Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T00:18:11.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Consensus Development Conference and the European Experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Johannes Vang
Johannes Vang
Affiliation:
WHO Regional Office for Europe
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The consensus development program for health care is an American invention which dates back to 1977. It is derived out of concern for the appropriate use of medical technology and designed to formalize the process by which research pertinent to health care is disseminated and used.

Type
Technology Assessment: Policy, Clinical, and Methodological Issues
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , January 1986 , pp. 65 - 76
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Agersnap, T., Jakobsen, G., & Kempinski, J.Konsensuskonferencer i Danmark. Copenhagen: Danish Hospital Institute, 1984.Google Scholar
2. Consensus development conference: coronary artery bypass surgery. British Medical Journal, Correspondence, 1984, 289, 1690–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Consensus Report: Early Detection of Breast Cancer. Copenhagen: Danish Medical Research Council, 1983.Google Scholar
4.Forsythe, M.Personal View. British Medical Journal, 1985, 290, 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Jacoby, I., & Rose, M.Consensus Conference on Cholesterol and Heart Disease. The Lancet, 1985, 27 07, 205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Kerr, R. A.Heart Panel's Conclusions Questioned. Science, 1985, 227, 40–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Jennett, B.Commentary by chairman of conference. British Medical Journal, 1985, 291, 716–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Jonsson, E. Personal communication.Google Scholar
9.May, William E.Consensus or Coercion. JAMA, 1985, 254, No. 8, 1077.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Mullan, F., & Jacoby, I.The Town Meeting for Technology. JAMA, 1985, 254, No. 8, 1068–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.NIH Consensus Development Conference Summaries. Bethesda, MD: Office for Medical Applications of Research, Vol. 2, 1979.Google Scholar
12.NIH Consensus Development Conference Summaries. Bethesda, MD: Office for Medical Applications of Research, Vol. 3, 1980.Google Scholar
13.Oliver, M. F.Consensus Conferences. The Lancet, 1985, 17 08, 389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Oliver, M. F.Consensus or Nonsensus Conferences on Coronary Heart Disease. The Lancet, 1985, 11 05, 1087–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Pride, R. B.Consensus development conference: coronary artery bypass grafting. British Medical Journal, 1985, 290, 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Smith, T.Consensus on cabbage. British Medical Journal, 1985, 289, 1477–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Spodick, David H.Consensus conferences. British Medical Journal, Correspondence, 1985, 290, 154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Stocking, B., & Jennett, B.Coronary Artery Bypass Consensus. The Lancet, 1985, 20 07, 158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Stocking, B.First consensus development conference in United Kingdom: on coronary artery bypass grafting. British Medical Journal, 1985, 291, 713–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Wennberg, J., & Gittelsohn, A. M.Small area variations in health care delivery. Science, 1973, 182, 1102–08.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Wennberg, J., & Gittelsohn, A. M.Health care delivery in Maine: I. Patterns of use of common surgical procedures. Maine Medical Association, 1975, 66, 123–30, 149.Google Scholar