Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T08:52:28.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A performance comparison of CDA and ICDA in ADRP

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 June 2013

Sathya Sathiskumar*
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Anna University Coimbatore, Coimbatore-47, India
*
Corresponding author: S. Sathiskumar Email: msathya15@gmail.com

Abstract

Broadcasting is an inevitable operation in networks. This paper addresses the issues related to broadcasting such as node interference and latency delay in ad-hoc networks .These problems could be overcome by our proposed algorithm approximate directional routing protocol (ADRP) which is mainly inspired by the existing on-demand directional routing protocol (DRP). DRP is also similar to Dynamic Source Routing (DSR). The use of directional antennas for broadcasting is gaining acceptance in ad-hoc networks. The key benefits of smart antennas are minimum energy consumption and bandwidth conservation. Although excess of literature is directed toward the use of smart antennas, a powerful protocol for reducing redundancy, end-to-end delay, and interference is being researched. One such protocol is ADRP. ADRP is a reactive protocol that combines the effect of DRP and approximation algorithm that finds optimal solution for broadcast problems. Omni-directional antennas are capable of wide angle signal transmission. Compared with omni-directional antennas, its successor directional antennas have come up with significant advantages of reducing packet redundancy and interference by gaining higher signal-to-noise ratio. The duo pack will considerably decrease end-to-end delay and node interference giving out significant performance benefits thereby substantially increasing throughput.

Type
Tutorial and Review Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Gossain, H.; Joshi, T.: De Morais, Cordeiro C.; Agarwal, D.P.: DRP: An efficient directional routing protocol for mobile ad-hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, Vol. 17, No. 12, pp. 14381541, December 2006.Google Scholar
[2]Ramanathan, R.: On the performance of Ad Hoc networks with beam forming antennas, Proc. ACM MobiHoc, pp. 95105, October 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Gandhi, R.; Kim, Y.-A.; Lee, S.; Ryu, J.; Wan, P.-J.: Approximation algorithm for data broadcast in wireless networks. IEEE Trans. on mobile computing, 11 (7) (2012), 12371248.Google Scholar
[4]Hu, C.; Hong, Y.; Hou, J.: On mitigating the broadcast storm problem with directional antennas, Proc. IEEE Int'l Comm Conf. (ICC), pp. 148161, 2003.Google Scholar
[5]Huang, S.; wan, P.; Jia, X.; Du, H.; shang, W.: Minimum-latency broadcast scheduling in wireless ad-hoc networks, in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, pp. 733739, 2007.Google Scholar
[6]Gandhi, R.; Mishra, A.; Parthasarathy, S.: Minimizing broadcast latency and redundancy in mobile ad-hoc networks, IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking, 16(4) (2008), 840851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Huang, S.C.H.; Du, H.; Park, E.-K.: Minimum latency gossiping in multi-hop wireless networks, Proc. Acm Mobittoc, 2008, 323330.Google Scholar