Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:19:11.203Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

OUTSOURCING: ENERGY AND EMPIRE IN THE AGE OF COAL, 1820–1911

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2015

On Barak
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

During the long 19th century, British coal proliferated throughout the Ottoman Empire in increasing quantity, rapidity, and regularity via junctions and political arrangements that became evermore stable and dominant. The British used coal export to project their power elsewhere, offshoring the Industrial Revolution by building an infrastructure that could support it overseas and connect it to existing facets of the imperial project. Examining this “outsourcing” and the importance of foreign coal markets to industrialization helps provincialize the steam engine and anchor it in a global context. It also allows us to explore the impact of fossil energy on the Middle East and the ways coal both set the stage for the arrival of oil and informed the possibilities for translating carbon power into politics. Coal, the article suggests, animated political participation in England while reinforcing authoritarian tendencies in the Middle East.

Type
Articles
Information
International Journal of Middle East Studies , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , August 2015 , pp. 425 - 445
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

Author's note: I am indebted to the anonymous referees for IJMES and to its editor, Akram Khater, and managing editor, Jeffrey Culang, for their incisive comments. I thank my research assistants, Alaaddin Tok, Nimrod Ben Zeev, and Ran Levy. I am grateful to Timothy Mitchell, Liat Kozma, and Avner Wishnitzer for reading drafts of this article. Research was made possible by a Marie Skłodowska Curie fellowship and by funding from the Israel Science Foundation.

1 Defoe, Daniel, A Tour thro' the Whole Island of Great Britain Divided into Circuits or Journeys (London: Birt, S., Osborne, T., Browne, D., Hodges, J., Osborn, J., Miller, A. and Robinson, J., 1748), 220Google Scholar.

2 Jaffe, James A., The Struggle for Market Power: Industrial Relations in the British Coal Industry, 1800–1840 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), 26CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Ibid., 28.

4 Podobnik, Bruce, Global Energy Shifts: Fostering Sustainability in a Turbulent Age (Philadelphia, Pa.: Temple University Press, 2006), 31Google Scholar.

5 Jones, Christopher F., Routes of Power: Energy and Modern America (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Barak, On, On Time: Technology and Temporality in Modern Egypt (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 2013), chap. 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Headrick's, DanielThe Tools of Empire: Technology and European Imperialism in the Nineteenth Century (New York: Oxford University Press, 1981)Google Scholar and Adas', MichaelMachines as the Measure of Men: Science, Technology, and Ideologies of Western Dominance (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1989)Google Scholar are the usual suspects. For a recent critique of this literature's approach to steamships, see, for example, Crews, Robert, “Trafficking in Evil? The Global Arms Trade and the Politics of Disorder,” in Global Muslims in the Age of Steam and Print, ed. Gelvin, James L. and Green, Nile (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 2014), 121–43Google Scholar.

8 Mitchell, Timothy, Carbon Democracy: Political Power in the Age of Oil (London: Verso, 2011), 18–29Google Scholar.

9 On the “resource curse” and its debunking, see Mitchell, Carbon Democracy.

10 Since the 1970s, Immanuel Wallerstein's model of World-Systems theory has been adopted and nuanced in Ottoman and Middle Eastern historiography. See Islamoǧlu, Huri and Keyder, Çaǧlar, “Agenda for Ottoman History,” Review (Fernand Braudel Center) 1.1 (1977): 31–55Google Scholar; Owen, Roger, The Middle East in the World Economy, 1800–1914 (New York: Methuen, 1981)Google Scholar; İslamoĝlu-İnan, Huri, ed., The Ottoman Empire and the World-Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987)Google Scholar; and Pamuk, Şevket, The Ottoman Empire and European Capitalism, 1820–1913 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987)Google Scholar. Pomeranz's, KennethThe Great Divergence: China, Europe and the Making of the Modern World Economy (Princeton N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2000)Google Scholar proposes a “global” explanation for divergence and dependence that is partially traceable to World-Systems theory. Pomeranz, however, omits the Ottoman Empire and the Middle East from the “global” framework he studies. Later works have addressed this lacuna but have not yet addressed fossil fuels, focusing instead on other energy sources. See Pomeranz, The Great Divergence; and Mikhail, Alan, “Unleashing the Beast: Animals, Energy, and the Economy of Labor in Ottoman Egypt,” The American Historical Review 118 (2013): 319CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Building on Pomeranz and expanding his perspective to include noneconomic factors for explaining the (far less stark) rise of the West, Christopher Bayly offers a decentring critique of Marxist and Wallersteinian historiography, stressing global uniformity, similarity, and at times cooperation rather than center-periphery hierarchy. See The Birth of the Modern World 1780–1914: Global Connections and Comparisons (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2004). However, collaboration and similarity can arguably result in very different outcomes, as I show at the end of this article.

11 Jevons, W. Stanley, The Coal Question (London: Macmillan and Co., 1866), 260–61Google Scholar.

12 Harlaftis, Galina, A History of Greek-Owned Shipping: The Making of an International Tramp Fleet, 1830 to the Present Day (London: Routledge, 1995), 22Google Scholar.

13 W. Stanley Jevons, The Coal Question, 265, 278.

14 Ibid., 253.

15 Aksan, Virginia H., Ottoman Wars 1700–1870: An Empire Besieged (Harlow, England: Pearson Longman, 2007), 129–79, 214–58Google Scholar.

16 Mikhail, “Unleashing the Beast,” 317–48.

17 Dakin, Douglas, The Greek Struggle for Independence, 1821–1833 (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1973), 169–70Google Scholar.

18 Ibid.

19 MacFarlane, Charles, Constantinople in 1828: A Residence of Sixteen Months in the Turkish Capital and Provinces (London: Saunders and Otley, 1829), 353Google Scholar. For the history of the Swift, see Bal, Nurcan, “İlk Buharlı Gemimiz Buğ Gemisi,” Yedikita 31 (2011): 18–24Google Scholar. On the battle of Navarino, hailed as the last great battle of the age of sail, see Woodhouse, C. M., The Battle of Navarino (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1965)Google Scholar; Clogg, Richard, A Concise History of Greece, 3rd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013 [1992]), 39–41, 44CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Koliopoulos, John S. and Veremis, Thanos M., Modern Greece: A History since 1821 (Chichester: Wiley–Blackwell, 2010), 24Google Scholar; Aksan, Ottoman Wars; Chesterman, Simon, Just War or Just Peace?: Humanitarian Intervention and International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), 28–32Google ScholarPubMed; and Rodogno, David, Against Massacre: Humanitarian Interventions in the Ottoman Empire, 1815–1914 (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2012), 83–84Google Scholar.

20 Quataert, Donald, Miners and the State in the Ottoman Empire: The Zonguldak Coalfield, 1822–1920 (New York: Berghahn Books, 2006), 9–18Google Scholar.

21 On Ottoman mining before the 19th century, see Tok, Alaaddin, The Ottoman Mining Sector in the Age of Capitalism: An Analysis of State-Capital Relations (1850–1908) (Saarbrücken: Lambert Academic Publishing, 2011), 11–17Google Scholar.

22 The Ottoman transition from sail to steam allowed for increased intervention of the United States in the Mediterranean. See Yener, Emir, From the Sail to the Steam: Naval Modernization in the Ottoman, Russian, Chinese and Japanese Empires 1830–1905 (Saarbrücken: Lambert Academic Publishing, 2010), 65–69Google Scholar; and Bal, Nurcen, XIX. Yüzyılda Osmanlı Bahriyesi'nde Gemi İnşa Teknolojisinde Deĝişim: Buharlı Gemiler Dönemi (master's thesis, Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University, 2010), 16–18Google Scholar.

23 Taylor, Richard Cowling, Statistics of Coal: The Geographical and Geological Distribution of Fossil Fuel (Philadelphia, Pa.: J. W. Moore, 1848), 631–32Google Scholar.

24 Bruce Podobnik, Global Energy Shifts, 22.

25 W. Stanley Jevons, The Coal Question, 248.

26 Sangwan, Satpal, “The Sinking Ships: Colonial Policy and the Decline of Indian Shipping, 1735–1835,” in Technology and the Raj: Western Technology and Technical Transfers to India, 1700–1947, ed. MacLeod, Roy and Kumar, Deepak (New Delhi: Sage, 1995), 144Google Scholar.

