg, M (2015) Mobile phone and cordless phone use and the risk for glioma – analysis of pooled case-control studies in Sweden, 1997–2003 and 2007–2009. Pathophysiology 22, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
INTERPHONE Study Group (2010) Brain tumour risk in relation to mobile telephone use: results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study. International Journal of Epidemiology 39, 675–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coureau, G, Bouvier, G, Lebailly, P, Fabbro-Peray, P, Gruber, A, Leffondre, K, Guillamo, JS, Loiseau, H, Mathoulin-Pélissier, S, Salamon, R and Baldi, I (2014) Mobile phone use and brain tumours in the CERENAT case-control study. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 71, 514–522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sadetzki, S, Chetrit, A, Jarus-Hakak, A, Cardis, E, Deutch, Y, Duvdevani, S, Zultan, A, Novikov, I, Freedman, L and Wolf, M (2008) Cellular phone use and risk of benign and malignant parotid gland tumors – a nationwide case-control study. American Journal of Epidemiology 167, 457–467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WHO/IARC Working Group (2011) Carcinogenicity of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. The Lancet Oncology 12, 624–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) (2013) IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. In: Non-ionization Radiation, Part 2: Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields, vol. 102. IARC Press, Lyon, France, p. 406.Google Scholar
Bankro, M (2016) Investigation of Mobile Phone SAR Reduction (Dr. Ing. dissertation). Universität Duisburg-Essen, URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:464-20160830-080459-5 DuEPublico ID: 41990; Library shelfmark YDA2032.Google Scholar
Laila, D, Sujith, R, Nair, SM, Aanandan, CK, Vasudevan, K and Mohanan, P (2011) Modified CPW fed monopole antenna with a radiation pattern suitable for mobile handset. International Conference on Communications and Signal Processing, pp. 370–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, Y and Roblin, C (2012) Multislot antenna with a screening backplane for UWB WBAN applications. International Journal of Antennas and Propagation 2012, 1–12.Google Scholar
Ma, KP, Hirose, K, Yang, FR, Qian, Y and Itoh, T (1998) Realization of magnetic conducting surface using novel photonic bandgap structure. Electronics Letters 34, 2041–2042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goussetis, G, Feresidis, A and Vardaxoglou, J (2006) Tailoring the AMC and EBG characteristic of periodic metallic arrays printed on grounded dielectric substrate. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 54, 82–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, F and Rahmat-Samii, Y (2003) Reflection phase characterizations of the EBG ground plane for low profile wire antenna applications. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 51, 2691–2703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamardin, K, Rahim, MKA, Hall, PS, Samsuri, NA, Jalil, ME and Ayop, O (2013) Textile artificial magnetic conductor waveguide sheet with monopole antennas for body centric communication. 7th Eur. Conf. on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), pp. 366–370.Google Scholar
Broas, R, Sivenpiper, D and Yablonovitch, E (2001) A high-impedance ground plane applied to a cellphone handset geometry. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 49, 1262–1265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, JN and Chen, FC (2006) Reduction of the peak SAR in the human head with metamaterials. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 54, 3763–3770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwak, SI, Sim, DU, Kwon, JH and Choi, HD (2008) Experimental tests of SAR reduction on mobile phone using EBG structures. Electronics Letters 44, 568–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raad, H, Abbosh, A, Al-Rizzo, H and Rucker, D (2013) Flexible and compact AMC based antenna for telemedicine application. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 61, 524–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwak, SI, Sim, DU, Kwon, JH and Yoon, YJ (2017) Design of PIFA with metamaterials for body-SAR reduction in wearable applications. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility 59, 297–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, F and Rahmat-Samii, Y: (2009) Electromagnetic band gap structures in antenna engineering [ref. Electromagnetic Band Gap Structures in Antenna Engineering, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rushingabigwi, G and Sun, L (2015) Design of an 868 MHz printed S-shape monopole antenna. Journal of Computer and Communications 3, 49–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Rodríguez, C, de Salles, AA and Davis, DL (2015) Dosimetric simulations of brain absorption of mobile phone radiation – the relationship between psSAR and age. IEEE Access 3, 2425–2430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar