Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:42:02.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Probe-corrected near-field to far-field transformation using multiple spherical wave expansions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2020

Fernando Rodríguez Varela*
Affiliation:
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Av. Complutense no. 30, Madrid, Spain
Belén Galocha Iragüen
Affiliation:
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Av. Complutense no. 30, Madrid, Spain
Manuel Sierra Castañer
Affiliation:
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Av. Complutense no. 30, Madrid, Spain
*
Author for correspondence: Fernando Rodríguez Varela, E-mail: f.rodriguez@upm.es

Abstract

Near-field to far-field transformations constitute a powerful antenna characterization technique for near-field measurement scenarios. In this paper, a near-field to far-field transformation technique based on multiple spherical wave expansions (SWEs) is presented. Thanks to its iterative matrix inversion nature, the approach performs the transformation of fields measured on arbitrary surfaces. Also, irregular sampling schemes can be incorporated. The proposed algorithm is based on modeling the antenna fields with not one, but several SWEs distributed over its geometry. Due to the high number of SWEs, their truncation number can be arbitrarily reduced. Working with expansions of low order allows us to incorporate the probe correction in the transformation in a very simple way, accepting any type of probe and orientation. Only the probe far-field pattern is used, thus working with its full SWE is avoided. The algorithm is validated using simulated field data as well as measurements of real antennas.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Breinbjerg, O (2016) Spherical near-field antenna measurements – the most accurate antenna measurement technique, IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation, Puerto Rico, pp. 10191020, June 2016.Google Scholar
Hatzis, J, Pelland, P and Hindman, G (2016) Implementation of a combination planar and spherical near-field antenna measurement system using an industrial 6-axis robot, AMTA 2016 Proceedings, Austin, TX, USA, 2016, pp. 16.Google Scholar
Fernandez, MG, Lopez, YA and Andres, FL (2018) On the use of unmanned aerial vehicles for antenna and coverage diagnostics in mobile networks. IEEE Communications Magazine 56, 7278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittmann, RC, Alpert, BK and Francis, MH (2004) Near-field, spherical scanning antenna measurements with nonideal probe locations. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 52, 21842187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Agostino, F, Ferrara, F, Gennarelli, C, Guerriero, R and Migliozzi, M (2017) Fast and accurate far-field prediction by using a reduced number of bipolar measurements. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 16, 29392942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Agostino, F, Ferrara, F, Gennarelli, C, Gennarelli, G, Guerriero, R and Migliozzi, M (2012) On the direct non-redundant near-field-to-far-field transformation in a cylindrical scanning geometry. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine 54, 130138.10.1109/MAP.2012.6202525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Agostino, F, Ferrara, F, Gennarelli, C, Guerriero, R and Migliozzi, M (2013) Non-redundant spherical NF – FF transformations using ellipsoidal antenna modeling: experimental assessments [measurements corner]. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine 55, 166175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarkar, TK and Taaghol, A (1999) Near-field to near/far-field transformation for arbitrary near-field geometry utilizing an equivalent electric current and MoM. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 47, 566573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farouq, M, Serhir, M and Picard, D (2016) Antenna far-field assessment from near-field measured over arbitrary surfaces. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 64, 51225130.10.1109/TAP.2016.2623858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chou, H, Pathak, PH, Tuan, S and Burkholder, RJ (2017) A novel far-field transformation via complex source beams for antenna near-field measurements on arbitrary surfaces. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 65, 72667279.10.1109/TAP.2017.2758420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, JE (1988) Spherical Near-Field Antenna Measurements. London, UK: Peter Peregrinus.10.1049/PBEW026ECrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornelius, R and Heberling, D (2017) Correction of non-ideal probe orientations for spherical near-field antenna measurements, AMTA 2017 Proceedings, Atlanta, GA, pp. 15.Google Scholar
Saad, Y. (2003) Iterative Methods for Sparse Linear Systems, 2nd Edn. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.10.1137/1.9780898718003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, WM and Paris, DT (1973) Probe-compensated near-field measurements on a cylinder. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation AP-21, 435445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SNIFT Software, TICRA, Copenhagen, Denmark. Available at http://www.ticra.com.Google Scholar