27 Emir Yener, From the Sail to the Steam, 88–93.

28 See ibid., 74–79. Yener's description does not go into detail regarding the move to acquisitions, but from the details of the ships making up the Ottoman fleet, as well as from archival documents, it is possible to discern that it took place circa 1847. See, for example, Başbakanlık Osmanlı Arşivi (BOA), Sadaret Mektubi Kalemi Meclis-i Vala Evrakı (A.MKT.MVL) 2/2 (1262 [1846]). Another context for the shift was the 1838 Balta Limanı treaty signed with Britain. Reşat Kasaba has referred to the treaty, along with the subsequent beginning of the Tanzimat reforms, as “‘capping’ the changes that had started with the incorporation of the Ottoman Empire into the world-economy after the 1750s.” See Kasaba, Reşat, “Open-Door Treaties: China and the Ottoman Empire Compared,” New Perspectives on Turkey 7 (1992): 73–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29 BOA, A.MKT.MVL 74/26 (1271 [1854]), 28.

30 Dursun, Selçuk, Forest and the State: History of Forestry and Forest Administration in the Ottoman Empire (PhD dissertation, Sabanci University, 2007), 7Google Scholar.

31 Ibrahim, Muhammad Mahmud, Iktishaf al-Fahm fi Misr (Cairo: Matbaʿat Costa Thomas wa-Shurakaʾihi, 1957)Google Scholar; Allah, Muhammad Fathi ʿAwad, Qissat al-Fahm fi Misr (Dar al-Kitab al-ʿArabi li-l-Tibaʿa wa-l-Nashr, Cairo, 1968)Google Scholar.

32 Mikhail, Alan, Nature and Empire in Ottoman Egypt: An Environmental History (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33 Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, vol. 14 (Philadelphia, Pa.: M'Calla and Stavely, 1876), 243; Richard Cowling Taylor, Statistics of Coal, 623; Long, J. G., “Foreign Markets for American Coal,” in United States Bureau of Foreign Commerce, Special Consular Reports, vol. 21 (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1900), 272Google Scholar; Timbs, John, The Year-Book of Facts in Science and Art (London: David Bogue, 1850), 265Google Scholar.

34 BOA, Sadaret Mektubi Mühimme Kalemi Evrakı (A.MKT.MHM) 305/7 (1281 [1864]), S1.

35 Alan Mikhail, Nature and Empire, 165–67.

36 Burford, Robert, Description of a View of the Bombardment of St. Jean D'Acre (London: Geo. Nichols, 1841), 2–4Google Scholar.

37 Gencer, Ali İhsan, Türk Denizcilik Tarihi Araştırmaları (Istanbul: Türkiye Denizciler Sendikası, 1986), 23–24Google Scholar.

38 Hall, W. H. and Bernard, W. D., The Nemesis in China, 3rd ed. (London: Henry Colburn, 1846), 1Google Scholar.

39 Wise, Henry, An Analysis of One Hundred Voyages to and from India, China &c. (London: J. W. Norie and Co., 1839), xiv–xvGoogle Scholar.

40 Zvi Ben-Dor Benite, “Taking Abduh to China: Chinese-Egyptian Intellectual Contact in the Early Twentieth Century,” in Gelvin and Green, Global Muslims in the Age of Steam and Print, 249–69.

41 Hall, W. H. and Bernard, W. D., Narrative of the Voyages and Services of the Nemesis: From 1840 to 1843, vol. 2 (London: Henry Colburn, 1844), 423–24Google Scholar.

42 Wright, Tim, Coal Mining in China's Economy and Society, 1895–1937 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1984)Google Scholar.

43 Low, Michael Christopher, “Empire and the Hajj: Pilgrims, Plagues and Pan-Islam under British Surveillance,” International Journal of Middle East Studies 40 (2008): 269–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar; BOA, Meclis-i Vükela Mazbataları (MV), 74/92 (1310 [3 May 1893]).

44 For examples of coal depots established and later forsaken, see Dubois, Colette, “The Red Sea Ports during the Revolution in Transportation, 1800–1914,” in Modernity and Culture: From the Mediterranean to the Indian Ocean, ed. Fawaz, Leila Tarazi and Bayly, C.A. (New York: Columbia University Press, 2002), 58–74Google Scholar.

45 Blyth, Robert J., “Aden, British India and the Development of Steam Power in the Red Sea, 1825–1839,” in Maritime Empires: British Imperial Maritime Trade in the Nineteenth Century, ed. Killingray, David, Lincoln, Margarette, and Rigby, Nigel (Woodbridge: Boydell Press, 2004), 68Google Scholar.

46 See, for example, the fate of the short-lived depot on the Island of Socotra in Marston, Thomas E., Britain's Imperial Role in the Red Sea Area, 1800–1878 (Hamsden, Conn.: Shoe String Press, 1961), 475–76Google Scholar.

