Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:51:18.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How Has the Field of Middle East Studies Changed in the Last Five Years? An IJMES Retrospective

Pensée 1: From the Catbird Seat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2010

Judith E. Tucker*
Affiliation:
History Department, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C.; e-mail: tuckerje@georgetown.edu

Extract

As editor of IJMES from 2004 to 2009, I spent the last five years in the catbird seat of Middle East studies, where I had the privilege of reading well over 500 article submissions that flowed into the editorial office, some 100 of which were ultimately destined for publication. I characterize the experience as very gratifying on the whole; ours is a field that has attracted talented and skilled scholars who are doing some very creative work—this is not a change per se, although it can be argued that we have a new generation involved in increasingly more theoretically informed projects. Have there been other, more tangible, developments in the field as reflected in submissions to IJMES? I mention four trends I have spotted over time that may suggest some of the recent shifts—in region, topic, scope, and critical engagement—in research foci.

Type
Quick Studies
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)