Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T11:27:43.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DEVELOPING THE HTA CORE MODEL FOR THE ONLINE ENVIRONMENT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2015

Kristian Lampe ,
Iris Pasternack ,
Oskari Saarekas ,
Leena Raustia ,
Irina Cleemput ,
Mirella Corio ,
Gottfried Endel ,
Katrine Frønsdal ,
Iñaki Imaz  and
Sarah Kleijnen
...Show all authors
Kristian Lampe
Affiliation:
Finnish Office for Health Techology Assessment (FINOHTA), National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL)
Iris Pasternack
Affiliation:
Finnish Office for Health Techology Assessment (FINOHTA), National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL) and Summaryx Ltd
Oskari Saarekas
Affiliation:
Finnish Office for Health Techology Assessment (FINOHTA), National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL)
Leena Raustia
Affiliation:
Finnish Office for Health Techology Assessment (FINOHTA), National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL)
Irina Cleemput
Affiliation:
Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE) and Hasselt University
Mirella Corio
Affiliation:
Innovazione, sperimentazione e sviluppo, Agenzia Nazionale per i Servizi Sanitari Regionali (Agenas)
Gottfried Endel
Affiliation:
Team HTA, Department for Evidence Based Economic Health Care, Main association of Austrian Social Insurance Institutions (HVB)
Katrine Frønsdal
Affiliation:
Norwegian Knowledge Centre for Health Services (NOKC)
Iñaki Imaz
Affiliation:
Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias (AETS), Instituto de Salud “Carlos III”
Sarah Kleijnen
Affiliation:
Dutch National Health Care Institute (ZIN)
Finn Kristensen
Affiliation:
EUnetHTA Secretariat, Danish Health and Medicines Authority (DHMA) and University of Southern Denmark
Alric Rüther
Affiliation:
Department of Health Care Quality, Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG)
Sophie Werkö
Affiliation:
Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment (SBU) and Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics (LIME), Karolinska Institutet
Marina Cerbo
Affiliation:
Innovazione, sperimentazione e sviluppo, Agenzia nazionale per i servizi sanitari regionali (Agenas)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background: A framework for collaborative production and sharing ofHTA information, the HTA Core Model, was originally developed within EUnetHTA in2006–08. In this paper, we describe the further development of theModel to allow implementation and utilization of the Model online. The aim wasto capture a generic HTA process that would allow effective use of the HTA CoreModel and resulting HTA information while at the same time not interfering withHTA agencies' internal processes.

Methods: The work was coordinated by a development team in Finland,supported by an international expert group. Two pilot testing rounds wereorganized among EUnetHTA agencies and two extensive core HTA projects tested thetool in a real setting. The final work was also formally validated by a group ofHTA agencies.

Results: The HTA Core Model Online—available at http://www.corehta.info—is a web site hosting a) a tool toallow electronic utilization of the HTA Core Model and b) a database of producedHTA information. While access to the HTA information is free to all, theproduction features are currently available to EUnetHTA member agencies only. Apolicy was crafted to steer the use of the Model and produced information.

Conclusions: We have successfully enabled electronic use of the HTACore Model and agreed on a policy for its utilization. The system is alreadybeing used in subsequent HTA projects within EUnetHTA Joint Action 2. Identifiedshortcomings and further needs will be addressed in subsequent development.