47 Farah, Caesar E., The Sultan's Yemen: 19th-Century Challenges to Ottoman Rule (London: I. B. Tauris, 2002), 1–14Google Scholar. On Yemen under Ottoman rule and British infringement, see also Kuehn, Thomas, Empire, Islam, and Politics of Difference: Ottoman Rule in Yemen, 1849–1919 (Leiden: Brill, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

48 BOA, Dahiliye Nezâreti Mektubî Kalemi (DH.MKT), 1619/8 (1306 [24 April, 1889]).

49 Blyth, “Aden, British India and the Development of Steam Power,” 72.

50 Marston, Britain's Imperial Role in the Red Sea Area, 122, 273, 329–30, 364, 366.

51 Taylor, Statistics of Coal, 622.

52 Blyth, “Aden, British India and the Development of Steam Power,” 73, 82.

53 Gencer, Türk Denizcilik Tarihi Araştırmaları, 13–32.

54 BOA, İrade Hariciye (İ.HR.) 335/21582 (1298 [27 March 1881]).

55 “Our dredging machines,” said de Lesseps in an 1870 lecture, “of which the ducts were one and a half times as long as the column in the Palace Vendome, carried off from two to three thousand cubic meters a-day; and as we had sixty of them, we succeeded in extracting monthly as much as two million cubic meters.” Lesseps, Ferdinand de, History of the Suez Canal: A Personal Narrative (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011 [1876]), 77Google Scholar.

56 Singh, Satyindra, Blueprint to Bluewater, the Indian Navy, 1951–1965 (New Delhi: Lancer International, 1992), 252Google Scholar.

57 Kirkaldy, Adam, British Shipping: Its History, Organisation and Importance (London: Kegan, Paul, Trench, Trübner and Co., 1914), 461–62Google Scholar.

58 Ibid.

59 Barak, On Time, chap. 1; House of Commons, Report from the Select Committee on Steam Navigation to India (1834), 42, 72, 224.

60 Graham, Gerald S., “The Ascendancy of the Sailing Ship, 1850–85,” Economic History Review, New Series 9 (1956): 74–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Foulke, Robert D., “Life in the Dying World of Sail, 1870–1910,” Journal of British Studies 3 (1963): 105–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Harley, C. Knick, “The Shift from Sailing Ships to Steamships, 1850–1890: A Study in Technological Change and its Diffusion,” in Essays on a Mature Economy: Britain after 1840, ed. McCloskey, Donald (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1971), 215–34Google Scholar; Harcourt, Freda, Flagships of Imperialism: The P&O Company and the Politics of Empire from Its Origins to 1867 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

61 House of Commons, Report from the Select Committee on Steam Navigation to India (1834), 104.

62 Blyth, “Aden, British India and the Development of Steam Power,” 73–4; Huber, Valeska, Channelling Mobilities: Migration and Globalisation in the Suez Canal Region and Beyond, 1869–1914 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), 119CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

63 Ibid.

64 Zimmerman, Erich W., “Why the Export Coal Business of America Should Be Built Up—III,” Coal Age 19 (1921): 18Google Scholar.

65 Ibid.

66 Jevons, Herbert Stanley, Foreign Trade in Coal (London: P. S. King & Son, 1909)Google Scholar.

67 For some examples of the various political, racial, technical, environmental, and economic dimensions of transitions to oil in various settings, see Sieferle, Rolf Peter, The Subterranean Forest: Energy Systems and the Industrial Revolution, trans. Osman, Michael (Cambridge: White Horse Press, 2001)Google Scholar; Podobnik, Global Energy Shifts; Vitalis, Robert, America's Kingdom: Mythmaking on the Saudi Oil Frontier (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2007)Google Scholar; Jones, Toby Craig, Desert Kingdom: How Oil and Water Forged Modern Saudi Arabia (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Smil, Vaclav, Energy Transition: History, Requirements, Prospects (Santa Barbara, Calif.: Praeger, 2010)Google Scholar; and Mitchell, Carbon Democracy.

68 Huber, Channelling Mobilities, 121–22.

69 BOA, Yıldız Sadaret Hususi Maruzat Evrakı (Y.A.HUS), 298/83 (1311 [1893]).

70 Beinin, Joel, Workers and Peasants in the Modern Middle East (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), 79CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Behar, Cem, A Neighborhood in Ottoman Istanbul: Fruit Vendors and Civil Servants in the Kasap İlyas Mahalle (Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press, 2003), 155–58Google Scholar.

