Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:40:32.273Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Single layer miniaturized ultra-thin FSS with five closely spaced bands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2019

Anupam Dey*
Affiliation:
Calcutta Institute of Technology, NH6, Banitabla, Uluberia, Howrah, West Bengal 711316, India
Rajarshi Sanyal
Affiliation:
MCKV Institute of engineering, 243, G T Road North, Liluah, Howrah, West Bengal 711204, India
*
Author for correspondence: Anupam Dey, E-mail: anupam.dey107@gmail.com

Abstract

This Paper reveals a novel single layer five band frequency selective surface (FSS). Novelties of the proposed FSS lie in its five closely spaced stop bands at 2.4, 3.38, 4.82, 6.32, and 7.75 GHz as well as the reduced single layer structural thickness (0.0016 λ0) and the miniaturized unit cell size (0.0656 λ0) at lower resonant frequency as compared to the existing multiband FSS. The unit cell structure consists of six octagonal concentric interconnected loops. Adjacent loop interconnection technique reduces the cell size by more than 44%. Furthermore, arrow-shaped rings are also introduced on each corner of the outermost octagonal loop, and using this technique approximate 23% cell miniaturization can be achieved. In addition, the proposed FSS exhibits excellent angular stability.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Munk, BA (2005) Frequency Selective Surfaces: Theory and Design. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
2.Li, H and Cao, Q (2015) Design and analysis of a controllable miniaturized tri-band frequency selective surface. Progress in Electromagnetics Research Letters 52, 105112.Google Scholar
3.Wang, DS, Chang, YM, Che, WQ, Chin, KS and Chow, YL (2013) A low-profile frequency selective surface with controllable triband characteristics. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 12, 468471.Google Scholar
4.Liu, N, Sheng, XJ, Fan, JJ and Guo, D (2017) A miniaturized tri-band frequency selective surface based on convoluted design. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 62, 1722.Google Scholar
5.Doken, B and Kartal, M (2016) Triple band frequency selective surface design for global system for mobile communication systems. IET Microwave Antennas Propagation 10, 11541158.Google Scholar
6.Li, Y, Li, L, Zhang, Y and Zhao, C (2015) Design and synthesis of multilayer frequency selective surface based on antenna-filter-antenna using Minkowski fractal structures. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 63, 133141.Google Scholar
7.Yan, M, Wang, J, Ma, H, Qu, S, Zhang, J, Xu, C, Zheng, L and Zhang, A (2016) A quad-band frequency selective surface with highly selective characteristics. IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters 26, 562564.Google Scholar
8.Rahmati, B and Hassani, HR (2015) Multi-band metallic frequency selective surface with wide range of band ratio. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 63, 37473753.Google Scholar
9.Fabian-Gongora, H, Martynyuk, AE, Rodriguez-Cuevas, J and Martinez-Lopez, JI (2015) Active dual-band frequency selective surfaces with close band spacing based on switchable ring slots. IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters 25, 606608.Google Scholar
10.Fabian-Gongora, H, Martynyuk, AE, Rodriguez-Cuevas, J and Martinez-Lopez, JI (2016) Closely spaced tri-band frequency selective surfaces based on split ring slots. Electronics letters 52, 727729.Google Scholar
11.Unaldı, S, Cimen, S, Cakır, G and Ayten, UE (2017) A novel dual band ultra-thin FSS with closely settled frequency response. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 16, 13811384.Google Scholar
12.Parker, EA, Robertson, J-B, Sanz-Izquierdo, B and Batchelor, JC (2008) Minimal size FSS for long wavelength operation. IET Electronics Letters 44, 394395.Google Scholar
13.Sivasamy, R and Kanagasabai, M (2015) A novel dual-band angular independent FSS with closely spaced frequency response. IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters 25, 298300.Google Scholar
14.Ghosh, S and Srivastava, KV (2017) An angularly stable dual-band FSS with closely spaced resonances using miniaturized unit cell. IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters 27, 218220.Google Scholar
15.Wdew, AH, Riaz, L, Naeem, U and Shafique, MF (2017) A compact band-stop frequency selective surface for dual band Wi-Fi applications. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters 59, 19201927.Google Scholar
16.Kartal, M, Golezani, JJ and Doken, B (2017) A triple band frequency selective surface design for GSM systems by utilizing a novel synthetic resonator. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 65, 27242727.Google Scholar
17.Ramezani Varkani, A, Hossein Firouzeh, Z and Zeidaabadi Nezhad, A (2018) Equivalent circuit model for array of circular loop FSS structures at oblique angles of incidence. IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation 12, 749755.Google Scholar
18.Langley, RJ and Parker, EA (1982) Equivalent circuit model for arrays of squareloops. Electronics Letters 18, 294296.Google Scholar
19.Jha, KR, Singh, G and Jyoti, R (2012) A Simple Synthesis technique of Single layer square-loop Frequency selective Surface. Progress in Electromagnetics Research B 45, 165185.Google Scholar
20.Yang, J and Shen, Z (2007) A thin and broadband absorber using double-square loops. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 6, 388391.Google Scholar
21.Langley, RJ and Drinkwater, AJ (1982) Improved empirical model for the Jerusalem cross. Microwave, Antennas and Propagation, IEE Proceeding H 129, 16.Google Scholar
22.Cimen, S (2013) Novel closely spaced planar dual-band frequency-selective surface. IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation 7, 894899.Google Scholar