Keywords

health technology assessmentmodelsmedical informatics applicationsclassificationresearch design
Type
Theme Submissions
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 30 , Issue 5 , November 2014 , pp. 478 - 487
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Lampe, K, Mäkelä, M, Garrido, MV, et al. The HTA core model: A novel method for producing and reporting health technology assessments. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25 (Suppl 2):9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Liberati, A, Sheldon, TA, Banta, HD. EUR-ASSESS Project Subgroup report on methodology. Methodological guidance for the conduct of health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1997;13:186–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Pasternack, I, Anttila, H, Mäkelä, M, Ikonen, T, Räsänen, P, Lampe, K, et al. Testing the HTA core model: Experiences from two pilot projects. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25 (Suppl 2):21–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Kristensen, FB, Lampe, K, Chase, DL, et al. Practical tools and methods for health technology assessment in Europe: Structures, methodologies, and tools developed by the European Network for Health Technology Assessment, EUnetHTA. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25 (Suppl 2):1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. EUnetHTA Work Package 4. HTA core model for medical and surgical interventions 1.0r. http://www.corehta.info/model/HTA%20Core%20Model%20for%20Medical%20and%20Surgical%20Interventions%201.0r.pdf (accessed November 11, 2013).Google Scholar
6. EUnetHTA Work Package 4. HTA core model for diagnostic technologies 1.0r. http://www.corehta.info/model/HTA%20Core%20Model%20for%20Diagnostic%20Technologies%201.0r.pdf (accessed November 11, 2013).Google Scholar
7. EUnetHTA Work Package 4. Core HTA on drug eluting stents. http://www.eunethta.eu/outputs/core-hta-drug-eluting-stents (accessed November 11, 2013).Google Scholar
8. EUnetHTA Work Package 4. Core HTA on MSCT Angiography. http://www.eunethta.eu/outputs/core-hta-msct-angiography (accessed November 11, 2013).Google Scholar
9. Liberati, A, Altman, DG, Tetzlaff, J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:W65–W94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Moher, D, Hopewell, S, Schulz, KF, et al. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int J Surg. 2012;10:28–55. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.10.001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. von Elm, E, Altman, DG, Egger, M, et al. STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:344–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Brouwers, M, Kho, ME, Browman, GP, et al. AGREE, II: Advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in healthcare. Can Med Assoc J. 2010;182:E839–E842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]. Version 5.2. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2012.Google Scholar
14. Kidholm, K, Ekeland, AG, Jensen, LK, et al. A model for assessment of telemedicine applications: Mast. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012;28:44–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. EUnetHTA Joint Action WP4. Policy for the HTA Core Model and core HTA information. Version 1.0. http://www.eunethta.eu/outputs/policy-hta-core-model-and-core-hta-information (accessed November 11, 2013).Google Scholar
16. Chalon PX, Kraemer P. The EUnetHTA Information Management System: Development and lessons learned. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2014:514--520. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. EUnetHTA Joint Action Final Technical Report. http://www.eunethta.eu/outputs/eunethta-ja1-final-technical-report (accessed November 11, 2013).Google Scholar
18. Lo Scalzo A, Vicari N, Corio M, et al. Collaborative models for the joint production of Core Health Technology Assessments: Negative and positive aspects for the joint work of different European agencies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2014:536--543. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. European Network for Health Technology Assessment. EUnetHTA Stakeholder Forum. EUnetHTA. http://www.eunethta.eu/eunethta-stakeholder-forum (accessed November 11, 2013).Google Scholar
20. EUnetHTA Work Package 4. HTA Core Model for Screening Technologies 1.0. http://www.corehta.info/model/HTA%20Core%20Model%20for%20Screening%20Technologies%201.0.pdf (accessed November 11, 2013).Google Scholar
21. Chase, D, Rosten, C, Turner, S, Hicks, N, Milne, R. Development of a toolkit and glossary to aid in the adaptation of health technology assessment (HTA) reports for use in different contexts. Health Technol Assess. 2009;13:1–142, iii.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Vickery, BC. Ontologies. J Inform Sci. 1997;23:277–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Lumsden, J, Hall, H, Cruickshank, P. Ontology definition and construction, and epistemological adequacy for systems interoperability: A practitioner analysis. J Inform Sci. 2001;37:248–255.Google Scholar
24. Hauptverband der österreichischen Sozialversicherungsträger. Abdominal aorta aneurysm – Cost-effectiveness analysis on introduction of organized screening in comparison to current practice in Austria. 2013. http://www.hauptverband.at/portal27/portal/hvbportal/channel_content/cmsWindow?action=2&p_menuid=75602&p_tabid=5 (accessed November 11, 2013).Google Scholar