71 W. Stanley Jevons, The Coal Question, 251.

72 BOA, Sadaret Mektubi Kalemi Evrakı (A.MKT.), 111/94 (1260 [1844]).

73 BOA, Sadaret Mektubi Kalemi Nezaret ve Deva'ir Evrakı (A.MKT.NZD), 427/91 (1278 [1861]); BOA, Sadaret Mektubi Kalemi Umum Vilayat Evrakı (A.MKT.UM), 214/84 (1272 [1855–1856]).

74 BOA, Babıali Evrak Odası Evrakı (BEO), 1315/98616 (1317 [1899]); BOA, BEO 1380/103485 (1317 [1899]); BOA, BEO 2676/200646 (1323 [1905]).

75 Bayly, The Birth of the Modern World, 191–93.

76 Mitchell, Carbon Democracy, 21.

77 BOA, Dahiliye Emniyet-i Umumiye Tahrirat Kalemi Evrakı (DH.EUM.THR) 94/6 (1327 [1909]).

78 Lockman, Zachary, “‘Worker’ and ‘Working Class’ in pre-1914 Egypt: A Rereading,” in Workers and Working Classes in the Middle East: Struggles, Histories, Historiographies, ed. Lockman, Zachary (Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press, 1994), 84Google Scholar.

79 BOA, Dahiliye Nezareti Emniyet-i Umumiye Kısm-ı Adli Kalemi (DH.EUM.KADL), 3/44 (1328 [5 January 1911]).

80 Beinin, Workers and Peasants in the Modern Middle East, 78.

81 Yıldırım, Kadir, Osmanlılar'da İşçiler (1870–1922) (Istanbul: İletişim, 2013), 233, 235Google Scholar; BOA, Zabtiye Nezareti Evrakı (ZB) 312/16 23 November 1908.

82 Hanioğlu, M. Şükrü, Preparation for a Revolution: The Young Turks, 1902–1908 (London: Oxford University Press, 2001), 311Google Scholar.

83 Coal heavers were officially included in this definition circa 1910. See BOA, DH.EUM.KADL, 3/44 5 (1328 [January 1911]).

84 BOA, ZB 491/75, (1324 [1906]); BOA, DH.MKT 2616/37 (1326 [1908]); BOA, Dahiliye Nezareti İdare Evrakı (DH.İD), 112–1/21 (1332 [1914]); BOA, DH.EUM.KADL, 3/44 (1329 [1911]).

85 See the copy of Jevons' Foreign Trade in Coal in the Churchill Archives, CHAR 11/21 (Feb. 1904–24 Dec. 1909); and the correspondence by Jevons in the Churchill Archives, CHAR 2/597A-B (Dec. 1936).

86 Mitchell, Carbon Democracy, 36.

87 The first noticeable appearance of this notion in Marxist thought is in the 1848 Communist Manifesto. Its seminal application in British historiography is Thompson's, E.P.The Making of the English Working Class (New York: Pantheon Books, 1963)Google Scholar.

88 Quataert, Miners and the State in the Ottoman Empire, 53.

89 Chakrabarty, Dipesh, Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2008 [2000]), chap. 3Google Scholar.

90 Examples of correspondence to and between different governmental ministries about necessary institutional and budgetary adjustments include BOA, BEO 4019/301377 (1330 [1912]), R 5; and BOA, DH.İD 112–1/15 (1330 [1912]), Ş 6.

91 BOA, DH.İD 112–1/15 (1330 [1912]), Ş 6.

92 Ibid.

93 BOA, Dahiliye Muhaberat-ı Umumiye İdaresi Evr. (DH. MUİ) 115/36 (1328 [28 July 1910]).

94 DH.EUM.KADL, 3/44 (1328 [5 January 1911]).

95 Ibid.

96 Quataert, Miners and the State in the Ottoman Empire, 43.

97 Yıldırım, Osmanlılar'da İşçiler, 282.

98 Barak, On Time, 180–83; Podobnik, Global Energy Shifts, 69–71.

99 BOA, Dahiliye Nezareti İdare-i Umumiye Evrakı (DH.İ.UM), 59–1/125 (1333 [1915]); BOA, DH.İ.UM 89–01/165 (1333 [1915]); and BOA, DH.İ.UM 89–03/105 (1333 [1915]).